SEC Filing - Marchex

Year ended
December 31,
2004

Year ended
December 31,
2005

Distribution Partner A

Distribution Partner B

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Form 10-KSB

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-KSB

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number 000-50658

Marchex, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

35-2194038

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S Employer

Identification No.)

413 Pine Street, Suite 500, Seattle, Washington 98101

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number: (206) 331-3300

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:

Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share

4.75% Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock $0.01 par value per share

Check mark whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x

Check mark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Check mark if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Registrant’s revenues for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 were $94,995,847.

Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $461,056,190 as of February 15, 2006 based upon the closing sale price on the Nasdaq National Market reported for such date. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

There were 11,665,716 shares of the registrant’s Class A common stock issued and outstanding as of March 28, 2006 and 26,553,294 shares of the registrant’s Class B common stock issued and outstanding as of March 28, 2006.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III incorporates information by reference from the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 2006.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes ¨ No x

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page
Part I

ITEM 1.	DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS	1

ITEM 2.	DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY	17

ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	17

ITEM 4.	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	17

Part II

ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	18

ITEM 6.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION	20

ITEM 7.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	61

ITEM 8.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	96

ITEM 8A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	96

ITEM 8B.	OTHER INFORMATION	96

Part III

ITEM 9.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT	97

ITEM 10.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	97

ITEM 11.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	97

ITEM 12.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS	97

ITEM 13.	EXHIBITS	97

ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	97

SIGNATURES

EXHIBIT INDEX

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We use words such as “believes”, “intends”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “plans”, “may”, “will” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Discussions containing forward-looking statements may be found in the material set forth under “Business,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation” and in other sections of the report. All forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements regarding our future operating results, financial position, and business strategy, expectations regarding our growth and the growth of the industry in which we operate, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are inherently uncertain as they are based on our expectations and assumptions concerning future events. Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this report may turn out to be inaccurate. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. They may be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties, including the risks, uncertainties and assumptions described in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report may not occur as contemplated, and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated or implied by the forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements in this report are made as of the date hereof, based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statement.

PART 1

ITEM 1.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.

Overview

References herein to “we”, “us” or “our” refer to Marchex, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries unless the context specifically states or implies otherwise.

We deliver vertical and local online traffic to merchant advertisers and help publishers monetize traffic on their Web site(s). We do this primarily through providing merchants with performance-based advertising and search marketing technology services to market their products or services across relevant online distribution points, including search engines, product shopping engines, vertical Web sites, and local Web sites; and through providing publishers with merchant advertisers who are looking to market their products or services on the publisher search network, shopping network, or Web site, or a specific page of the publisher Web site.

We offer advertiser technology services that allow us to aggregate merchants of different profiles, ranging from small local businesses to large enterprises. Our merchant advertiser technology services include: feed management, bid management, contextual targeting, pay-per-click targeting, natural search optimization; and outsourced search marketing platforms, which is a combination of many of our advertiser technology services that we provide to super-aggregator partners and publishers to allow them to sell search marketing packages directly to their customers. We have a broad network of online distribution for our merchant advertisers’ products that consist of: (1) a partner network, which are publishers that want our merchants’ products or advertisements which they can promote on their network or Web site(s), and (2) a proprietary network, which is traffic that comes to Web sites we own. Our partner network includes search engines, product shopping engines, and vertical Web sites, such as Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Shopping.com, Shopzilla, BusinessWeek.com, Forbes.com, Travel + Leisure, the Ziff Davis Media Web sites, and others. Our proprietary network is comprised of more than 200,000 Web sites.

We believe we have characteristics that include: (1) owning proprietary, performance-based advertising technologies which merchants can leverage to efficiently market their products and services online, (2) owning proprietary online traffic, which allows merchants to reach targeted potential customers, and (3) offering a diverse network of partner online traffic sources, which allows merchants to reach a wide audience of potential customers.

We have a suite of technology-based products that facilitate and support the efficient and cost-effective marketing and selling of goods and services online through the most rapidly-developing online marketing methods, including search and contextual marketing. We accomplish this by providing multiple services for merchants:

•

Feed Management. We leverage our proprietary technology to crawl and extract relevant product content from merchant advertisers’ databases and Web sites to create highly-targeted product and service listings, which we deliver into our distribution network. Our trusted feed relationships with our distribution partners enable merchant advertisers to deliver comprehensive and up-to-date product and service listings to some of the Web’s largest search engines, product shopping engines and directories.

•

Bid Management. We enable merchant advertisers to: (1) track, monitor and optimize the placement of performance-based search advertising campaigns across a number of search engines and pay-per-click networks using our bid management services; and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of online advertising campaigns using our conversion tracking and detailed reporting services.

•

Contextual Targeting. We sell advertising placement on specialized vertical and branded Web sites, and on specific sections of a Web site advertising listings on a bid-for-click basis. We also refer to this as site-specific contextual advertising. We believe this site-specific approach to contextual advertising allows publishers an opportunity to monetize the value of their own brand and traffic, and gives advertisers greater transparency and relevancy.

•

Pay-Per-Click Targeting. We deliver pay-per-click advertising listings that are reflective of our merchant advertisers’ products and services to online users in response to their keyword search queries. At present, these pay-per-click listings are generally ordered in the search results based on the amount our merchant advertisers choose to pay for a targeted placement. These targeted listings are displayed to consumers and businesses through our distribution network of leading search engines, product shopping engines, directories and other Web sites. We also generate revenue from cost-per-action services, which occur when the online user is redirected from the Company Web sites to a merchant advertiser Web site and completes a specified action.

•

Natural Search Engine Optimization. We optimize key attributes of merchant advertiser Web sites to ensure the greatest opportunity for proper indexing, listing and inclusion in the editorial results of algorithmic search engines.

•

Outsourced Search Marketing Platforms. We support the online marketing efforts of local businesses and SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) by providing super-aggregator partners, such as yellow page publishers and newspaper companies, with an outsourced platform of our performance-based advertising and search marketing technology services. Our outsourced platform allows super-aggregator partners to directly sell search marketing packages to their customers, such as yellow page or classified advertisers. Our outsourced platform for publishers, which is separate and distinct from our local platform, allows publishers to monetize their Web sites(s) with their advertiser relationships. Our outsourced platforms are provided to super-aggregator partners and publishers allowing the partners and publishers to sell and maintain under their brand. We create, distribute and fulfill local merchant advertisements through our network of distribution, which includes many of the leading search engines, such as Yahoo! and Google, and our proprietary vertical and local Web sites.

We believe we are among the leaders in the direct navigation market as we own a proprietary base of Web sites. The total number of Web sites in the portfolio is more than 200,000. Our Web sites can be categorized into 15 vertical commerce categories including: Auto, Business & Finance, Directory & Reference, Education,

Electronics & Technology, Entertainment, Health, Jobs, Other, Personals, Professional Services, Real Estate & Home, Shopping, Travel and ZIP Codes. The online user traffic is primarily monetized with pay-per-click listings that are relevant to the Web sites, as well as other forms of advertising, which may include banner placements or sponsorships. As such, the Web sites connect online users searching for specific information with relevant advertisements.

We intend to continue introducing products and services that will enable merchants to successfully acquire customers and transact online. While we currently provide performance-based advertising and search marketing technology services, in the future we may provide additional, complementary services. We also intend to increase our position in the local search market by continuing to support super-aggregator partners with our outsourced platform, which will provide more local merchants with the ability to market their products online. Additionally, we intend to focus on growing proprietary traffic sources that can drive potential customers to our merchants.

We were incorporated in Delaware on January 17, 2003. Acquisition initiatives have played an important part in our corporate history to date and are a component of our overall strategy. We have completed the following acquisitions since our inception:

•

On February 28, 2003, we acquired eFamily together with its direct wholly-owned subsidiary Enhance Interactive.

•

On October 24, 2003, we acquired TrafficLeader.

•

On July 27, 2004, we acquired goClick.

•

On February 14, 2005, we acquired certain assets of Name Development.

•

On April 26, 2005, we acquired certain assets of Pike Street.

•

On July 27, 2005, we acquired IndustryBrains.

Industry Overview

Performance-Based Advertising

As technology and the Internet continue to evolve, consumers are becoming increasingly confident that they can find comprehensive product information and securely transact online. As consumers spend more time and money online, advertisers are turning to the Internet to market their products and services. Businesses of all sizes can benefit from the Internet’s potential to efficiently and cost-effectively reach consumers. With the U.S. Census Bureau reporting more than 23 million small businesses alone, we believe there is a large opportunity to sell online performance-based advertising services to businesses of all sizes. As a reflection of the potential impact of the Internet as an advertising medium, J.P. Morgan estimates that the United States Online Ad Market will grow from $13.4 billion in 2005 to $26.4 billion in 2008. Internet advertising enables merchant advertisers to measure the effectiveness of their advertising campaigns and to revise them in response to real-time feedback and market factors. Traditional forms of advertising are not as targeted and do not permit evaluation of results in as timely and accurate a manner.

Within the Internet advertising market, paid search has become one of the fastest growing sectors. J.P. Morgan estimates that paid search in the United States will grow 109% from $6.4 billion in 2005 to $13.4 billion in 2009. According to the Kelsey Group, only 17% of small and medium businesses in the United States currently utilize search marketing methods, but that number is expected to grow as more merchants experience the benefits. In addition, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers, 40% of Internet advertising in the second quarter of 2004 was performance-based, as opposed to 31% in the second quarter of 2003. Merchant advertisers are increasingly turning to performance-based online advertising for the following reasons:

•

Competitive Return-On-Investment. Merchant advertisers have experienced competitive returns on their online advertising campaigns. As advertisers have analyzed their marketing programs, they have

determined that they are able to pay more for their programs while still generating an acceptable return-on-investment. As a result, J.P Morgan estimates that the average price-per-click in the United States will increase from $0.43 to in 2005 to $0.49 in 2009.

•

Consumers’ Increasing Receptiveness to Performance-Based Advertising. Due to the relevancy and appropriate placement of advertisements, J.P. Morgan estimates that the rate at which consumers click through paid search advertisements will grow from 23% in 2005 to 26% in 2009.

Direct Navigation

Navigating and searching for information online has continued to evolve as users have become increasingly sophisticated. This continuing evolution has translated into a need for information providers to more efficiently provide highly-targeted, relevant information. Currently, there are three primary means through which online users access and search for information, products and services: search engines, commerce portals and direct navigation Web sites. Direct navigation is primarily characterized by online users directly accessing a Web site by: (1) typing descriptive keywords or keyword strings into the uniform resource locator, or URL, address box of an Internet browser; or (2) accessing bookmarked Web sites. It can also include navigating through referring or partner traffic sources.

J.P. Morgan estimates that the United States paid search market will reach $6.4 billion in revenue in 2005, and we believe the direct navigation market currently represents 10% or more of the paid search market and is growing at comparable annual rates. According to WebSideStory, Inc.’s StatMarket division, in September 2004 more than 67% of daily global Internet users arrived at Web sites by direct navigation defined as typing a URL into a browser address bar or using a bookmark rather than through search engines and Web links, compared to approximately 53% in February 2002. The growth of the direct navigation market is a result of consumers’ increasing sophistication in utilizing the Internet as a resource tool, coupled with their desire to quickly find targeted information, and their trust and experience that the depth and breadth of available and relevant online information extends to Web sites named by descriptive keywords. Direct navigation and the use of search engines, however, are not mutually exclusive. We believe that many of the commercially relevant Web sites which we own may be beneficiaries of search engine and directory traffic over time.

Strategy

We intend to leverage our senior management’s experience, our financial and human resources and our existing operations to provide technology-based merchant services that facilitate and drive growth in online transactions. Key elements of our strategy include the following initiatives:

•

Provide Quality Services in Support of Merchants and Partners. We believe providing high quality services will make us more valuable to our merchants and partners. We are building products and services that we believe are innovative and provide a high degree of utility. We intend to continue investing our resources to create or develop new products, technologies and business models. We intend to expand our services by providing systems and information that help merchant advertisers maximize the performance of online marketing budgets and by working with partners to develop and market new products. For example, the services we have developed include:

–

a search engine inclusion and optimization platform for merchant advertisers who want the greatest opportunity for proper indexing, listing and inclusion of their product and services in the editorial results of algorithmic search engines;

–

an advertising campaign management platform for merchant advertisers who want to continuously track, monitor and optimize the placement of performance-based search advertising campaigns across a number of search engines and pay-per-click networks; and

–

an outsourced search marketing services platform for large aggregators of advertisers, such as yellow page companies, who want an integrated platform to market performance-based advertising and search marketing services directly to their customers.

•

Increase the Number of Merchants Served. We believe we will continue to grow our base of merchant advertisers and strive to build merchant loyalty by providing merchants with a consistently high level of service and support as well as the ability to achieve their target return-on-investment thresholds. We intend to increase the number of merchants served through:

–

direct sales efforts, including strategic sales and telesales initiatives;

–

referral arrangements with entities that can promote our services to potential merchants, such as advertising agencies; and

–

partnerships with large aggregators of advertisers, such as regional yellow page companies.

•

Extend Presence in the Direct Navigation Market. We are in the process of implementing numerous initiatives to increase the traffic and monetization of our network of Web sites, including enhancing the utility of the Web sites, broadening our geographic presence and making selective purchases of complementary Web sites.

•

Develop New Markets. We intend to analyze opportunities and may seek to expand our technology-based services into new categories or new geographic areas where our services can be replicated on a cost effective basis, or where the creation or development of a service may be appropriate. We anticipate utilizing various strategies to enter new markets, including: developing strategic relationships; acquiring products that address a new category or opportunity; acquiring country-specific properties; and creating joint venture relationships and internal initiatives where existing services can be extended internationally.

•

Pursue Selective Acquisition and Consolidation Opportunities. We plan to selectively pursue strategic acquisitions. We apply rigorous evaluation criteria to acquisitions that are intended to enhance our strategic position, strengthen our financial profile, augment our points of defensibility and increase shareholder value. We do this through focusing on acquisition opportunities that represent a combination of the following characteristics:

–

under-leveraged and under-commercialized assets;

–

opportunities for business model, product or service innovation and evolution;

–

critical mass of transactions volume, merchants, traffic, revenue and profits;

–

business defensibility;

–

revenue growth and expanding margins and operating profitability or the characteristics to achieve significant scale and profitability; and

–

an opportunity to enhance efficiencies and provide incremental growth opportunities for our operating businesses.

Our Services

Through our suite of search marketing services, we have partnered with a diverse set of Internet traffic partners in order to provide our merchant advertisers with access to a large base of potential, targeted customers. Our distribution strategy has been focused on building a broad footprint with primary online traffic sources, including search engines, product shopping engines, vertical Web sites, and local Web sites. Additionally, we have focused on developing services and technologies to expand the suite of search-based marketing products we provide to online merchant advertisers. We believe that offering a holistic approach to search engine marketing services enables us to extend our reach to a broad base of customers and offer solutions that can generally address all the needs of a customer interested in search marketing.

Our services are used to support and build the businesses of our merchant advertisers. We enable merchants to market and sell their products and services online through the following technology-based services:


Service		Description
Performance-Based Advertising Services		Performance-based advertising services enable merchants to reach their target audience through search, product shopping and directory results. • Feed management. With feed management services, the ranking of a merchant advertiser’s listing is influenced by the relevance of the product or service in relation to the user search query. • Contextual targeting. With contextual targeting services, the amount that a merchant advertiser pays for the click-through and the relevance of its advertisement based on historical click-through rates, influences the rank of its listings within the applicable results set. • Pay-per-click targeting. With pay-per-click targeting services, the amount that a merchant advertiser pays for the click-through influences the rank of its listings within the applicable results set. With cost-per-action services, the online user is redirected from our Web sites to a merchant advertiser Web site and completes the specified action.
Search Marketing Services		Search marketing services are designed to assist merchant advertisers who want to acquire customers through search-based marketing methods, optimize the performance of their online advertising campaigns by tracking and analyzing historical results and refine their Web sites for increased relevance in algorithmic search engine indexes. • Bid management. Bid management services enable merchant advertisers to: (1) track, monitor and optimize the placement of performance-based search advertising campaigns across a number of search engines and pay-per-click networks using our bid management services; and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of their online advertising campaigns using our conversion tracking and detailed reporting services. • Natural search engine optimization. Natural search engine optimization services enable merchant advertisers to optimize key attributes of their Web sites to ensure the greatest opportunity for proper indexing, listing and inclusion in the editorial results of algorithmic search engines.
Outsourced Search Marketing Platforms		Outsourced search marketing platforms for local search services and web publishers are designed to enable super-aggregator partners and publishers with an outsourced, integrated search management platform to market performance-based advertising and search marketing services to their customers.

During the period ended December 31, 2005, performance-based advertising services comprised more than 94% of our total revenue while search marketing services and outsourced search marketing platform services accounted for less than 6% of total revenue. As we continue to develop our services and implement new technologies and services, we believe the breadth of our marketing solutions will lead to cross-leverage through technical integration.

Performance-Based Advertising Services

Merchant advertisers utilize our performance-based advertising services to reach millions of individuals and businesses who search online for information on products and services. According to a PricewaterhouseCoopers

April 2004 report, performance-based advertising is one of the most rapidly growing segments of Internet advertising, as it is one of the most efficient and effective means to generate competitive returns-on-investment for advertisers. Accordingly, we are building appropriate services to leverage this trend.

On any given search engine results page, the listings that appear can either be categorized as “sponsored listings” or “editorial listings.” By leveraging the combination of our pay-per-click and feed management performance-based advertising services, merchant advertisers can ensure the broadest coverage within a given results page in response to a user search query, since our pay-per-click management service ensures merchant advertisement appearance within sponsored listings, and our feed management service ensures merchant advertisement appearance within editorial listings. The following is a description of our performance-based advertising services:

Feed Management. Our feed management services deliver targeted advertiser listings into some of the Internet’s most visited search engines and product shopping engines. Feed management leverages our proprietary technology to crawl and extract relevant product data and content from a merchant advertiser database and Web site, and to create highly relevant, optimized URL strings and advertisement listings. Increased listing relevancy frequently translates into a better search experience for users, allowing them to find targeted results in response to their search queries, and a competitive return-on-investment for merchant advertisers, as higher relevance typically leads to increased click-through and conversion rates, or customer acquisitions.

Once our technology has crawled, extracted, optimized and refined the merchant advertiser URL strings and advertisement listings, such strings and listings are tagged and placed into partner search and directory indexes. These URL strings and listings map directly to user search queries that link back to specific product pages when clicked, which we believe typically leads to competitive advertiser conversion rates.

We believe that most algorithmic search engines crawl the Web approximately every seven to fourteen days. When a merchant’s Web site is crawled by algorithmic technology, many product and service listings tend to be excluded due to the nature of most merchant advertisers’ product databases, which contain complex structures and are dynamically updated. Our trusted feed relationships with our distribution partners allow us to deliver every merchant advertiser’s product and to provide updated content in frequent intervals, as we regularly refresh the listings with the most up-to-date information. This is a significant benefit for our merchant advertisers as we maximize the number of selling opportunities and for our distribution partners as we increase the relevance of a user search experience.

We believe that feed management is an important complement to algorithmic search technologies since merchant advertisers provide us with direct access to their internal product databases. Often, only once a feed management service has crawled, replicated and optimized hundreds or thousands of individual product and informational Web pages for a merchant advertiser do links to these pages appear within search engine results. We believe the indexing and subsequent listing of these Web pages made possible by feed management enhances the overall relevancy of the search engines with which the company partners. We also believe feed management is complementary to pay-per-click services as merchants: (1) can leverage our technology to create detailed listings for each of their products; and (2) can leverage our extensive keyword query string database to identify many relevant keyword listings often overlooked in the manual pay-per-click listing creation process.

Merchant advertiser URL strings and advertisement listings are typically ordered based on relevance to the user search query. Merchant advertisers generally pay us a fixed price for each click received on each URL string and advertisement listing.

Additionally, by leveraging proprietary technology, we can analyze an advertiser’s database as well as thousands to millions of actual, relevant user search queries to create additional, unique merchant advertiser listings that drive targeted traffic resulting in competitive conversion, or customer acquisition, rates. These additional unique listings are generally included as part of our basic feed management service.

Contextual Targeting. Our contextual targeting service enables merchant advertisers to market their products and services through targeted pay-per-click listings that we distribute through vertically-focused Web sites or specific pages of a Web site. Our services enable merchants to purchase keywords or keyword strings, based on an amount they choose for a targeted placement, that are specific to their products and services and their marketing objectives.

We believe contextual targeting services are an important complement to pay-per-click, algorithmic search and feed management technologies as they enable merchants to place relevant listings on relevant vertically-focused Web sites. This process has the dual benefit of: (1) enhancing the user experience by placing relevant targeted listings at the portion of a Web page dedicated to sponsored listings; and (2) connecting merchant advertisers with targeted customer leads.

The contextual results distributed by our services are prioritized for users by the amount the merchant advertiser is willing to pay each time a user clicks on the merchant’s advertisement and the relevance of the merchant’s advertisement, based on historical click-through rates. Merchant advertisers pay us when a click-through occurs on their advertisement.

Pay-Per-Click Targeting. Our pay-per-click services enable merchant advertisers to market their products and services through targeted pay-per-click listings that we distribute through search engine or directory results when a user searches for information, products or services. We provide our services to thousands of merchant advertisers who want to drive customer leads to their Web sites. Our services enable merchants to purchase keywords or keyword strings, based on an amount they choose for a targeted placement, that are specific to their products and services and their marketing objectives. We also generate revenue from cost-per-action services, which occurs when the online user is redirected from our Web sites to a merchant advertiser Web site and completes the specified action.

We believe that pay-per-click services are an important complement to algorithmic search and feed management technologies as they enable merchants to place relevant listings on a search engine results page related to a specific user information request. This process has the dual benefit of: (1) enhancing the user experience by placing relevant targeted listings at the portion of a search page dedicated to sponsored listings; and (2) connecting merchant advertisers with targeted customer leads.

When merchant advertisers submit advertisement listings to our service, we review them for relevance and for conformity with our editorial guidelines. We may also assist merchant advertisers in optimizing their advertisement campaigns by recommending relevant keywords or keyword strings based on their Web sites and product or service offerings.

The pay-per-click results distributed by our services are prioritized for users by the amount the merchant advertiser is willing to pay each time a user clicks on the merchant’s advertisement. Merchant advertisers pay us when a click-through occurs on their advertisement.

Merchant advertisers find us directly through our Web site and through contact with our sales force, and we find merchant advertisers through direct sales efforts, through third-party referral programs and through a variety of marketing activities that include trade shows, sponsorships, targeted mailings, online advertisements, e-mails and other promotional materials sent directly to merchant advertisers, advertising agencies and search engine marketers.

Search Marketing Services

Our search marketing services are designed to assist merchant advertisers who want to acquire customers through search-based marketing methods, optimize the performance of their online advertising campaigns

through tracking and analyzing historical results and refine their Web sites for increased relevance in algorithmic search engine indexes. The following is a description of our search marketing services:

Bid Management. Through our advertising campaign management services, merchant advertisers continuously track, monitor and optimize the placement of performance-based search advertising campaigns across a number of search engines and pay-per-click networks and track the effectiveness of their online advertising campaigns. Our bid management services allow our merchant advertisers to consolidate the purchasing, management, optimization and reporting aspects of performance based search advertising campaigns. We have partnerships with leading search and product shopping engines that allow us to place and manage our clients’ paid listings directly within their account management systems. Additionally, we provide detailed reporting services that enable merchants to track the effectiveness of their online advertising campaigns through conversion tracking and detailed reporting tools. By developing a common technology architecture underneath our platform of search marketing services, we are able to analyze the effectiveness of our merchant partners’ advertising campaigns across a wide array of services and provide detailed reporting, such as: revenue per month statistics, number of orders, average order size and conversion rate and revenue by keyword and revenue by distribution source.

Our bid management services broaden the potential reach of a merchant’s advertising campaign by including multiple distribution partners as options for bid placement. Merchant advertisers pay us a pre-negotiated rate when a click through occurs on their advertisement. Also, with our analytic tool set, merchants are effectively able to track the effectiveness of their online advertising campaigns through the use of conversion tracking and analytic services.

Natural Search Engine Optimization. Our natural search engine optimization technology optimizes key attributes of merchant advertisers’ Web sites to ensure the greatest opportunity for proper indexing, listing and inclusion in the editorial results of algorithmic search engines. By leveraging our experience in the search industry and relationships with search engine distribution partners, we have architected a flexible technology platform that is designed to enable us to efficiently optimize our merchant partner Web sites in order to meet the ever changing technical standards of our distribution partners.

We primarily attract merchant advertisers with product databases who want to increase their online sales and achieve targeted return-on-investment metrics. Potential merchant advertisers find our services and we find them through a variety of means, including contact by our direct sales staff, through marketing efforts such as trade shows or advertising, and through third-party referral programs. Merchant advertisers pay us fees to optimize their site for inclusion in algorithmic search results.

Outsourced Search Marketing Platforms

We offer an outsourced solution for strategic partners who have several hundred to several thousand direct merchant relationships. As part of our search management services, we can enable a strategic partner, aggregator of merchant partner relationships or publisher with all or part of our suite of search marketing services. For example, we currently enable major regional yellow page publishers with our advertising campaign management and feed management services which it can market to its local online yellow page merchants.

Partners can leverage this service in one of two ways, including: (1) as a fully outsourced solution, in which we manage and fulfill search marketing campaigns, and also deliver reporting on behalf of our partners; or (2) as a Web-based solution that allows aggregators or publishers to implement and manage campaigns directly. We principally receive payment for our outsourced search marketing services through a combination of variable licensing fees associated with total revenue generated using our technology platform, flat rate licensing fees for the use of our technology platform and per-click payments for clicks delivered from our pay-per-click and feed management network.

Our Distribution Network

We have built a broad distribution network for our marketing services comprised of many of the leading search engines, product shopping engines, directories and selected Web sites. With the completion of the recent Name Development asset acquisition, we acquired a proprietary source of direct navigation traffic.

Performance-Based Advertising Distribution

We distribute merchant advertisement listings and advertiser URL strings through hundreds of traffic sources, including search and product shopping engines, directories and Web sites. Distribution sources for our marketing services platform include:


Selected Search Engines	Selected Product Shopping Engines	Selected Vertical and Local Web Sites
Ask.com (formerly Ask Jeeves) Google LookSmart Microsoft Yahoo!	CNet’s MySimon Google’s Froogle.com MSN Shopping NexTag PriceGrabber.com Shopping.com Shopzilla Yahoo!Shopping	Bank Rate BusinessWeek.com Fodors Forbes.com Investors.com (Investors Business Daily) Motley Fool The Ziff Davis Media Web sites Travel + Leisure USAToday

Yahoo!, primarily through its subsidiaries, such as Overture and Yahoo!Shopping, is our largest distribution partner, accounting for approximately 11% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005. Over the past year, we have enhanced and grown this relationship with additional agreements with Yahoo! and its subsidiaries. Additionally, we have enhanced existing relationships with various other partners, including Google, and created several new relationships, including Microsoft, Ask.com (formerly Ask Jeeves), Shopzilla, BusinessWeek.com, Forbes.com, Investors.com and Fodors.com. We intend to continue enhancing our existing partner relationships and create new ones, where appropriate.

Payment arrangements with our distribution partners are often subject to minimum payment amounts per click-through. Other economic structures that we may use to a lesser degree include:

•

fixed payments, based on a guaranteed minimum amount of usage delivered;

•

variable payments based on a specified metric, such as number of paid click-throughs; and

•

a combination arrangement with both fixed and variable amounts.

Direct Navigation Distribution

We believe we are among the leaders in the direct navigation market due to our proprietary ownership of online user traffic, which totaled more than 27 million unique visitors in the month of December 2005. Unique visitor statistics are based on internal traffic logs, which calculate unique IP (Internet protocol) addresses on an unduplicated basis during a given month. This user traffic is generated from a portfolio of Web sites that are generally reflective of commercially-relevant search terms in many of the Internet’s most popular and dynamic vertical commerce categories and may include geographically-targeted elements. The total number of Web sites we own is more than 200,000. These vertical commerce categories include: Auto, Business & Finance, Directory & Reference, Education, Electronics & Technology, Entertainment, Health, Jobs, Other, Personals, Professional Services, Real Estate & Home, Shopping, Travel, and ZIP Codes. The online user traffic is primarily monetized with pay-per-click listings and graphical ad units that are relevant to the Web sites. As such, the Web sites connect online users searching for specific information with relevant advertisements.

Online users can navigate the Web sites through a number of ways. For example, an online user who is specifically interested in traveling to Beijing may enter www.beijing.com directly into the Web address or URL box of their Internet browser. Once the user has arrived at the Web site they will find listings and information related to Beijing. As the user finds relevant information and clicks on a particular listing, we receive a pay-per-click fee.

The following represents a sampling of our Web sites and their corresponding vertical commerce category:


Vertical Commerce Category		Web Site Examples
Auto		• AirBag.com • AutoLender.com • MotorScooter.com • PickUp.com
Business & Finance		• AnnualReport.com • Corporations.com • Debts.com • LoanConsolidation.com
Directory & Reference		• MovieDirectory.com • PhoneNumbers.com • SearchLocal.com • Yellow.com
Education		• CollegeGuide.com • GED.com • Instruct.com • Trigonometry.com
Electronics & Technology		• 3G.com • PBX.com • TextMessaging.com • VideoCamera(s).com
Entertainment		• Cuisine.com • Invitation.com • MovieDownload.com • Salsa.com
Health		• DrugTreatment.com • EyeSurgeons.com • HearingLoss.com • Podiatrist.com
Jobs		• BayAreaJobs.com • CareerInfo.com • HealthJobs.com • MiamiJobs.com
Other		• Certificate.com • Decals.com • Dolphins.com • Tornado.com
Personals		• MatchMaking.com • Matrimony.com • WeddingCeremony.com • WeddingReceptions.com


Vertical Commerce Category		Web Site Examples
Professional Services		• ChicagoDoctors.com • ManhattanSurgeon.com • PaloAltoDoctors.com • SeattleInsurance.com
Real Estate & Home		• HomeLenders.com • LawnFurniture.com • Ovens.com • Remodeling.com
Travel		• Beijing.com • Destination.com • IslandResorts.com • TourGuide.com
ZIP Codes		• 10013.com • 60614.com • 90210.com • 94123.com

Sales, Marketing & Business Development

As of December 31, 2005, we had 49 full-time employee equivalents in our sales department, 11 full-time employee equivalents in our business development department and 10 full-time employee equivalents in our marketing department. Our sales department focuses on adding new merchant advertisers to our operating businesses, while our business development department focuses on servicing existing distribution partnerships and selectively adding new distribution partners. Our marketing department focuses on promoting our services through affiliate relationships, press coverage, and industry exposure. Advertising and promotion of our services is broken into five main categories: direct sales, agency sales, super aggregator sales, online promotion, and referral agreements.

•

Direct Sales. Our sales staff targets new merchant advertiser relationships through telesales efforts, direct marketing, and attendance at industry events.

•

Agency Sales. Our agency program includes a group within the sales team that targets interactive agencies and other entities that service merchant advertisers. This sales group focuses on in-person and remote presentations of our services to agencies, and is also periodically engaged in various marketing initiatives at industry trade shows and conferences. Our agency agreements may include a combination of revenue sharing, performance-based fees and other costs.

•

Super Aggregator Sales. Our super aggregator program includes a group within the sales team that targets large aggregators of merchant advertisers. An example of a large aggregator relationship would be our partnership with a large regional yellow page company whereupon we supply a comprehensive, outsourced search marketing platform that integrates our advertising campaign management and feed management platforms for their merchant advertisers. Our super aggregator agreements include a combination of revenue sharing, licensing revenue and per-click fees.

•

Online Promotion. We engage in certain advertising and direct marketing focused on acquiring new merchant advertisers and new distribution partners.

•

Referral Agreements. We seek to build referral arrangements with entities that can promote our services to large numbers of potential advertisers. Our referral partner agreements are based on a combination of revenue sharing and performance-based fees.

We intend to continue our strategy of growing our merchant advertiser base through sales and marketing programs while being as efficient as possible in terms of our marketing and advertising costs. We continually

evaluate our marketing and advertising strategies to maximize the effectiveness of our programs and their return on investment.

Information Technology and Systems

We have a proprietary technology platform for the purposes of managing and delivering advertisements to our partners. We also combine third party licenses and hardware to create an operating environment that focuses on quality products and services, with such features as automated online customer purchasing, real-time customer support and interactive reporting for customers and partners. We employ commercially available technologies and products distributed by various companies, including Cisco, Dell, Intel, Microsoft, Sun Microsystems and Veritas. We also utilize public domain software such as Apache, Oracle, MySQL, Sun Microsystems Java and Tomcat.

Our technology platform is compatible with the systems used by our distribution partners, enabling us to deliver advertisement listings in rapid response to user queries made through such partners. We continue to build and innovate additional functionality to attempt to meet the quickly evolving demands of the marketplace. We devote significant financial and human resources to improving our merchant and partner experiences by continuing to develop our technology infrastructure. The cost of developing our technology solutions is included in the overall cost structure of our services and is not separately funded by any individual merchants or partners.

In order to maintain a professional level of service and availability, we primarily rely upon third parties to provide hosting services, including hardware support and service, and network monitoring at various domestic and international locations. Our servers are configured for high availability and large volumes of Internet traffic and are located in leased third-party facilities. Back-end databases make use of redundant servers and data storage arrays. We also have standby servers that provide for additional capacity as necessary. The facilities housing our servers provide redundant HVAC, power and Internet connectivity.

We continuously review ways to improve major aspects of our technology support and maintenance, including improving, upgrading and implementing business continuity plans, data retention initiatives, and backup and recovery processes.

Competition

Performance-Based Advertising

Many of our potential competitors, as well as potential entrants into our target markets, have longer operating histories, larger customer or user bases, greater brand recognition and greater financial, marketing and other resources than we have. Many current and potential competitors can devote substantially greater resources than we can to promotion, Web site and systems development. In addition, as the use of the Internet and other online services increases, there will likely be larger, more well-established and well-financed entities that acquire companies relevant to our business strategy; and invest in or form joint ventures in categories or countries relevant to our business strategy; all of which could adversely impact our business. Any of these trends could increase competition, reduce the demand for any of our services and could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We pursue a strategy that we believe allows us to work with all relevant companies in the industry, even those companies that may be perceived as our competitors. We intend to continue with a strategy that allows us to consider and pursue business arrangements with all companies in our industry.

We provide our services to: (1) merchant advertisers who advertise online; (2) partners who provide a distribution network for online advertising; and (3) other intermediaries who may provide purchasing and/or sales opportunities, including advertising agencies, search engine marketing companies and search engine

optimization companies. We depend on maintaining and continually expanding our network of partners and merchants to generate transactions online. As a result, we may work with, and compete with, those who:

•

sell performance-based advertising or search marketing services to merchants;

•

aggregate or optimize advertising inventory for distribution through search engines, product shopping engines, directories, Web sites or other outlets; or

•

provide destination Web sites or other distribution outlets that reach end users or customers of the merchants.

The online advertising and marketing services industry is highly competitive. Although overall Internet advertising expenditures have increased in the last few years, the advertising industry has suffered as many online businesses have ceased operations and many traditional businesses have scaled back their advertising budgets. In addition, we believe that today’s typical Internet advertiser is becoming more sophisticated in utilizing the different forms of Internet advertising, purchasing Internet advertising in a cost-effective manner, and measuring return-on-investment. The competition for this pool of advertising dollars has also put downward pressure on pricing points and online advertisers have demanded more effective means of reaching customers. We believe that these factors have contributed to the growth in performance-based advertising relative to certain other forms of online advertising and marketing, and as a result this sector has attracted many competitors.

Due to the long-term growth trends in online advertising, these competitors, real and potential, range in size and focus. Our competitors may include such diverse participants as small referral companies, established advertising agencies, inventory resellers, search engines, and destination Web sites. To some extent, we may compete with our business partners, as we do with all other types of advertising sales companies and agencies. To a more limited extent, we may also compete with traditional offline media such as television, radio and print and direct marketing companies, for a share of merchant advertisers’ total advertising budgets. Although we pursue a strategy that enables us to work with most, if not all, of our competitors, there are no guarantees that all companies will view us as a potential partner.

We are also affected by the competition among destination Web sites that reach users or customers of search services. While thousands of smaller outlets are available to customers, several large media and search engine companies, such as AOL, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo!, through its subsidiaries, dominate online user traffic. The online search industry continues to experience consolidation of major Web sites and search engines, which has the effect of increasing the negotiating power of these parties in relation to smaller providers. The major destination Web sites and distribution providers may have leverage to demand more favorable contract terms, such as pricing, renewal and termination provisions.

Direct Navigation

The direct navigation market is primarily categorized into two parts: (1) Web site owners, which are the entities that own the Internet domain and potentially monetize it through performance-based integrations with third parties, including pay-per-click integrations; and (2) Web site monetization providers, which are companies that provide the monetization engine for Web site owners, including pay-per-click providers. We believe that the segment of the direct navigation market that directly owns and monetizes Internet domains with performance-based advertising is highly fragmented, and that, as a result of the Name Development and Pike Street asset acquisitions, we are among the leaders in this segment.

While the availability of a high quality portfolio of multiple Internet domain names is limited and difficult to attain, the barriers to entry in the direct navigation market are also low as the cost of registering an individual Internet domain name is not significant. We expect competition to intensify as more analysis is conducted on, and more companies enter, the direct navigation market. This could adversely affect our competitive position and relatively small market share in the direct navigation industry.

Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights

We seek to protect our intellectual property through existing laws and regulations and by contractual restrictions. We rely upon trademark, patent and copyright law, trade secret protection and confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, customers, partners and others to help us protect our intellectual property.

Our technologies involve a combination of proprietary rights, owned and developed by us, commercially available software and hardware elements that are licensed or purchased by us from various providers, including Cisco, Dell, Oracle, Intel, Microsoft, Sun Microsystems and Veritas, and public domain software, such as Apache, Linux, MySQL, Sun Microsystems Java and Tomcat. We continue to develop additional technologies to update, supplement and replace existing components of the platform. We intend to protect these additional intellectual property rights through patent applications and trade secret enforcement.

Our policy is to apply for patents or for other appropriate statutory protection when we develop valuable new or improved technology. We currently do not have any registered patents. We have filed two patent applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for various aspects of our technologies and services, with the following titles, numbers and descriptions:

•

US Provisional Patent Application Serial Number 60/504,963, of Horowitz et al., entitled “Performance-Based Online Advertising System and Method,” was filed on September 23, 2003, with subsequent non-provisional US and PCT patent applications filed on September 23, 2004, and which are currently pending. These patent applications describe a system, method, and computer program product for implementing a performance-based online service for advertisers that provide the ability for advertisers to purchase various advertising products.

•

US Provisional Patent Application Serial Number 60/523,688, of Horowitz et al., entitled “Online Advertising System and Method,” was filed on November 21, 2003, with subsequent non-provisional US and PCT patent applications filed on November 19, 2004, and which are currently pending. This patent application describes an online advertising system, method, and computer program product configured to present an advertiser with keyword-driven pricing for advertisements.

The status of any patent involves complex legal and factual questions. The scope of allowable claims is often uncertain. As a result, we cannot be sure that: (1) any patent application filed by us will result in a patent being issued; (2) that any patents issued in the future will afford adequate protection against competitors with similar technology; and (3) that the patents issued to us, if any, will not be infringed upon or designed around by others. Furthermore, the performance-based search advertising industry has been the subject of numerous patents and patent applications, which in turn has resulted in litigation. The outcome of this ongoing litigation or any future claims in this sector may adversely affect our business or financial prospects.

We have been issued registered trademarks in the United States covering certain goods and services for “Marchex,” “Direct Search Inclusion,” “goClick.com,” “Sitewise” and “TrafficLeader.” We have also applied for registered trademark status for “Enhance Interactive” in the United States. In addition, we have been issued registered trademarks for “Marchex” in Australia, Benelux, Canada, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, Taiwan and the United Kingdom. We have also applied for registered trademark status for “Marchex” in a number of other foreign jurisdictions. We do not know whether we will be able to successfully defend our proprietary rights since the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of proprietary rights in Internet-related industries are uncertain and still evolving.

Regulation

The manner in which existing laws and regulations should be applied to the Internet in general, and how they relate to our businesses in particular, is unclear in many cases. Such uncertainty arises under existing laws regulating matters, including user privacy, defamation, pricing, advertising, taxation, gambling, sweepstakes, promotions, content regulation, quality of products and services, and intellectual property ownership and infringement.

To resolve some of the current legal uncertainties, we expect new laws and regulations to be adopted that will be directly applicable to our activities. Any existing or new legislation applicable to us could expose us to substantial liability, including significant expenses necessary to comply with such laws and regulations, and could dampen the growth in use of the Internet in general.

Several new federal laws that could have an impact on our business have already been adopted. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act is intended to reduce the liability of online service providers for listing or linking to third party Web sites that include materials that infringe copyrights or rights of others. The Children’s Online Protection Act and the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act are intended to restrict the distribution of certain materials deemed harmful to children and impose additional restrictions on the ability of online services to collect user information from minors. In addition, the Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act requires online services providers to report evidence of violations of federal child pornography laws under certain circumstances. The foregoing legislation may impose significant additional costs on our business or subject us to additional liabilities, if we were not to comply fully with their terms, whether intentionally or not. If we did not meet the safe harbor requirements of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we could be exposed to copyright actions, which could be costly and time-consuming. The Children’s Online Protection Act and the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act impose fines and penalties to persons and operators that are not fully compliant with their requirements. The federal government could impose penalties on those parties that do not meet the full compliance practices of the Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act. We intend to fully comply with the laws and regulations that govern our industry, and we employ internal resources and incur outside professional fees to establish, review and maintain policies and procedures to reduce the risk of noncompliance.

The acquisition of Internet domain names generally is governed by Internet regulatory bodies, predominantly the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). The regulation of Internet domain names in the United States and in foreign countries is subject to change. ICANN and other regulatory bodies could establish additional requirements for previously owned Internet domain names or modify the requirements for holding Internet domain names.

We post our privacy policy and practices concerning the use and disclosure of any user data on our relevant Web sites. Any failure by us to comply with posted privacy policies, Federal Trade Commission requirements or other federal, state or international privacy-related laws and regulations could result in proceedings by governmental or regulatory bodies that could potentially harm our businesses, results of operations and financial condition. In this regard, there are a large number of legislative proposals before the U.S. Congress and various state legislative bodies regarding privacy issues related to our business. It is not possible to predict whether or when such legislation may be adopted, and certain proposals, if adopted, could harm our business through a decrease in user registrations and revenue. These decreases could be caused by, among other possible provisions, the required use of disclaimers or other requirements before users can utilize our services.

Employees

As of December 31, 2005, we employed a total of 260 full-time employee equivalents. We have never had a work stoppage, and none of our employees are represented by a labor union. We consider our employee relationships to be positive. If we were unable to retain our key employees or we were unable to maintain adequate staffing of qualified employees, particularly during peak sales seasons, our business would be adversely affected.

Web Site

Our web site, www.marchex.com, provides access, without charge, to our annual report on Form 10-KSB, quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ITEM 2.

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.

Our headquarters are located in Seattle, Washington and consist of approximately 11,400 square feet of leased office space (increasing to 26,788 square feet over the lease term). The lease term for this office space expires in December 2009. We also have facilities in Orem, Utah where we lease approximately 10,665 square feet of office space under a lease which expires in August 2008 and in Eugene, Oregon where we lease approximately 6,725 square feet of office space under a lease which expires in October 2006. We also lease additional office space in Seattle, Washington; Las Vegas, Nevada; and New York, New York. These leases represent an aggregate of approximately 22,653 square feet of additional office space with lease terms expiring between June 2006 and November 2010. Our information technology systems are hosted and maintained in third party facilities under collocation services agreements. See “Information Technology and Systems.”

We believe that our existing facilities, together with additional space we believe we can lease at reasonable market rates, are adequate for our near term business needs.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are not a party to any material legal proceedings. From time to time, however, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, including claims of alleged infringement of intellectual property rights, and a variety of claims arising in connection with our services.

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

No matter was submitted during the fourth quarter of 2005 to a vote of security holders, through solicitation or proxies or otherwise.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Market Information

Our Class B common stock has been traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “MCHX” since March 31, 2004 when we completed our initial public offering at a price of $6.50 per share. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our Class B common stock. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sales prices for Marchex’s Class B common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market:


	High		Low
Year ended December 31, 2004
First Quarter (Beginning March 31, 2004)	$	8.88	$	8.88
Second Quarter	$	13.28	$	9.50
Third Quarter	$	13.35	$	8.56
Fourth Quarter	$	21.00	$	12.40
Year ended December 31, 2005
First Quarter	$	24.71	$	16.63
Second Quarter	$	18.44	$	13.82
Third Quarter	$	18.04	$	13.67
Fourth Quarter	$	25.66	$	14.23

Holders

As of December 31, 2005, there were 37,149,655 shares of common stock outstanding that were held by 392 stockholders of record. Of these shares:

•

11,665,716 shares were issued as Class A common stock, and as of this date were held by 5 stockholders of record; and

•

25,483,939 shares were issued as Class B common stock, and as of this date were held by 387 stockholders of record.

Dividends

In February 2005, the Company closed its offering of 230,000 shares of 4.75% convertible exchangeable preferred stock with a liquidation preference of $250 per share. This amount includes the exercise by the Company’s underwriters of their over-allotment option to purchase 30,000 additional shares of preferred stock.

We currently pay cash dividends on the preferred stock at the annual rate of 4.75% per share. Dividends on the preferred stock are cumulative, meaning that if they are not paid they continue to accrue and must be paid prior to the payment of any dividends on our common stock.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on shares of our common stock. Except for dividends payable on the preferred stock, we currently intend to retain our earnings for future growth and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay dividends on such shares will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, such as our results of operations, capital requirements, financial conditions, future prospects and other factors that the board of directors deems relevant.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

We issued the following securities, none of which have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) during the fourth quarter of 2005:

Certain warrants issued to the underwriters or their designees as compensation in connection with our initial public offering in April of 2004 were exercised for shares of stock (i) via cashless exercise resulting in the issuance of an aggregate of 6,543 shares of our Class B common stock and (ii) by cash payment of the exercise price of $8.45 per share resulting in the issuance of an aggregate of 8,000 shares of our Class B common stock. No underwriters were involved in these warrant exercises. Such sales and issuances of stock were made in reliance upon an exemption from the registration provisions of the Act set forth in Section 4(2) and Rule 506 of Regulation D thereof relative to the sale by an issuer not involving a public offering or the rules and regulations thereunder.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

We did not repurchase any of our outstanding shares of Class B common stock during the fourth quarter of 2005.

ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements which appear elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. This discussion contains forward-looking statements. Please see “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” for a discussion of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions associated with these statements.

Overview

We deliver vertical and local online traffic to merchant advertisers, and help publishers monetize traffic on their Web site(s). Our platform of performance-based advertising and search marketing services enables merchants to market their products or services across relevant online distribution points, including search engines, product shopping engines, vertical Web sites, and local Web sites; and enable publishers with merchant advertisers who are looking to market their products or services on the publisher search network, shopping network, or Web site, or a specific page of the publisher Web site.

We currently provide our merchant advertisers with the following technology-based services:

•

Pay-Per-Click Targeting. We deliver pay-per-click advertising listings that are reflective of our merchant advertisers’ products and services to online users in response to their keyword search queries. These pay-per-click listings are generally ordered in the search results based on the amount our merchant advertisers choose to pay for a targeted placement. These targeted listings are displayed to consumers and businesses through our distribution network of leading search engines, product shopping engines, directories and other Web sites. We also generate revenue from cost-per-action services, which occur when the online user is redirected from the Company web sites to a merchant advertiser web site and completes the specified action.

•

Outsourced Search Marketing Platforms. We support online marketing efforts of local businesses and SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) by providing super-aggregator partners, such as yellow page publishers and newspaper companies, with an outsourced platform of our performance-based advertising and search marketing technology services. Our outsourced platform allows super-aggregator partners to directly sell search marketing packages to their customers, such as yellow page or classified advertisers. Our outsourced platform for publishers, which is separate and distinct from the local platform, allows publishers to monetize their Web site(s) with their advertiser relationships. Our

outsourced platforms are provided to super-aggregator partners and publishers allowing the partners and publishers to sell under their brand.

We were incorporated in Delaware on January 17, 2003. Acquisition initiatives have played an important part in our corporate history to date. We have completed the following acquisitions since our inception:

•

On February 28, 2003, we acquired eFamily together with its direct wholly-owned subsidiary Enhance Interactive. eFamily was incorporated in Utah on November 29, 1999 under the name FocusFilter.com, Inc.

•

On October 24, 2003, we acquired TrafficLeader which was incorporated in Oregon on January 24, 2000 under the name Sitewise Marketing, Inc.

•

On July 27, 2004, we acquired goClick which was incorporated in Connecticut on October 25, 2000.

•

On February 14, 2005, we acquired certain assets of Name Development which was incorporated in the British Virgin Islands in July 2000.

•

On April 26, 2005, we acquired certain assets of Pike Street Industries, which was incorporated in Washington on March 6, 2002.

•

On July 27, 2005, we acquired IndustryBrains, which was incorporated in New York on January 31, 2002.

We currently have offices in Seattle, Washington; Orem, Utah; Eugene, Oregon; Las Vegas, Nevada; and New York City, New York.

Acquisitions

We have completed the following acquisitions during 2004 and 2005 which have been accounted for as business combinations.

goClick

In July 2004, we acquired goClick, a company focused on providing marketing technology and services for small merchants, for the following consideration:

•

$7.5 million in net cash and acquisition costs; plus

•

433,541 shares of Class B common stock.

The shares of Class B common stock were valued (for accounting purposes) at an aggregate amount of approximately $4.14 million.

Name Development

In February 2005, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Name Development, a corporation operating in the direct navigation market, for the following consideration:

•

$155.6 million in cash and estimated acquisition costs; plus

•

419,659 shares of Class B common stock.

The shares of Class B common stock were valued (for accounting purposes) at an aggregate amount of approximately $8.8 million.

Under the terms of the agreement, we acquired certain assets of Name Development, including its portfolio of Internet domains and Web sites, revenue-generating contracts, technology and systems for the operation of the

Name Development direct navigation business. We did not assume any other obligations with respect to Name Development as part of this asset acquisition.

Pike Street Industries

In April 2005, we acquired certain assets of Pike Street, an online yellow pages and lead generation provider for local merchants, for the following consideration:

•

$12.8 million in cash and estimated acquisition costs; plus

•

242,748 shares of Class B common stock; plus

•

212,404 shares of restricted Class B common stock which will vest over a three year period in installments of 16.67% after each six month period during that term.

The shares of Class B common stock, excluding the shares of restricted Class B common stock, were valued (for accounting purposes) at an aggregate amount of approximately $4.1 million.

We did not assume any other obligations with respect to Pike Street as part of this asset acquisition.

The shares of restricted Class B common stock were issued to employees of Pike Street and valued at approximately $3.6 million, which is recorded as compensation expense over the associated employment period during which these shares vest.

IndustryBrains

In July 2005, we acquired IndustryBrains, a company focused on monetizing Web sites through contextual advertising solutions, for the following consideration:

•

$16.1 million in net cash and estimated acquisition costs; plus

•

788,046 shares of Class B common stock; plus

•

176,909 shares of restricted Class B common stock issued which will vest over a two and one half year period in installments of 33.34% after each ten month period during that term.

The shares of Class B common stock, excluding the shares of restricted Class B common stock, were valued (for accounting purposes) at an aggregate amount of approximately $13.4 million.

The shares of restricted Class B common stock were issued to employee shareholders of IndustryBrains and valued at approximately $3.0 million, which is recorded as compensation expense over the associated employment period during which these shares vest.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

The assets, liabilities and operations of our acquisitions are included in our consolidated financial statements as of the date of the respective acquisitions.

All significant inter-company transactions and balances within Marchex have been eliminated in consolidation. Our purchase accounting resulted in all assets and liabilities from our acquisitions being recorded at their estimated fair values on the respective acquisition dates. All goodwill, intangible assets and liabilities resulting from the acquisitions have been recorded in our financial statements.

Presentation of Financial Reporting Periods

The comparative periods presented are for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005.

Revenue

We currently generate revenue through our suite of services, including our pay-per-click targeting, feed management, bid management, contextual targeting natural search optimization and outsourced search marketing services platforms.

Our primary sources of revenue are the performance-based advertising services, which include pay-per-click services, cost-per-action services and feed management services. These primary sources amounted to greater than 94% of our revenues in all periods presented. Our secondary sources of revenue are our bid campaign management services, natural search optimization services and outsourced search marketing platforms. These secondary sources amounted to less than 6% of our revenues in all periods presented. We have no barter transactions.

We recognize revenue upon the completion of our performance obligation, provided that: (1) evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) the arrangement fee is fixed and determinable; and (3) collection is reasonably assured.

In certain cases, we record revenue based on available and reported preliminary information from third parties. Collection on the related receivables may vary from reported information based upon third party refinement of the estimated and reported amounts owing that occurs subsequent to period ends.

Performance-Based Advertising Services

In providing feed management services, merchant advertisers pay for their Web pages and product databases to be crawled, or searched, and included in search engine, directory and product shopping engine results within our distribution network. Generally, the feed management listings are presented in a different section of the Web page than the pay-per-click listings. For this service, revenue is generated when an online user clicks on a feed management listing from search engine, directory or product shopping engine results. Each click-through on an advertisement listing represents a completed transaction for which the merchant advertiser pays for on a per-click basis. The placement of a feed management result is largely determined by its relevancy, as determined by the distribution partner.

In providing contextual targeting services, merchant advertisers purchase keywords or keyword strings, based on an amount they choose for a targeted placement on vertically-focused Web sites or specific pages of a Web site that are specific to their products or services and their marketing objectives. The contextual results distributed by our services are prioritized for users by the amount the merchant advertiser is willing to pay each time a user clicks on the merchant’s advertisement and the relevance of the merchant’s advertisement, which is dictated by historical click-through rates. Merchant advertisers pay us when a click-through occurs on their advertisement.

In providing pay-per-click advertising services, we generate revenue upon our delivery of qualified and reported click-throughs to our merchant advertisers or advertising service providers’ listings. These merchant advertisers and advertising service providers pay us a designated transaction fee for each click-through, which occurs when an online user clicks on any of their advertisement listings after it has been placed by us or by our distribution partners. Each click-through on an advertisement listing represents a completed transaction. The advertisement listings are displayed within our distribution network, which includes search engines, directories, destination sites, Internet domains or Web sites, and other targeted Web-based content. We also generate revenue from cost-per-action services, which occurs when the online user is redirected from the Company Web sites to a merchant advertiser Web site and completes the specified action.

Search Marketing Services

Merchant advertisers pay us additional fees for services such as bid management and natural search engine optimization. Merchant advertisers generally pay us on a click-through basis, although in certain cases we receive a fixed fee for delivery of these services. In some cases we also deliver banner campaigns for select merchant advertisers. We may also charge initial set-up, account or inclusion fees as part of our services.

Banner advertising revenue may be based on a fixed fee per click and is generated and recognized on click-through activity. In other cases, banner payment terms are volume-based with revenue generated and recognized when impressions are delivered.

Non-refundable account set-up fees are paid by merchant advertisers and are recognized ratably over the longer of the term of the contract or the average expected merchant advertiser relationship period, which generally ranges from twelve months to more than two years. Other account and service fees are recognized in the month or period the account fee or services relate to.

Other inclusion fees are generally associated with monthly or annual subscription-based services where a merchant advertiser pays a fixed amount to be included in our index of listings or our distribution partners’ indexes of listings. Revenues from these subscription arrangements are recognized ratably over the service period.

Outsourced Search Marketing Platforms

We generate revenue from super-aggregator partners and publishers utilizing our web-based technologies. We are paid a management or agency fee based on the total amount of the purchase made by the merchant advertiser. The partners or publishers engage the merchant advertisers and are the primary obligor, and we, in certain instances, are only financially liable to the publishers in our capacity as a collection agency for the amount collected from the merchant advertisers. We recognize revenue for these fees under the net revenue recognition method.

Industry and Market Factors

We enter into agreements with various distribution partners to provide distribution for the URL strings and advertisement listings of our merchant advertisers. We generally pay distribution partners based on a percentage of revenue or a fixed amount per click-through on these listings. The level of click-throughs contributed by our distribution partners has varied, and we expect it will continue to vary, from quarter to quarter and year to year, sometimes significantly. Our current growth will be impacted by our ability to increase our distribution, which impacts the number of Internet users who have access to our merchant advertisers’ listings and the rate at which our merchant advertisers are able to convert clicks from these Internet users into completed transactions, such as a purchase or sign up. Our current growth also depends on our ability to continue to increase the number of merchant advertisers who use our services and the amount these merchant advertisers spend on our services.

We anticipate that these variables will fluctuate in the future, affecting our growth rate and our financial results. In particular, it is difficult to project the number of click-throughs we will deliver to our merchant advertisers and how much merchant advertisers will spend with us, and it is even more difficult to anticipate the average revenue per click-through.

In addition, we believe we will experience seasonality. Our quarterly results have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate in the future due to seasonal fluctuations in levels of Internet usage and seasonal purchasing cycles of many merchant advertisers. It is generally understood that during the spring and summer months, Internet usage is lower than during other times of the year, especially in comparison to the fourth quarter of the calendar year. The extent to which usage may decrease during these off-peak periods is difficult to predict. Prolonged or severe decreases in usage during these periods may adversely affect our growth rate and results.

Service Costs

Our service costs represent the cost of providing our performance-based advertising services and our search marketing services. The service costs that we have incurred in the periods presented primarily include:

•

user acquisition costs;

•

amortization and impairment of intangible assets;

•

license fees;

•

credit card processing fees;

•

network operations;

•

serving our search results;

•

maintaining our Web sites;

•

domain name registration renewal fees;

•

network fees;

•

fees paid to outside service providers;

•

delivering customer service;

•

depreciation of our Web site and network equipment;

•

colocation service charges of our Web site equipment;

•

bandwidth and software license fees;

•

salaries of related personnel; and

•

stock-based compensation of related personnel.

User Acquisition Costs

For the periods presented the largest component of our service costs consists of user acquisition costs that relate primarily to payments to our distribution partners for access to their online user traffic. We enter into agreements of varying durations with distribution partners that integrate our services into their sites and indexes. The primary economic structure of our distribution partner agreements is a variable payment based on a specified percentage of revenue. These variable payments are often subject to minimum payment amounts per click-through. Other economic structures that we may use to a lesser degree include:

•

fixed payments, based on a guaranteed minimum amount of usage delivered;

•

variable payments based on a specified metric, such as number of paid click-throughs; and

•

a combination arrangement with both fixed and variable amounts.

Our method of expensing user acquisition costs is based on whether the agreement provides for fixed or variable payments. Agreements with fixed payments are generally expensed at the greater of: (1) pro-rata over the term the fixed payment covers; or (2) usage delivered to date divided by the guaranteed minimum amount of usage delivered. Agreements with variable payments based on a percentage of revenue, number of paid click-throughs or other metrics are generally expensed based on the volume of the underlying activity or revenue multiplied by the agreed-upon price or rate.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of:

•

payroll and related expenses for personnel engaged in marketing and sales functions;

•

advertising and promotional expenditures including online and outside marketing activities; and

•

cost of systems used to sell to and serve merchant advertisers.

Product Development

Product development costs consist primarily of expenses incurred in the research and development, creation and enhancement of our Web sites and services.

Our research and development expenses include:

•

compensation and related expenses;

•

costs of computer hardware and software; and

•

costs incurred in developing features and functionality of the services we offer.

For the periods presented, substantially all of our product development expenses are research and development.

Product development costs are expensed as incurred or capitalized into property and equipment in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.” This statement requires that costs incurred in the preliminary project and post-implementation stages of an internal use software project be expensed as incurred and that certain costs incurred in the application development stage of a project be capitalized.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of:

•

payroll and related expenses for executive and administrative personnel;

•

professional services, including accounting, legal and insurance;

•

bad debt provisions;

•

facilities costs; and

•

other general corporate expenses.

Acquisition-Related Retention Consideration

Acquisition-related retention consideration results from our contingent, earnings-based payment obligation to certain employees of Enhance Interactive for 2004, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement.

The contingent payment obligation was calculated based on the formula of 5.56% of Enhance Interactive’s earnings before taxes for each of the calendar years 2003 and 2004, up to a maximum payout cap of $1.0 million in the aggregate. All payments made under this obligation have been accounted for as compensation. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we recorded $499,000 in acquisition-related retention consideration. Subsequent to December 31, 2004, no additional obligations exist related to the acquisition-related retention consideration.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation consists of the following components:

•

the intrinsic value of employee option and restricted stock issuances in cases where the fair value of the underlying stock was greater than the exercise price on the date of the grant;

•

the fair value of non-employee option issuances; and

•

the amount by which the fair value of our Class B common stock exceeds the exercise price at the end of the period for certain options.

We used variable accounting for the options to purchase 125,000 shares of our Class B common stock that were issued under our stock incentive plan pursuant to the Enhance Interactive merger agreement. These options were held in escrow until February 28, 2004 as security for the indemnification obligations under the Enhance

Interactive merger agreement, and these options were subject to forfeiture during the escrow period. We accounted for these options as variable awards until February 28, 2004.

Amortization of Intangibles from Acquisitions

Amortization of intangible assets excluding goodwill relates to intangible assets identified in connection with our acquisitions.

The intangible assets have been identified as:

•

non-competition agreements;

•

trade and Internet domain names;

•

distributor relationships;

•

merchant advertising customer base relationships; and

•

acquired technology.

These assets are amortized over useful lives ranging from 12 to 84 months.

Provision for Income Taxes

For income tax purposes, we utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not be realized. Although realization is not assured, the Company believes it is more likely than not, based on its operating performance and projections of future taxable income, that the Company’s net deferred tax assets will be realized. In determining that it was more likely than not that the Company would realize the deferred tax assets, factors considered included: historical taxable income, historical trends related to merchant advertiser usage rates and projected revenues and expenses. The amount of the net deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if the Company’s projections of future taxable income are reduced or if the Company does not perform at the levels it is projecting. This could result in increases to the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and a corresponding increase to income tax expense of up to the entire net amount of deferred tax assets. From time to time, various state, federal, and other jurisdictional tax authorities undertake reviews of the Company and its filings. The Company believes any adjustments that may ultimately be required as a result of any of these reviews will not be material to the financial statements.

As of December 31, 2005, we had net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards of $1.7 million, which will begin to expire in 2019. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 limits the use of NOL and tax credit carryforwards in certain situations where changes occur in the stock ownership of a company. We believe that such a change has occurred, and that the utilization of the approximately $1.7 million of NOL carryforwards is limited such that substantially all of these NOL carryforwards will never be utilized.

Initial Public Offering

On March 30, 2004, we commenced an initial public offering of 4.6 million shares of our Class B common stock. The closing of our initial public offering took place on April 5, 2004. The proceeds of our initial public offering, net of cash offering expenses, were approximately $27.2 million. In connection with our initial public

offering, the underwriters were also granted warrants, exercisable over a four-year period commencing April 5, 2005 and ending April 5, 2009, to purchase 120,000 shares of Class B common stock at an exercise price equal to $8.45 per share. All of the net proceeds have been used to pay for product and business development, acquisitions and strategic relationships, capital expenditures, personnel, facilities, earn-out obligations, working capital and other general corporate purposes.

Accretion to Redemption Value of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock

All 6,724,063 shares of our outstanding Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock were automatically converted into 6,724,063 shares of Class B common stock upon the closing of our initial public offering in April 2004. Prior to this conversion, holders of our Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock were entitled to receive annual cumulative dividends at the per annum rate of 8% of the original purchase price per share when and if declared by our board of directors. Upon the conversion of the Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock, dividend rights were automatically terminated and any rights to past dividends were forgiven.

Prior to the automatic conversion, we accounted for the difference between the carrying amount of the redeemable preferred stock and the redemption amount by increasing the carrying amount for periodic accretion using the interest method, so that the carrying amount was equal to redemption amount at the earliest redemption date.

Follow-on Public Offering

In February 2005, we closed a follow-on public offering of 9,200,000 shares of Class B common stock at a public offering price of $20.00 per share and 230,000 shares of 4.75% convertible exchangeable preferred stock at a public offering price of $250 per share and with a liquidation preference of $250 per share. These amounts include the exercise by our underwriters of their over-allotment option to purchase 1,200,000 additional shares of Class B common stock and 30,000 additional shares of preferred stock. The common stock and preferred stock proceeds, net of total offering costs of $12.2 million, were estimated to be approximately $174.1 million and $55.3 million, respectively, for an aggregate amount of $229.4 million. Net proceeds have been used to fund the Name Development asset acquisition, the Pike Street Industries asset acquisition, the IndustryBrains acquisition and for working capital and other general corporate purposes. We intend to use the remainder of the net proceeds for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including for future acquisitions.

Holders of the preferred stock are entitled to receive cumulative dividends from the date of original issue at the annual rate of 4.75% of the liquidation preference of the preferred stock, payable quarterly on the 15^th day of February, May, August and November, commencing May 15, 2005. Any dividends must be declared by our board of directors and must come from funds which are legally available for dividend payments.

During 2005, the Company’s board of directors declared the following quarterly dividends on the Company’s 4.75% convertible exchangeable preferred stock:


	Per share			Total amount
Approval Date	dividend		Date of record	(in thousands)		Payment date
April 2005	$	3.00	May 4, 2005	$	690	May 16, 2005
July 2005		2.97	August 4, 2005		683	August 15, 2005
October 2005		2.97	November 4, 2005		683	November 15, 2005

In January 2006, the Company’s board of directors declared a quarterly dividend in the amount of $2.97 per share on its 4.75% convertible exchangeable preferred stock which was paid on February 15, 2006 to the holders of record as of the close of business on February 4, 2006. This quarterly dividend totaled approximately $662,000.

The preferred stock is convertible at the option of the holder at any time into shares of Class B common stock at a conversion rate of approximately 10.2041 shares of Class B common stock for each share of preferred

stock, based on an initial conversion price of $24.50. The initial conversion price is subject to adjustment in certain events, including a non-stock fundamental change or a common stock fundamental change. During 2005, approximately 4,515 shares of preferred stock were converted at the option of the holders into approximately 46,071 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock at a conversion price of $24.50 per share. In January 2006, approximately 2,500 shares of preferred stock were converted at the option of the holders into approximately 25,510 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock at a conversion price of $24.50 per share. In March 2006, the Company entered into privately negotiated and unsolicited transactions with certain holders of the preferred stock in which such holders converted approximately 80,848 shares of the Company’s preferred stock into approximately 824,978 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock at a conversion rate of $24.50 per share and received a cash payment from the Company of $12.00 per share of preferred stock for an aggregate amount of approximately $970,000 in order to induce conversions. The $970,000 will be reflected as a preferred stock dividend in the Company’s financial statements. Through March 16, 2006, approximately 142,137 shares of preferred stock remain outstanding following the conversions.

We may elect to automatically convert some or all of the preferred stock into shares of Class B common stock if the closing price of our Class B common stock has exceeded $36.75, which is 150% of the conversion price for at least 20 of the 30 consecutive trading days ending within 5 trading days prior to the notice of automatic conversion.

If we elect to automatically convert some or all of the preferred stock into shares of Class B common stock prior to February 15, 2008, we will make an additional payment on the preferred stock equal to the aggregate amount of cumulative dividends that would have accrued and become payable on the preferred stock from February 14, 2005 through and including February 15, 2008, less any dividends already paid on the preferred stock. This additional payment is payable in cash or, at our option, in shares of our Class B common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of Class B common stock.

We may elect to redeem the preferred stock, in whole or in part, at declining redemption prices on or after February 20, 2008.

The terms of the preferred stock contain an exchange right, at our option, to convert the preferred stock, in whole but not in part, on any dividend payment date beginning on February 15, 2006 into our 4.75% convertible subordinated debentures (Debentures) at the rate of $250 principal amount of Debentures for each share of preferred stock. This embedded derivative will be reflected as an asset, if there is any value ascribed to it, and is subject to variable accounting. The right will be marked to market at each reporting date until such time as the right is exercised or expires. Based on a variety of factors including the assessed probability of exercise, no value has been ascribed to this right as of December 31, 2005. The Debentures, if issued, will mature 25 years after the exchange date.

Comparison of the periods of the year ended December 31, 2004 (2004 period) to the year ended December 31, 2005 (2005 period)

Revenue. Revenue increased 117%, from $43.8 million for the 2004 period to $95.0 million in the same period in 2005. This increase was attributable to a $47.9 million increase in performance-based advertising services. Of this increase approximately 72% related to an increase in the average revenue per merchant advertiser, while approximately 28% related to an increase in the number of merchant advertisers. Approximately 63%, or $21.7 million, of the increase in the average revenue per merchant advertiser was due to an advertising services provider relationship initiated in 2005. Of the total revenue increase, $26.8 million is derived from more than 40 advertiser and advertising service provider relationships including the previously mentioned advertising services provider relationship and indirectly attributable to the Name Development and Pike Street asset acquisitions, including their portfolios of more than 100,000 Internet domain names. Of the total increase in revenue, $4.9 million was indirectly attributable to the acquisition of IndustryBrains in July 2005 and its merchant advertisers.

We believe the increase in revenue is primarily a result of the growth of our existing distribution partners, the increased number of searches and resulting click-throughs performed by users of our services, and new merchant advertisers and advertising services provider relationships. We also believe the foregoing factors, combined with our sales efforts and improved operational controls, have contributed to an increase in the average revenue per merchant advertiser. The increase in revenue in the 2005 period is also attributable to the acquisition of goClick in July 2004, which added more than 40 unique distribution partners and more than 5,000 unique merchant advertisers, and the acquisition of IndustryBrains in July 2005 which added more than 100 unique distribution partners and more than 1,000 unique merchant advertisers.

Our ability to maintain and grow our revenues will depend in part on maintaining and increasing the number of click-throughs performed by users of our service, primarily through our distribution partners. If we do not add new distribution partners, renew our current distribution partner agreements or replace traffic lost from terminated distribution agreements with other sources or if our distribution partners’ search businesses do not grow or are adversely affected, our revenue and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. Our ability to maintain and grow our revenues will also depend in part on maintaining and growing our proprietary traffic sources and also maintaining and increasing the number and volume of transactions with merchant advertisers, which we believe is dependent in part on delivering high quality traffic that ultimately results in purchases or conversions for our merchant advertisers.

Expenses

Service Costs. Service costs increased 78% from $27.4 million in the 2004 period to $48.9 million in the same period in 2005. The increase was mainly attributable to an increase in payments to distribution partners of $14.9 million, an increase in personnel costs of $814,000, an increase in payment processing fees of $420,000, an increase in facility and other costs of $458,000, an increase in licenses and royalties of $2.3 million and an increase in registration fees and Internet domain amortization of $2.5 million.

Approximately $13.5 million of the total increase in service costs for the 2005 period was attributable to the July 2004 acquisition of goClick, which was included for a partial period in 2004, and the July 2005 acquisition of IndustryBrains, which was not included in the same period in 2004.

This total increase also resulted from a greater number of searches, an increase in database and hardware capacity requirements, an increase in the number of personnel required to support our services and an increase in fees paid to outside service providers.

Service costs represented 63% of revenue in the 2004 period as compared to 51% in 2005. The 2005 decrease as a percentage of revenue in service costs as compared to the same period in 2004 was primarily a result of a larger proportion of revenue attributable to our proprietary traffic sources for which there are no corresponding distribution partner payments. Payments to feed management and pay-per-click distribution partners account for higher user acquisition costs as a percentage of revenue relative to our overall service cost percentage. To the extent that payments to feed management and pay-per-click services distribution partners make up a larger percentage of future operations, we expect that service costs will increase as a percentage of revenue. Our proprietary traffic sources have a lower service cost as a percentage of revenue relative to our overall service cost percentage. To the extent our proprietary traffic sources make up a larger percentage of our future operations, we expect that service costs will decrease as a percentage of revenue. We also expect that service costs will continue to increase in absolute dollars, since we anticipate expanding our operations.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased 127%, from $4.4 million in the 2004 period to $10.0 million in the same period in 2005. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expenses were 10% and 11% for the 2004 and 2005 periods, respectively. The increase in dollars was related primarily to an increase in personnel costs of $1.4 million related primarily to an increase in the number of employees and an increase in online and outside marketing activities of $3.9 million. The remaining increase is related to increases in other

operating costs arising from operations in multiple jurisdictions. We expect that sales and marketing expenses will increase in absolute dollars in connection with any revenue increase, to the extent that we also increase our marketing activities and correspondingly could increase as a percentage of revenue.

Product Development. Product development expenses increased 95%, from $2.3 million in the 2004 period to $4.5 million in the same period in 2005. As a percentage of revenue, product development expenses were 5% for both the 2004 and 2005 periods, respectively. The increase in dollars was primarily due to an increase in personnel costs of $1.7 million, primarily related to an increase in the number of employees, and travel, depreciation expense, and other operating costs of $440,000. We expect that product development expenses will increase in absolute dollars as we increase the number of personnel and consultants to enhance our service offerings.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased 55%, from $4.1 million in the 2004 period to $6.4 million in the same period in 2005. The increase in dollars was primarily due to an increase in personnel costs of $1.3 million, an increase in professional services of $409,000, an increase in facilities related costs of $348,000, and by a net increase in travel, bad debt, and other costs of $55,000. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses were 9% for the 2004 period and 7% in the same period in 2005. As a percentage of revenue, the decrease in general and administrative expenses in 2005 as compared to 2004 was primarily a result of general and administrative expenses being compared to a larger revenue base. We expect that our general and administrative expenses will increase in absolute dollars to the extent that we expand our operations and incur additional costs in connection with being a public company, including expenses related to professional fees and insurance.

Acquisition-Related Retention Consideration. Acquisition-related retention consideration was $499,000 for the 2004 period and zero in the same period in 2005. The acquisition–related retention consideration was calculated as part of the contingent, earnings-based payment obligation to certain employees of Enhance Interactive and was equal to 5.56% of Enhance Interactive’s earnings before taxes in excess of $3.5 million for the 2004 period of which $499,000 was recorded as acquisition-related retention consideration including employer payroll-related taxes. We had accounted for the payment amount as compensation. Subsequent to December 31, 2004, no additional obligations exist related to the acquisition-related retention consideration.

Facility Relocation. In March 2004, we entered into a sublease agreement for new and larger office facilities in Seattle, Washington, and we relocated from our original office facilities also located in Seattle, Washington. In March 2004, we accrued lease and related costs of $230,000 for the estimated future obligations of non-cancelable lease and other payments for the original facilities. The remaining lease obligations for the original facilities extend through June 30, 2006 and totaled $52,000 as of December 31, 2005. As of December 31, 2005, we estimate the net sublease income to be approximately $20,000 over the remaining life of the lease.

The remaining lease accrual is based on estimates of vacancy period and sublease income. The actual vacancy periods may differ from these estimates, and sublease income, if any, may not materialize. Accordingly, these estimates may be adjusted in future periods.

Stock-Based Compensation. The amortization of stock-based compensation increased 121%, from $891,000 in the 2004 period to $2.0 million in the same period in 2005. In the year ended December 31, 2005, the components of stock-based compensation were service costs of $4,500, sales and marketing of $1.1 million, product development of $29,000 and general and administrative of $830,000. Amounts in the 2004 period related primarily to the vesting of stock options granted to employees in which the exercise price was less than the fair market value at the date of grant and $407,000 related to restricted stock issued to employees for future services in connection with the acquisition of TrafficLeader. Amounts in the 2005 period related primarily to the effect of $1.7 million of stock-based compensation related to restricted stock issued to employees for future services in connection with the TrafficLeader and IndustryBrains acquisitions and the Pike Street asset acquisition net of forfeitures.

Amortization of Intangible Assets From Acquisitions. Intangible amortization expense increased 271%, from $5.0 million in the 2004 period to $18.4 million in the same period in 2005. The increase was associated with the July 2004 acquisition of goClick, the February 2005 Name Development asset acquisition, the April 2005 Pike Street asset acquisition and the July 2005 acquisition of IndustryBrains. During the 2005 period, the components of amortization of intangibles were service costs of $13.8 million, sales and marketing of $1.3 million and general and administrative of $3.4 million.

Our purchase accounting resulted in all assets and liabilities from our acquisitions being recorded at their estimated fair values on their respective acquisition dates. All goodwill, identifiable intangible assets and liabilities resulting from our acquisitions have been recorded in our financial statements. The identified intangibles amounted to $77.6 million and are being amortized over a range of useful lives of 12 to 84 months. We may acquire identifiable intangible assets as part of future acquisitions, and if so, we expect that our intangible amortization will increase in absolute dollars.

Other Income. Other income increased 521%, from $319,000 in the 2004 period to $2.0 million in the same period in 2005. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in interest income of $1.7 million which was primarily a result of the impact of our follow-on public offering in February 2005 on the average cash balances in the 2005 period as well as an increase in rates realized on invested funds.

Income Taxes. The income tax expense in the 2004 period was $34,000 as compared to $2.9 million in the same period in 2005. The increase in income taxes was primarily the result of pretax income of $6.8 million in the 2005 period compared to a pretax loss of $700,000 in the same period in 2004.

In the 2004 period, the effective tax benefit of 5% differed from the expected effective rate of 34% primarily due to state income taxes and non-deductible stock compensation amounts. The effective rate was 43% in the 2005 period. This differed from the expected rate of 34% due to state income taxes, non-deductible stock compensation and other amounts.

During the 2004 and 2005 periods, as a result of tax deductions from stock option exercises, we recognized tax-effected benefits of approximately $444,000 and $3.2 million, respectively, which were recorded as credits to additional paid in capital.

Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends. The convertible preferred stock dividends during the 2005 period of $2.4 million are based upon the convertible preferred shares with a dividend rate of 4.75% issued in February 2005 net of conversions during the period.

Accretion to Redemption Value of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock. The accretion to redemption value of preferred stock $420,000 in the 2004 and zero in the same period in 2005. The accretion to the redemption value recorded during the 2004 period is based upon 6,724,063 shares of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock outstanding as of April 5, 2004 with a dividend rate of 8% per annum. All 6,724,063 shares of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock automatically converted into 6,724,063 shares of Class B common stock upon the closing of the initial public offering on April 5, 2004.

Net Income (Loss) Applicable to Common Stockholders. Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders increased from a net loss of $1.2 million in the 2004 period to a net income of $1.5 million in the 2005 period. The increase was primarily attributable to revenue increasing at a faster rate than service costs, sales and marketing, product development and general and administration expenses offset by convertible preferred dividends of $2.4 million. There was also a decrease in acquisition-related retention consideration of $499,000 and facility relocation of $200,000.

Quarterly Results of Operations

The following tables set forth our unaudited quarterly results of operations data for the eight most recent quarters and periods ended December 31, 2005, as well as such data expressed as a percentage of our revenues for the periods presented. The information in the tables below should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. We have prepared this information on the same basis as the consolidated financial statements and the information includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, that we consider necessary for a fair statement of our financial position and operating results for the quarters or other periods presented. Our quarterly operating results have varied substantially in the past and may vary substantially in the future. You should not draw any conclusions about our future results from the results of operations for any particular quarter or period presented.


	Quarter ended
	Mar 31, 2004			June 30, 2004			Sept 30, 2004			Dec 31, 2004			Mar 31, 2005			June 30, 2005			Sept 30, 2005			Dec 31, 2005
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
Revenue	$	7,601,911		$	8,865,178		$	12,215,835		$	15,121,348		$	18,395,983		$	21,168,022		$	25,627,677		$	29,804,165


Expenses:
Service costs ⁽¹⁾		4,779,575			5,743,815			7,619,496			9,307,052			10,668,907			10,738,628			13,411,378			14,078,413
Sales and marketing ⁽¹⁾		1,009,972			1,030,710			1,156,314			1,217,047			1,324,986			1,543,895			2,759,826			4,390,150
Product development ⁽¹⁾		505,535			528,306			602,478			655,111			774,549			1,290,545			1,164,152			1,236,517
General and administrative ⁽¹⁾		694,748			846,680			1,072,505			1,497,611			1,452,034			1,473,561			1,494,080			1,944,898
Acquisition-related retention consideration ⁽²⁾		132,936			122,724			119,198			124,222			—			—			—			—
Facility relocation		230,459			—			(30,499	)		—			—			—			—			—
Stock-based compensation ⁽³⁾		360,764			235,234			125,405			169,117			146,538			497,169			557,958			770,142
Amortization of intangible assets from acquisitions ⁽⁴⁾		1,034,868			1,034,643			1,404,464			1,491,527			3,083,157			4,949,651			5,191,699			5,204,501

Total operating expenses		8,748,857			9,542,112			12,069,361			14,461,687			17,450,171			20,493,449			24,579,093			27,624,621

Gain on sales of intangible assets, net		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			997

Income (loss) from operations		(1,146,946	)		(676,934	)		146,474			659,661			945,812			674,573			1,048,584			2,180,541

Other income (expense):
Interest income		11,016			70,329			82,462			101,546			268,383			587,973			533,976			591,890
Interest expense		(325	)		(1,488	)		(1,915	)		(1,926	)		(1,860	)		(1,600	)		(1,933	)		(2,070	)
Adjustment to fair value of redemption obligation		55,250			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Other		3,644			—			—			—			4,000			—			—			—

Total other income		69,585			68,841			80,547			99,620			270,523			586,373			532,043			589,820


Income (loss) before provision for income taxes		(1,077,361	)		(608,093	)		227,021			759,281			1,216,335			1,260,946			1,580,627			2,770,361
Income tax expense (benefit)		(53,700	)		(147,103	)		82,787			151,957			478,933			470,656			871,277			1,099,597

Net income (loss)		(1,023,661	)		(460,990	)		144,234			607,324			737,402			790,290			709,350			1,670,764
Convertible preferred stock dividends		—			—			—			—			348,993			682,813			682,813			691,161
Accretion to redemption value of redeemable convertible preferred stock		402,679			17,751			—			—			—			—			—			—

Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders	$	(1,426,340	)	$	(478,741	)	$	144,234		$	607,324		$	388,409		$	107,477		$	26,537		$	979,603

⁽¹⁾ Excludes acquisition-related consideration, stock-based compensation and amortization of intangible assets
⁽²⁾ Components of acquisition-related retention consideration:
Service costs	$	15,826		$	14,604		$	14,185		$	71,970		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Sales and marketing		45,175			41,726			40,503			77,124			—			—			—			—
Product development		48,916			45,162			43,865			(1,996	)		—			—			—			—
General and administrative		23,019			21,232			20,645			(22,876	)		—			—			—			—
⁽³⁾ Components of stock-based compensation:
Service costs	$	4,050		$	2,250		$	2,250		$	2,250		$	1,800		$	132,834		$	(131,034	)	$	900
Sales and marketing		67,546			49,042			7,573			31,573			29,507			285,924			437,983			354,766
Product development		21,902			12,675			12,653			12,653			10,665			137,985			(125,895	)		6,040
General and administrative		267,266			171,267			102,929			122,641			104,566			(59,574	)		376,904			408,436
⁽⁴⁾ Components of amortization of acquired intangible assets from acquisitions:
Servicecosts	$	734,868		$	734,643		$	978,389		$	1,072,977		$	2,393,425		$	3,890,299		$	3,795,373		$	3,704,501
Sales and marketing		162,500			162,500			207,527			168,550			120,833			204,722			448,611			520,834
General and administrative		137,500			137,500			218,548			250,000			568,899			854,630			947,715			979,166


	Quarter ended
	Mar 31, 2004		June 30, 2004		Sept 30, 2004		Dec 31, 2004		Mar 31, 2005		June 30, 2005		Sept 30, 2005		Dec 31, 2005
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
Revenue	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%

Expenses:
Service costs	62.9		64.8		62.4		61.5		58.0		50.7		52.3		47.2
Sales and marketing	13.3		11.6		9.5		8.0		7.2		7.3		10.8		14.7
Product development	6.7		6.0		4.9		4.3		4.2		6.1		4.5		4.1
General and administrative	9.1		9.6		8.8		9.9		7.9		7.0		5.8		6.5
Acquisition-related retention consideration	1.7		1.4		1.0		0.8		—		—		—		—
Facility relocation	3.0		—		(0.2	)	—		—		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation	4.7		2.7		1.0		1.1		0.8		2.3		2.2		2.6
Amortization of intangible assets from acquisitions	13.6		11.7		11.5		9.9		16.8		23.4		20.3		17.5

Total operating expenses	115.1		107.6		98.8		95.6		94.9		96.8		95.9		92.7

Gain on sales of intangible assets, net	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		0.0
Income (loss) from operations	(15.1	)	(7.6	)	1.2		4.4		5.1		3.2		4.1		7.3

Other income (expense):
Interest income	0.1		0.8		0.7		0.7		1.5		2.8		2.1		2.0
Interest expense	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Adjustment to fair value of redemption obligation	— 0.7		— —		— —		— —		— —		— —		— —		— —
Other	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total other income	0.9		0.8		0.7		0.7		1.5		2.8		2.1		2.0

Income (loss) before provision for income taxes	(14.2	)	(6.9	)	1.9		5.0		6.6		6.0		6.2		9.3
Income tax expense (benefit)	(0.7	)	(1.7	)	0.7		1.0		2.6		2.2		3.4		3.7

Net income (loss)	(13.5	)	(5.2	)	1.2		4.0		4.0		3.8		2.8		5.6
Convertible preferred stock dividends	—		—		—		—		1.9		3.2		2.7		2.3
Accretion to redemption value of redeemable convertible preferred stock	5.3		0.2		—		—		—		—		—		—

Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders	(18.8	)	(5.4	)	1.2		4.0		2.1		0.6		0.1		3.3

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On April 5, 2004, we completed our initial public offering of 4.6 million shares of Class B common stock. The proceeds received in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004 from the stock offering, net of cash offering expenses and underwriter discounts, were $27.2 million. All of the net proceeds have been used to pay for product and business development, acquisitions and strategic relationships, capital expenditures, personnel, facilities, earn-out obligations, working capital and other general corporate purposes. On April 5, 2004, all of our outstanding shares of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock, with a value of $21.8 million, were automatically converted into Class B common stock in connection with the closing of our initial public offering and are now included as components of stockholders’ equity.

In February 2005, we closed a follow-on offering of 9,200,000 shares of Class B common stock at a public offering price of $20.00 per share and 230,000 shares of 4.75% convertible exchangeable preferred stock at a public offering price of $250 per share and with a liquidation preference of $250 per share. These amounts include the exercise by our underwriters of their over-allotment option to purchase 1,200,000 additional shares of Class B common stock and 30,000 additional shares of preferred stock. The common stock and preferred stock proceeds, net of total offering costs of $12.2 million, were estimated to be approximately $174.1 million and $55.3 million, respectively, for an aggregate amount of $229.4 million. Concurrent with the close of our offerings, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of Name Development, a corporation operating in the

direct navigation market, for purchase consideration of $164.4 million, including approximately $155.6 million in cash and estimated acquisition costs and approximately 419,659 shares of our Class B common stock valued (for accounting purposes) at an aggregate amount of approximately $8.8 million. Net proceeds have been used to fund the Name Development asset acquisition, the Pike Street asset acquisition and the IndustryBrains acquisition and for working capital and other general corporate purposes. We intend to use the remainder of the net proceeds for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including for future acquisitions.

As of December 31, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents of $63.1 million. As of December 31, 2005, we had contractual obligations of $4.7 million of which $3.6 million is for rent under our facility leases.

Cash provided by operating activities primarily consists of net income (loss) adjusted for certain non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization, tax benefit from stock options, facility relocation amounts, deferred income taxes and changes in working capital. Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2005 of approximately $17.5 million consisted primarily of net income of $3.9 million adjusted for non-cash items of $26.8 million, including depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, allowance for doubtful accounts and merchant advertiser credits, stock-based compensation, deferred income taxes and income tax benefit related to stock options and approximately $13.3 million used in working capital, other activities and for increases in restricted cash for credit card authorization agencies. Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2004 of approximately $3.7 million consisted primarily of a net loss of $733,000 adjusted for non-cash items of $6.5 million, including depreciation and amortization of intangible assets, allowance for doubtful accounts and merchant advertiser credits, stock-based compensation, deferred income taxes, and income tax benefit related to stock options and approximately $2.0 million used by working capital, and other activities.

With respect to a significant portion of our pay-per-click advertising services, we receive payment prior to our delivery of related click-throughs. Our corresponding payments to the distribution partners who provide placement for the listings are generally made only after our delivery of a click-through. In most cases, the amount payable to the distribution partner will be calculated at the end of a calendar month, with a payment period following the delivery of the click-throughs. This payment structure results in a lag period between the earlier receipt of the cash from the merchant advertisers and the later payment to the distribution partners. These services constituted the majority of revenue in the 2004 and 2005 periods.

Nearly all of the feed management services and advertising services provider arrangements are billed on a monthly basis following the month of our click-through delivery. This payment structure results in our advancement of monies to the distribution partners who have provided the corresponding placements of the listings. For these services, merchant advertiser’s payments are generally received one to three weeks following payment to the distribution partners. We expect that in the future periods, if the feed management services account for a greater percentage of our operating activity, working capital requirements will increase as a result.

Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2005 of approximately $208.9 million was primarily attributable to the payment of the Name Development asset acquisition for approximately $155.5 million, the payment of the Pike Street asset acquisition for approximately $12.8 million, the payment of the IndustryBrains acquisition for approximately $16.1 million which is net of cash acquired of $1.1 million, the 2004 Enhance Interactive earn-out consideration payment of $5.7 million, purchases for Internet domain names or Web sites of approximately $12.6 million, payment for a prepaid license of $4.5 million and net purchases for property and equipment of $2.5 million offset by proceeds of $942,000 from the sales of intangible assets. Cash used in investing activities for the 2004 period of approximately $12.5 million was primarily attributable to the payment of the goClick acquisition for approximately $7.5 million net of cash acquired, the 2003 Enhance earn-out consideration payment of approximately $3.2 million, purchases of property and equipment of $1.0 million, and purchases of Internet domain names or Web sites of approximately $697,000.

As a result of our acquisitions, we increased our property and equipment purchases for items such as network equipment and software, furniture, software and equipment for our personnel, and systems used to sell to and serve merchant advertisers. As our operations increase, we expect property and equipment purchases will increase as we continue to invest in equipment and software for our systems and personnel. Additionally, we have expended amounts for product development initiatives as well as amounts recorded as part of property and equipment for internally developed software. We expect our expenditures for product development initiatives and internally developed software will increase in absolute dollars as our development activities accelerate and we increase the number of personnel and consultants to enhance our service offerings.

Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2005 of approximately $229.6 million was primarily attributable to net proceeds from the follow-on offering in February 2005 of approximately $229.4 million, net proceeds of approximately $2.2 million from the sale of stock through employee stock options and employee stock purchase plan offset by preferred dividend payments of $2.1 million. Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2004 of approximately $27.7 million was primarily attributable to net proceeds from our initial public offering.

For purposes of the calculations of the contingent earnings and revenue-based payment obligations for Enhance Interactive and TrafficLeader, we allocated revenue based on the source of revenue. We attributed revenue from products and services originating with Enhance Interactive to Enhance Interactive, and likewise we attributed revenue from products and services originating with TrafficLeader to TrafficLeader. Consistent with that approach, we allocated revenues based on origination of merchant advertiser and distribution partner relationships and agreements.

For calendar year 2004, the total aggregate Enhance Interactive contingent, earnings-based payment obligation was $6.2 million. This payment obligation includes the earn-out consideration of approximately $5.7 million and the retention-related consideration of approximately $499,000 for calendar year 2004. The amounts for the calendar year 2004 were paid in March 2005. Subsequent to December 31, 2004, no further obligation exists related to the Enhance Interactive earn-out and retention-related consideration.

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005, and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods.


	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		4-5 years
Contractual Obligations:
Operating leases	$	3,550,728	$	1,118,658	$	1,631,315	$	800,755
Capital leases		70,660		18,337		36,674		15,649
Other contractual obligations		1,044,469		883,149		145,320		16,000

Total contractual obligations ^(1),(2),(3)	$	4,665,857	$	2,020,144	$	1,813,309	$	832,404

⁽¹⁾

InFebruary 2005 we entered into (i) a new master agreement with Overture with respect to our direct navigation business, and (ii) a license agreement with Overture with respect to certain of Overture’s patents, including but not limited to U.S. Patent No. 6,269,361, pursuant to which we paid $4.5 million (and an additional $674,000 in certain circumstances), in an upfront payment and a contingent royalty based on a discounted rate of 3% (3.75% under certain circumstances) of certain of our gross revenues payable on a quarterly basis through December 2016. The upfront license fee has been capitalized and is being amortized ratably over 42 months. The royalty payment is recognized as incurred in service costs. The royalty payments are not included in the above schedule.

⁽²⁾

Under the termsof the preferred stock offering in February 2005, we have a quarterly dividend payment obligation. Dividends are cumulative and payable quarterly on the 15th day of February, May, August and November, commencing May 15, 2005 at an annual rate of $11.875 per preferred share. Any dividends must be declared by our board of directors and must come from funds which are legally available for dividend payments.

⁽³⁾	FromJanuary 1, 2006 through March 29, 2006, the Company incurred other contractual obligations related to minimum contractual payments due to distribution partners totaling approximately $796,000. These commitments relate to 2006 and 2007 and are not included in the above table.

During 2005, we paid approximately $12.6 million for the purchase of additional Internet domains or Web sites. We expect to continue acquiring Internet domains or Web sites in the normal course of business as we grow our presence in the field of direct navigation.

We anticipate that we will need to invest working capital towards the development and expansion of our overall operations. We may also make a significant number of acquisitions, which could result in the reduction of our cash balances or the incurrence of debt. We have allocated a portion of net proceeds from our offerings to fund acquisitions. Furthermore, we expect that capital expenditures may increase in future periods, particularly if our operating activity increases.

We will have an annual dividend payment obligation under the terms of the preferred stock of $1.7 million based upon approximately 142,037 convertible preferred shares outstanding as of March 16, 2006. Dividends are cumulative and payable quarterly on the 15^th day of February, May, August and November, commencing May 15, 2005 at an annual rate of $11.875 per preferred share.

Under Delaware law, dividends to stockholders may be made only from the surplus of a company, or, in certain situations, from the net profits for the current fiscal year before the dividend is declared by the board of directors. If we were to exchange the preferred stock for debentures, we would assume the principal and interest payment obligations under the terms of the debentures. Our ability to pay dividends under the preferred stock or to make payments of principal and interest under the debentures in the future will depend on our financial results, liquidity and financial condition.

On July 7, 2005, a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-125372) relating to the resale of 1,382,093 shares of our Class B common stock by certain selling stockholders with S-3 or piggyback registration rights granted principally in connection with our prior acquisitions was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission. We are contractually required to use best efforts to keep this Registration Statement effective until April 26, 2006. We will not receive any proceeds in connection with these sales by selling stockholders.

On September 29, 2005, a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-128317) relating to the resale of 964,955 shares of our Class B common stock by certain selling stockholders with S-3 registration rights granted in connection with the IndustryBrains acquisition was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission. We are contractually required to use best efforts to keep this Registration Statement effective for a period of one year from the date the Registration Statement became effective (plus the period of time, if any, during which sales may be suspended while the suspension right is in effect). We will not receive any proceeds in connection with these sales by selling stockholders.

Based on our operating plans we believe that the proceeds from our follow-on public offering, together with existing resources and cash flow provided by ongoing operations, will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least twelve months. Additional equity and debt financing may be needed to support our acquisition strategy, our long-term obligations and our company’s needs. If additional financing is necessary, it may not be available; and if it is available, it may not be possible for us to obtain financing on satisfactory terms. Failure to generate sufficient revenue or raise additional capital could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern and to achieve our intended business objectives.

Critical Accounting Policies

The policies below are critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. In the ordinary course of business, we make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of our results.

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make

estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Our critical accounting policies relate to the following matters and are described below:

•

Revenue;

•

Goodwill and intangible assets;

•

Stock-based compensation; and

•

Allowance for doubtful accounts, merchant advertiser and incentive program credits.

Revenue

We currently generate revenue through our operating businesses by delivering performance-based and search marketing services to merchant advertisers and advertising service providers. The primary revenue driver has been performance-based advertising, which includes pay-per-click listings, feed management services, and cost-per-action services. For pay-per-click listing and feed management services, revenue is recognized upon our delivery of qualified and reported click-throughs to our merchant advertisers or advertising service providers’ listing which occurs when an online user clicks on any of their advertisements after it has been placed by us or by our distribution partners. Each click-through on an advertisement listing represents a completed transaction. For cost-per-action services, revenue is recognized when the online user is redirected from the Company Web sites to an advertiser Web site and completes the specified action. In certain cases, we record revenue based on available and reported preliminary information from third parties. Collection on the related receivables may vary from reported information based upon third party refinement of the estimated and reported amounts owing that occurs subsequent to period ends.

We have entered into agreements with various distribution partners in order to expand our distribution network, which includes search engines, directories, product shopping engines and other Web sites on which we include our merchant advertisers’ listings. We generally pay distribution partners based on a specified percentage of revenue or a fixed amount per click-through on these listings. We act as the primary obligor in these transactions, and we are responsible for providing customer and administrative services to the merchant advertiser. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 99-19, “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an Agent,” the revenue derived from merchant advertisers who receive paid introductions through us as supplied by distribution partners is reported gross based upon the amounts received from the merchant advertiser. We also recognize revenue for certain agency contracts with merchant advertisers under the net revenue recognition method. Under these specific agreements, we purchase listings on behalf of merchant advertisers from search engines and directories. We are paid an agency fee based on the total amount of the purchase made on behalf of these merchant advertisers. Under these agreements, our merchant advertisers are primarily responsible for choosing the publisher and determining pricing, and the Company, in certain instances, is only financially liable to the publisher for the amount collected from our merchant advertisers. This creates a sequential liability for media purchases made on behalf of merchant advertisers. In certain instances, the web publishers engage the merchant advertisers directly and we are paid an agency fee based on the total amount of the purchase made by the merchant advertiser.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations accounted for under the purchase method.

We apply the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS 142). Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142. SFAS 142 also requires that intangible assets with definite useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Asset” (SFAS 144).

Goodwill is tested annually for impairment and is tested for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value. To date, no impairment charge has been taken for the goodwill related to our acquisitions. If the fair value is lower than the carrying value, a material impairment charge may be reported in our financial results. We exercise judgment in the assessment of the related useful lives of intangible assets, the fair values and the recoverability. In certain instances, the fair value is determined in part based on cash flow forecasts and discount rate estimates. We review our long-lived assets for impairment in accordance with SFAS 144 whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If such asset group is considered to be impaired, the impairment is to be recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds fair value. Assets to be disposed of are separately presented on the balance sheet and reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated.

No impairment of significance of our intangible assets has been indicated to date. To the extent such evaluation indicates that the useful lives of intangible assets are different than originally estimated, the amortization period is reduced or extended and, accordingly, the quarterly amortization expense is increased or decreased.

As a result of the significance of the goodwill and intangible asset carrying values, any impairment charges or changes to the estimated amortization periods could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

Stock-Based Compensation

Our stock-based compensation plan is described more fully in Note 1(m) to the consolidated financial statements. We account for the plan under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” (APB 25) and related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation,” an interpretation of APB 25 issued in March 2000, to account for our employee stock options. Under this method, employee compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the fair market value of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (SFAS 123) established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans.

As allowed by SFAS 123, we have elected to continue to apply the intrinsic value-based method of accounting described above for options granted to employees, and have adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123. We recognize compensation expense over the vesting period utilizing the accelerated methodology described in Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 28, “Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans.” We account for non-employee stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123 and EITF No. 96-18.

We used variable plan accounting to account for options to purchase 125,000 shares of our Class B common stock issued under our stock incentive plan that were held in escrow as security for the indemnification obligations under the Enhance Interactive merger agreement. These options were subject to forfeiture, until the

expiration of the escrow period which was February 28, 2004, and, accordingly, we were required to record a compensation charge on a quarterly basis, which lowered our earnings. Under variable plan accounting, compensation expense is measured quarterly as the amount by which the fair market value of the shares of our Class B common stock covered by the option grant exceeds the exercise price and is recognized over the option’s vesting period. Increases or decreases in the fair market value of our Class B common stock between the date of grant and the date of exercise result in a corresponding increase or decrease in the measure of compensation expense. The amount of stock-based compensation recognized was derived based upon our determination of the fair value of our Class B common stock. We determined the fair value of our Class B common stock based upon a variety of factors, including our operating performance, issuance of our convertible preferred stock, liquidation preference of our preferred stock, and valuations of other publicly-traded companies.

The amount of compensation expense actually recognized in future periods could be lower than currently anticipated if unvested stock options for which deferred compensation has been recorded are forfeited. In addition, if we used different assumptions to determine the deemed fair value of our Class B common stock, we could have reported materially different amounts of stock-based compensation. We currently are not required to record stock-based compensation charges if the employee stock option exercise price or restricted stock purchase price equals or exceeds the deemed fair value of our common stock at the date of grant. Recent changes to applicable accounting standards will require us to record the fair value of options as an expense commencing January 1, 2006. If we had estimated the fair value of options on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes pricing model, and then amortized this estimated fair value over the vesting period of the options, our net income (loss) would have been adversely affected. See Note 1(m) – “Stock Option Plan” and Note 1(s) – “Recently Issued Accounting Standards” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements and elsewhere in this Form 10-KSB for a discussion of how our net income (loss) would be adversely affected.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Merchant Advertiser and Incentive Program Credits

Accounts receivable balances are presented net of allowance for doubtful accounts and merchant advertiser credits. The allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our accounts receivable. We determine our allowance based on analysis of historical bad debts, advertiser concentrations, advertiser creditworthiness and current economic trends. We review the allowance for collectibility on a quarterly basis. Account balances are written off against the allowance after all reasonable means of collection have been exhausted and the potential recovery is considered remote. If the financial condition of our advertisers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, or if we underestimated the allowances required, additional allowances may be required which would result in increased general and administrative expenses in the period such determination was made.

We determine our allowance for merchant advertiser credits and adjustments based upon our analysis of historical credits. Under the merchant advertiser incentive program, we grant merchant advertisers credits depending upon the individual amounts of prepayments made. The incentive program allowance is determined based on the historical rate of incentives earned and used by merchant advertisers compared to the related revenues recognized by us. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our revenue for any period if our management made different judgments and estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 123-R (SFAS 123R), Share-Based Payment, which replaces SFAS No. 123 (SFAS 123) and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25 (APB 25). As originally issued, SFAS 123 established as preferable a fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. However, that pronouncement permitted entities to continue applying the intrinsic-value-based model of APB 25, provided that the financial statements disclosed the pro forma net income or loss based on the preferable fair-value method.

We adopted the provisions of SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006. Thus, our consolidated financial statements will reflect an expense for (a) all share-based compensation arrangements granted after January 1, 2006 and for any such arrangements that are modified, cancelled, or repurchased after that date, and (b) the portion of previous share-based awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered as of that date, based on the grant-date estimated fair value of those awards. See Note 1(m), “Stock Option Plan” for the pro forma net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share amounts, for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, as if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to measure compensation cost for employee stock incentive awards. Upon adoption during the quarter ended March 31, 2006, we will recognize stock-based compensation using the modified prospective method and expect the adoption to have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements. The magnitude of this impact will depend on a number of factors, including the timing and magnitude of new stock awards, the number and type of new awards, changes in the market price or volatility of our Class B common stock and preferred stock, as well as unanticipated changes in our workforce.

We will recognize stock-based compensation after the date of adoption of SFAS 123R using the straight-line method for all stock awards issued after January 1, 2006, which will result in the recognition of less stock-based compensation over at least the next several years compared to that which would have been recognized had we continued to use the accelerated method.

SFAS 123R requires that the deferred stock-based compensation on our consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity on the date of adoption be netted against paid-in capital. At December 31, 2005, we had $3.0 million of deferred stock-based compensation on our consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity.

SFAS 123R also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense to be reported as a cash flow from financing activities, rather than as a cash flow from operating activities, as was prescribed under accounting rules applicable through December 31, 2005 and presented as tax benefits from stock-based award activity on the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. This requirement will likely significantly reduce and increase the amounts we record as net cash provided by operating activities and net cash provided by financing activities, respectively. Total cash flow will remain unchanged from what would have been reported under prior accounting rules.

In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. In accordance with this Bulletin, effective January 1, 2006 we will no longer present stock-based compensation separately on our statements of income. Instead we will present stock-based compensation in the same lines as cash compensation paid to the same individuals.

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”, a replacement of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes”, and Statement No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements” (SFAS 154). The new statement changes the requirements for the accounting for, and reporting of, a change in accounting principle. Previously, voluntary changes in accounting principles were generally required to be recognized by way of a cumulative effect adjustment within net income during the period of the change. SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005; however, the statement does not change the transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements.

RISK FACTORS

Risks Relating to Our Company

Our limited operating history makes evaluation of our business difficult.

We were formally incorporated in January 2003. We acquired Enhance Interactive in February 2003, TrafficLeader in October 2003 and goClick in July 2004. In February and April 2005, we completed the acquisitions of certain assets of Name Development and Pike Street Industries, respectively. In July 2005 we completed the acquisition of IndustryBrains.

We have limited historical financial data upon which to base planned operating expenses or forecast accurately our future operating results. Further, our limited operating history will make it difficult for investors and securities analysts to evaluate our business and prospects. Our failure to address these risks and difficulties successfully could seriously harm us.

We have largely incurred net losses since our inception, and we may incur net losses in the foreseeable future.

We had an accumulated deficit of $2.8 million as of December 31, 2005. While we recently achieved profitability, we may not be able to sustain it. Our net expenses may increase based on the initiatives we undertake which for instance, may include increasing our sales and marketing activities, hiring additional personnel, incurring additional costs as a result of being a public company, and acquiring additional businesses. In addition, commencing January 1, 2006, we are required to expense the fair value of stock options granted.

We are dependent on certain distribution partners, including Yahoo! and its subsidiaries, for distribution of our services, and we derive a significant portion of our total revenue through these distribution partners. A loss of distribution partners or a decrease in revenue from certain distribution partners could adversely affect our business. Yahoo! is also a significant customer.

A relatively small number of distribution partners currently deliver a significant percentage of traffic to our merchant listings. Yahoo! Search Marketing is our largest distribution partner and delivers traffic to our merchant listings which collectively represents approximately 11% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005. Separately, Yahoo! Search Marketing was responsible for 23% of our total revenue during the same period principally in respect of the revenues associated with our portfolio of domains.

Our existing agreements with many of our larger distribution partners permit either company to terminate without penalty on short notice and are primarily structured on a variable-payment basis, under which we make payments based on a specified percentage of revenue or based on the number of paid click-throughs. We intend to continue devoting resources in support of our larger distribution partners, but there are no guarantees that these relationships will remain in place over the short- or long-term. In addition, we cannot be assured that any of these distribution partners will continue to generate current levels of revenue for us or that we will be able to maintain the applicable variable payment terms at their current levels. A loss of any of these distribution partners or a decrease in revenue due to lower traffic or less favorable variable payment terms from any one of these distribution relationships could have an adverse effect on our revenue, and the loss of any one large distribution partner could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Companies distributing advertising on the Internet have experienced, and will likely continue to experience, consolidation. This consolidation has reduced the number of partners that control the online advertising outlets with the most user traffic. According to the comScore Media Metrix qSearch report for November 2005, Yahoo! Search accounted for 30% of the online searches in the United States and Google accounted for 40%. As a result, the larger distribution partners have greater control over determining the market terms of distribution, including placement of merchant advertisements and cost of placement. In addition, many participants in the performance- based advertising and search marketing industries control significant portions of the traffic that they deliver to

advertisers. We do not believe, for example, that Yahoo! and Google are as reliant as we are on a third-party distribution network to deliver their services. This gives these companies a significant advantage over us in delivering their services, and with a lesser degree of risk.

We may incur liabilities for the activities of our merchant advertisers, distribution partners and other users of our services, which could adversely affect our business.

Many of our advertisement generation and distribution processes are automated. In most cases, merchant advertisers use our online tools and account management systems to create and submit merchant listings. These merchant listings are submitted in a bulk data feed to our distribution partners. Although we monitor our distribution partners on an ongoing basis primarily for traffic quality, these partners control the distribution of the merchant listings provided in the data feed.

As a result, we do not conduct a manual editorial review of a substantial number of our merchant listings, nor do we manually review the display of the vast majority of the merchant listings by our distribution partners. We may not successfully avoid liability for unlawful activities carried out by our merchant advertisers and other users of our services or unpermitted uses of our merchant listings by distribution partners and their affiliates.

Our potential liability for unlawful activities of our merchant advertisers and other users of our services or unpermitted uses of our merchant listings by distribution partners could require us to implement measures to reduce our exposure to such liability, which may require us, among other things, to spend substantial resources, to discontinue certain service offerings or to terminate certain distribution partner relationships. For example, as a result of the actions of merchant advertisers in our network, we may be subject to civil claims relating to a wide variety of issues, such as privacy, gambling, promotions, and intellectual property ownership and infringement. Under agreements with certain of our larger distribution partners, we may be required to indemnify these distribution partners against liabilities or losses resulting from the content of our merchant listings. Although our merchant advertisers indemnify us with respect to claims arising from these listings, we may not be able to recover all or any of the liabilities or losses incurred by us as a result of the activities of our merchant advertisers.

We have a large number of distribution partners who display our merchant listings on their networks. Our merchant listings are predominantly delivered to our distribution partners in an automated fashion through an XML data feed or data dump. Our distribution partners are required contractually to use the merchant listings that we provide in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and in conformity with our publication restrictions included in our agreements, which are intended to promote the quality and validity of the traffic provided to our merchant advertisers. Nonetheless, we do not operationally control or manage these distribution partners and any breach of these agreements on the part of any distribution partner or its affiliates could result in liability for our business. These agreements include indemnification obligations on the part of our distribution partners, but there is no assurance that we would be able to collect against offending distribution partners or their affiliates in the event of a claim under these indemnification provisions.

Our insurance policies may not provide coverage for liability arising out of activities of users of our services. Furthermore, we may not be able to obtain or maintain adequate insurance coverage to reduce or limit the liabilities associated with our businesses. Any costs incurred as a result of such liability or asserted liability could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

If we do not maintain and grow a critical mass of merchant advertisers and distribution partners, the value of our services could be adversely affected.

Our success depends, in large part, on the maintenance and growth of a critical mass of merchant advertisers and distribution partners and a continued interest in our performance-based advertising and search marketing services. Merchant advertisers will generally seek the most competitive return on investment from advertising and marketing services. Distribution partners will also seek the most favorable payment terms available in the

market. Merchant advertisers and distribution partners may change providers or the volume of business with a provider, unless the product and terms are competitive. In this environment, we must compete to acquire and maintain our network of merchant advertisers and distribution partners.

If our business is unable to maintain and grow our base of merchant advertisers, our current distribution partners may be discouraged from continuing to work with us, and this may create obstacles for us to enter into agreements with new distribution partners. Similarly, if our distribution network does not grow and does not continue to improve over time, current and prospective merchant advertisers may reduce or terminate their business with us. Any decline in the number of merchant advertisers and distribution partners could adversely affect the value of our services.

We are dependent upon the quality of traffic in our network to provide value to our merchant advertisers, and any failure in our quality control could have a material adverse effect on the value of our services to our merchant advertisers and adversely affect our revenues.

We utilize certain monitoring processes with respect to the quality of the traffic that we deliver to our merchant advertisers. Among the factors we seek to monitor are sources and causes of low quality clicks such as non-human processes, including robots, spiders or other software, the mechanical automation of clicking, and other types of invalid clicks, click fraud, or click spam, the purpose of which is something other than to view the underlying content. Additionally, we also seek to identify other indicators which may suggest that a user may not be targeted by or desirable to our merchant advertisers. Even with such monitoring in place, there is a risk that a certain amount of low-quality traffic or traffic that is deemed to be less valuable by our merchant advertisers will be delivered to such merchant advertisers, which may be detrimental to those relationships. Low-quality traffic may further prevent us from growing our base of merchant advertisers and cause us to lose relationships with existing merchant advertisers which could adversely affect our revenues.

We may be subject to intellectual property claims, which could adversely affect our financial condition and ability to use certain critical technologies, divert our resources and management attention from our business operations and create uncertainty about ownership of technology essential to our business.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect our intellectual property and to operate without infringing on the intellectual property rights of others in the process. There can be no guarantee that any of our intellectual property will be adequately safeguarded, or that it will not be challenged by third parties. We may be subject to patent infringement claims or other intellectual property infringement claims, including claims of trademark infringement in connection with our acquisition of previously-owned Internet domain names, that would be costly to defend and could limit our ability to use certain critical technologies.

Any patent or other intellectual property litigation could negatively impact our business by diverting resources and management attention from other aspects of the business and adding uncertainty as to the ownership of technology, services and property that we view as proprietary and essential to our business. In addition, a successful claim of patent infringement against us and our failure or inability to license the infringed or similar technology on reasonable terms, or at all, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may need additional funding to meet our obligations and to pursue our business strategy. Additional funding may not be available to us and our financial condition could therefore be adversely affected.

We may require additional funding to meet our ongoing obligations and to pursue our business strategy, which may include the selective acquisition of businesses and technologies. In addition, we have incurred and we may incur certain obligations in the future, including:

•

In February 2005, we entered into agreements with Overture, pursuant to which we paid $4.5 million in an upfront payment (and an additional $674,000 in certain circumstances) and a contingent royalty based on 3.0% (3.75% under certain circumstances) of certain of our gross revenues payable on a quarterly basis through December 2016.

•

We are obligated to pay quarterly dividends to the holders of preferred stock at an annual rate of $11.875 per preferred share. There are currently approximately 142,137 shares of preferred stock outstanding following the conversions into shares of Class B common stock that have occurred to date.

•

If debentures are issued upon exchange of the preferred stock, we will become obligated to make interest payments to the holders of the debentures.

There can be no assurance that if we were to need additional funds to meet these obligations that additional financing arrangements would be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Furthermore, if adequate additional funds are not available, we will be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate material parts of the implementation of our business strategy, including potential additional acquisitions or internally-developed businesses.

Our acquisitions could divert management’s attention, cause ownership dilution to our stockholders, cause our earnings to decrease and be difficult to integrate.

Our business strategy includes identifying, structuring, completing and integrating acquisitions. Acquisitions in the technology and Internet sectors involve a high degree of risk. We may also be unable to find a sufficient number of attractive opportunities to meet our objectives which include revenue growth, profitability and competitive market share. Our acquired companies may have histories of net losses and may expect net losses for the foreseeable future.

Acquisitions are accompanied by a number of risks that could harm our business, operating results and financial condition:

•

We could experience a substantial strain on our resources, including time and money, and we may not be successful;

•

Our management’s attention could be diverted from our ongoing business concerns;

•

While integrating new companies, we may lose key executives or other employees of these companies;

•

We may issue shares of our Class B common stock as consideration for acquisitions which may result in ownership dilution to our stockholders;

•

We could fail to successfully integrate our financial and management controls, technology, reporting systems and procedures, or adequately expand, train and manage our workforce;

•

We could experience customer dissatisfaction or performance problems with an acquired company or technology;

•

We could become subject to unknown or underestimated liabilities of an acquired entity or incur unexpected expenses or losses from such acquisitions;

•

We could incur possible impairment charges related to goodwill or other intangible assets or other unanticipated events or circumstances, any of which could harm our business; and

•

We may be exposed to investigations and/or audits by federal, state or other taxing authorities.

Consequently, we might not be successful in integrating any acquired businesses, products or technologies, and might not achieve anticipated revenue and cost benefits.

The loss of our senior management, including our founding executive officers, could harm our current and future operations and prospects.

We are heavily dependent upon the continued services of Russell C. Horowitz, our chairman and chief executive officer, and John Keister, our president and chief operating officer, and the other members of our

senior management team. Each member of our senior management team is an at-will employee and may voluntarily terminate his employment with us at any time with minimal notice. Russell C. Horowitz, Ethan A. Caldwell, Peter Christothoulou and John Keister, our founding executive officers, each own shares of fully vested Class A common stock. Following any termination of employment, each of these employees would only be subject to a twelve-month non-competition and non-solicitation obligation with respect to our clients and customers under our standard confidentiality agreement.

Further, as of December 31, 2005, Russell C. Horowitz, Ethan A. Caldwell, Peter Christothoulou and John Keister together controlled 89% of the combined voting power of our outstanding capital stock excluding shares of Class B common stock issuable upon conversion of preferred stock. Their collective voting control is not tied to their continued employment with Marchex. The loss of the services of any member of our senior management, including our founding executive officers, for any reason, or any conflict among our founding executive officers, could harm our current and future operations and prospects.

We may have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified, experienced, highly skilled personnel, which could adversely affect the implementation of our business plan.

In order to fully implement our business plan, we will need to attract and retain additional qualified personnel. Thus, our success will in significant part depend upon the efforts of personnel not yet identified and upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, engineering, sales and marketing personnel. We are also dependent on managerial and technical personnel to the extent they may have knowledge or information about our businesses and technical systems that may not be known by our other personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract and retain necessary personnel. The failure to hire and retain such personnel could adversely affect the implementation of our business plan.

If we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate insurance, our financial condition could be adversely affected in the event of uninsured or inadequately insured loss or damage. Our ability to effectively recruit and retain qualified officers and directors may also be adversely affected if we experience difficulty in maintaining adequate directors’ and officers’ liability insurance.

We may not be able to obtain and maintain insurance policies on terms affordable to us that would adequately insure our business and property against damage, loss or claims by third parties. To the extent our business or property suffers any damages, losses or claims by third parties that are not covered or adequately covered by insurance, our financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

We currently have directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. If we are unable to maintain sufficient insurance as a public company to cover liability claims made against our officers and directors, we may not be able to retain or recruit qualified officers and directors to manage our company, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

New rules, including those contained in and issued under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, may make it difficult for us to retain or attract qualified officers and directors, which could adversely affect our business and our ability to maintain the listing of our Class B common stock and preferred stock on the Nasdaq National Market.

We may be unable to attract and retain qualified officers, directors and members of board committees required to provide for our effective management as a result of the recent and currently proposed changes in the rules and regulations which govern publicly-held companies, including, but not limited to, certifications from executive officers and requirements for financial experts on boards of directors. The perceived increased personal risk associated with these recent changes may deter qualified individuals from accepting these roles. The enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has resulted in the issuance of a series of new rules and regulations and the strengthening of existing rules and regulations by the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as the adoption of new and more stringent rules by the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Further, certain of these recent and proposed changes heighten the requirements for board or committee membership, particularly with respect to an individual’s independence from the corporation and level of experience in finance and accounting matters. We may have difficulty attracting and retaining directors with the requisite qualifications. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified officers and directors, our business and our ability to maintain the listing of our shares of Class B common stock and preferred stock on the Nasdaq National Market could be adversely affected.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud, which could harm our brand and operating results.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable and accurate financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. We have devoted significant resources and time to comply with the new internal control over financial reporting requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In addition, Section 404 under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we assess and our auditors attest to the design and operating effectiveness of our controls over financial reporting. Our compliance with the annual internal control report requirement for our first fiscal year ending on or after July 15, 2006, the requisite SEC compliance date, will depend on the effectiveness of our financial reporting and data systems and controls across our operating subsidiaries. We expect these systems and controls to become increasingly complex to the extent that we integrate acquisitions and our business grows. To effectively manage this growth, we will need to continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls and our reporting systems and procedures. We cannot be certain that these measures will ensure that we design, implement and maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation or operation, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our financial reporting obligations. Inferior internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our stock and our access to capital.

Accounting for employee stock options using the fair value method could significantly reduce our net income.

We adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123R”) on January 1, 2006. Thus, our future consolidated financial statements will reflect the fair value of stock options granted to employees as a compensation expense, which will likely have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations and net income per share. We rely heavily on stock options to compensate existing employees and to attract new employees. If we reduce or alter our use of stock-based compensation to minimize the recognition of these expenses, our ability to recruit, motivate and retain employees may be impaired, which could put us at a competitive disadvantage in the employee marketplace. In order to prevent any net decrease in their overall compensation packages, we may choose to make corresponding increases in the cash compensation or other incentives we pay to existing and new employees. Any increases in employee wages and salaries would diminish our cash available for marketing, product development and other uses and might cause our GAAP profits to decline. Any of these effects might cause the market price of our Class B common stock and preferred stock to decline.

Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets would result in a decrease in earnings.

Current accounting rules require that goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment at least annually. These rules also require that intangible assets with definite useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. To the extent such evaluation indicates that the useful lives of intangible assets are different than originally estimated, the amortization period is reduced or extended and, accordingly, the quarterly amortization expense is increased or decreased.

We have substantial goodwill and other intangible assets, and we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings in our financial statements during the period in which any impairment of our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets is determined. Any impairment charges or changes to the estimated amortization periods could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

We may not be able to realize the intended and anticipated benefits from our acquisitions of Internet domain names, which could affect the value of these acquisitions to our business and our ability to meet our financial obligations and targets.

We may not be able to realize the intended and anticipated benefits that we currently expect from our acquisitions of Internet domain names. These intended and anticipated benefits include increasing our cash flow from operations, broadening our distribution offerings and delivering services that strengthen our merchant relationships.

Factors that could affect our ability to achieve these benefits include:

•

A significant amount of revenue attributed to our domain name assets comes through our agreement with Yahoo! and its subsidiaries. Under our agreement, Yahoo! has certain limited exclusive and preferential rights with respect to the commercialization of these domain names and Web sites through paid listings. Yahoo! controls the delivery of a portion of the paid listings to these domain names and Web sites. As a result, the monetization of these Web sites will initially be largely dependent on the revenue from the paid listings allocated by Yahoo! and its subsidiaries to these Web sites. This allocation may depend on Yahoo!’s advertiser base, internal policies in effect from time to time, perceived quality of traffic, origin of traffic, history of performance and conversion, technical and network changes made by Yahoo!, among many factors and determinations which may or may not be controlled by us or known to us.

•

We will need to continue to acquire commercially valuable Internet domain names to grow our presence in the field of direct navigation. We will need to continuously improve our technologies to acquire valuable Internet domain names as competition in the marketplace for appropriate Internet domain names intensifies. Our domain name acquisition efforts are subject to rules and guidelines established by registries which maintain Internet domain name registrations and the registrars which process and facilitate Internet domain name registrations. The registries and registrars may change the rules and guidelines for acquiring Internet domains in ways that may prove detrimental to our domain acquisition efforts.

•

The business of direct navigation is dependent on current technologies and user practices. If browser or search technologies were to change significantly, the practice of direct navigation may be altered to our disadvantage.

•

Some of our existing distribution partners may perceive direct navigation as a competitive threat and therefore may decide to terminate their agreements with us because of our recent acquisitions of a substantial number of Internet domain names.

•

We intend to apply our technology and expertise to geography-specific Web sites that we believe are under-commercialized and not yet mature from a monetization perspective. However, if the current disparities in traffic and monetization of such search terms do not narrow in a favorable way, we may expend significant company resources on business efforts that do not realize the results we anticipate.

If the acquired assets are not integrated into our business as we anticipate, we may not be able to achieve these benefits or realize the value paid for the asset acquisitions, which could materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We do not control the means by which users access our direct navigation Web sites, and material changes to current navigation practices or technologies or marketing practices or significant increases in our marketing costs could result in a material adverse effect on our business.

The success of our direct navigation business depends in large part upon consumer access to our direct navigation Web sites. Consumers access our Web sites primarily through the following methods: directly accessing our Web sites by typing descriptive keywords or keyword strings into the uniform resource locator (URL) address box of an Internet browser; accessing our Web sites by clicking on bookmarked Web sites; and accessing our Web sites through search engines and directories.

Each of these methods requires the use of a third party product or service, such as an Internet browser or search engine or directory. Internet browsers may provide alternatives to the URL address box to locate Web sites, and search engines may from time to time change and establish rules regarding the indexing and optimization of Web sites. We may also purchase traffic to certain Web sites from search engines as part of our marketing efforts. Historically, we have purchased traffic to certain Web sites from less than five leading search engines. Product developments and market practices for these means of access to our Web sites are not within our control. We may experience a decline in traffic to our Web sites if third party browser technologies or search engine methodologies and rules, including those affecting marketing efforts, are changed to our disadvantage. We may also be forced to significantly increase marketing expenditures in the event that market prices for online advertising and paid-listings escalate. Any of these changes could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may experience unforeseen liabilities in connection with our acquisitions of Internet domain names, which could negatively impact our financial results.

The Name Development and Pike Street asset acquisitions involve the acquisition of a large number of previously-owned Internet domain names. Furthermore, we have separately acquired and intend to continue to acquire in the future additional previously-owned Internet domain names. In some cases, these acquired names may have trademark significance that is not readily apparent to us or is not identified by us in the bulk purchasing process. As a result we may face demands by third party trademark owners asserting infringement or dilution of their rights and seeking transfer of acquired Internet domain names under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy administered by ICANN or actions under the U.S. Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.

We intend to review each claim or demand which may arise from time to time on its merits on a case-by-case basis with the assistance of counsel and we intend to transfer any rights acquired by us to any party that has demonstrated a valid prior right or claim. We cannot, however, guarantee that we will be able to resolve these disputes without litigation. The potential violation of third party intellectual property rights and potential causes of action under consumer protection laws may subject us to unforeseen liabilities including injunctions and judgments for money damages.

Regulation could reduce the value of the Internet domain names acquired or negatively impact the Internet domain acquisition process, which could significantly impair the value attributable to our acquisitions of Internet domain names.

The Name Development business includes the registrations of thousands of Internet domain names both in the United States and internationally. Name Development acquired previously-owned Internet domain names that had expired and had been offered for sale by Internet domain name registrars following the period of permitted reclamation by their prior owners. Furthermore, we have separately acquired and intend to continue to acquire in the future additional previously-owned Internet domain names, including in connection with the Pike Street asset acquisition.

The acquisition of Internet domain names generally is governed by regulatory bodies. The regulation of Internet domain names in the United States and in foreign countries is subject to change. Regulatory bodies could establish additional requirements for previously-owned Internet domain names or modify the requirements for holding Internet domain names. As a result, we might not acquire or maintain names that contribute to our financial results in the same manner as reflected in the historical financial results of Name Development and Pike Street. Because certain Internet domain names are important assets, a failure to acquire or maintain such Internet domain names could adversely affect our financial results and our growth. Any impairment in the value of these important assets could cause our stock price to decline.

Risks Relating to Our Business and Our Industry

If we are unable to compete in the highly competitive performance-based advertising and search marketing industries, we may experience reduced demand for our products and services.

We operate in a highly competitive and changing environment. We principally compete with other companies which offer services in six main areas:

•

sales to merchant advertisers of pay-per-click services;

•

sales to merchant advertisers of feed management services;

•

aggregation or optimization of online advertising for distribution through search engines, product shopping engines, directories, Web sites or other outlets;

•

delivery of online advertising to end users or customers of merchants through destination Web sites or other distribution outlets;

•

services and outsourcing of technologies that allow merchants to manage their advertising campaigns across multiple networks and track the success of these campaigns; and

•

third party domain monetization.

Although we currently pursue a strategy that allows us to potentially partner with all relevant companies in the industry, there are certain companies in the industry that may not wish to partner with us. Despite the fact that we currently work with several of our potential competitors, there are no guarantees that these companies will continue to work with us in the future.

We currently or potentially compete with a variety of companies, including Miva (formerly known as FindWhat.com), Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! Many of these actual or perceived competitors also currently or may in the future have business relationships with us, particularly in distribution. Going forward, however, these companies may terminate their relationships with us. Furthermore, our competitors may be able to secure agreements with us on more favorable terms, which could reduce the usage of our services, increase the amount payable to our distribution partners, reduce total revenue and thereby have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We expect competition to intensify in the future because current and new competitors can enter our market with little difficulty. The barriers to entering our market are relatively low. In fact, many current Internet and media companies presently have the technical capabilities and advertiser bases to enter the search marketing services industry. Further, if the consolidation trend continues among the larger media and search engine companies with greater brand recognition, the share of the market remaining for smaller search marketing services providers could decrease, even though the number of smaller providers could continue to increase. These factors could adversely affect our competitive position in the search marketing services industry.

Some of our competitors, as well as potential entrants into our market, may be better positioned to succeed in this market. They may have:

•

longer operating histories;

•

more management experience;

•

an employee base with more extensive experience;

•

better geographic coverage;

•

larger customer bases;

•

greater brand recognition; and

•

significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources.

Currently, and in the future, as the use of the Internet and other online services increases, there will likely be larger, more well-established and well-financed entities that acquire companies and/or invest in or form joint ventures in categories or countries of interest to us, all of which could adversely impact our business. Any of these trends could increase competition and reduce the demand for any of our services.

If we are not able to respond to the rapid technological change characteristic of our industry, our products and services may cease to be competitive.

The market for our products and services is characterized by rapid change in business models and technological infrastructure, and we will need to constantly adapt to changing markets and technologies to provide new and competitive products and services. If we are unable to ensure that our users, advertisers, and distribution partners have a high-quality experience with our products and services, then they may become dissatisfied and move to competitors’ products and services. Accordingly, our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to develop and offer competitive products and services for both our target market and for applications in new markets. We may not, however, be able to successfully do so, and our competitors may develop innovations that render our products and services obsolete or uncompetitive.

Our technical systems are vulnerable to interruption and damage that may be costly and time-consuming to resolve and may harm our business and reputation.

A disaster could interrupt our services for an indeterminate length of time and severely damage our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Our systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from:

•

fire;

•

floods;

•

network failure;

•

hardware failure;

•

software failure;

•

power loss;

•

telecommunications failures;

•

break-ins;

•

terrorism, war or sabotage;

•

computer viruses;

•

denial of service attacks;

•

penetration of our network by unauthorized computer users and “hackers” and other similar events;

•

natural disaster; and

•

other unanticipated problems.

We may not have developed or implemented adequate protections or safeguards to overcome any of these events. We also may not have anticipated or addressed many of the potential events that could threaten or undermine our technology network. Any of these occurrences could cause material interruptions or delays in our business, result in the loss of data or render us unable to provide services to our customers. In addition, if a person is able to circumvent our security measures, he or she could destroy or misappropriate valuable information or disrupt our operations. We have deployed firewall hardware intended to thwart hacker attacks. Although we maintain property insurance and business interruption insurance, our insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur as a result of a catastrophic system failure or other loss, and our insurers may not be able or may decline to do so for a variety of reasons.

If we fail to address these issues in a timely manner, we may lose the confidence of our merchant advertisers and distribution partners, our revenue may decline and our business could suffer. In addition, as we expand our service offerings and enter into new business areas, we may be required to significantly modify and expand our software and technology platform. If we fail to accomplish these tasks in a timely manner, our business and reputation will likely suffer.

We rely on third party technology, server and hardware providers, and a failure of service by these providers could adversely affect our business and reputation.

We rely upon third party colocation providers to host our main servers. If these providers experience any interruption in operations or cease operations for any reason or if we are unable to agree on satisfactory terms for continued hosting relationships, we would be forced to enter into a relationship with other service providers or assume hosting responsibilities ourselves. If we are forced to switch hosting facilities, we may not be successful in finding an alternative service provider on acceptable terms or in hosting the computer servers ourselves. We may also be limited in our remedies against these providers in the event of a failure of service. In the past, we have experienced short-term outages in the service maintained by one of our current colocation providers. We also rely on third party providers for components of our technology platform, such as hardware and software providers, credit card processors and domain name registrars. A failure or limitation of service or available capacity by any of these third party providers could adversely affect our business and reputation.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights, which could result in our competitors marketing competing products and services utilizing our intellectual property and could adversely affect our competitive position.

Our success and ability to compete effectively are substantially dependent upon our internally developed and acquired technology and data resources, which we protect through a combination of copyright, trade secret, and patent and trademark law. To date, we have filed two provisional patent applications with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and two non-provisional patent applications based on the two filed provisional applications in the United States and via the Patent Cooperation Treaty designating all member countries. In the future, additional patents may be filed with respect to internally developed or acquired technologies. Our industry is highly competitive and many individuals and companies have sought to patent processes in the industry. In addition, the patent process takes several years and involves considerable expense. Further, patent applications and patent positions in our industry are highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions due in part to the number of competing technologies. As a result, we may not be able to successfully prosecute these patents, in whole or in part, or any additional patent filings that we may make in the future. We also depend on our trade name and domain names. We may not be able to adequately protect our technology and data resources. In addition, intellectual property laws vary from country to country, and it may be more difficult to protect our intellectual property in some foreign jurisdictions in which we may plan to enter. If we fail to obtain and maintain patent or other intellectual property protection for our technology, our competitors could market competing products and services utilizing our technology.

Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties domestically and internationally may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our services, technology and other intellectual property. We

cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent any misappropriation or confusion among consumers and merchant advertisers. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights from unauthorized use, our competitive position could be adversely affected.

We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents, which could be expensive and time consuming.

We may initiate patent litigation against third parties to protect or enforce our patent rights, and we may be similarly sued by others. We may also become subject to interference proceedings conducted in the patent and trademark offices of various countries to determine the priority of inventions. The defense and prosecution, if necessary, of intellectual property suits, interference proceedings and related legal and administrative proceedings is costly and may divert our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. We may not prevail in any of these suits. An adverse determination of any litigation or defense proceedings could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not being issued.

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, during the course of this kind of litigation, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments in the litigation. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have an adverse effect on the trading price of our Class B common stock and the trading price of our preferred stock.

Our quarterly results of operations might fluctuate due to seasonality, which could adversely affect our growth rate and in turn the market price of our securities.

Our quarterly results have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate in the future due to seasonal fluctuations in the level of Internet usage. As is typical in our industry, the second and third quarters of the calendar year generally experience relatively lower usage than the first and fourth quarters. It is generally understood that during the spring and summer months of the year, Internet usage is lower than during other times of the year, especially in comparison to the fourth quarter of the calendar year. The extent to which usage may decrease during these off-peak periods is difficult to predict. Prolonged or severe decreases in usage during these periods may adversely affect our growth rate and in turn the market price of our securities.

We are susceptible to general economic conditions, and a downturn in advertising and marketing spending by merchants could adversely affect our operating results.

Our operating results will be subject to fluctuations based on general economic conditions, in particular those conditions that impact merchant-consumer transactions. If there were to be a general economic downturn that affected consumer activity in particular, however slight, then we would expect that business entities, including our merchant advertisers and potential merchant advertisers, could substantially and immediately reduce their advertising and marketing budgets. We believe that during periods of lower consumer activity, merchant spending on advertising and marketing is more likely to be reduced, and more quickly, than many other types of business expenses. These factors could cause a material adverse effect on our operating results.

We depend on the growth of the Internet and Internet infrastructure for our future growth and any decrease or less than anticipated growth in Internet usage could adversely affect our business prospects.

Our future revenue and profits, if any, depend upon the continued widespread use of the Internet as an effective commercial and business medium. Factors which could reduce the widespread use of the Internet include:

•

possible disruptions or other damage to the Internet or telecommunications infrastructure;

•

failure of the individual networking infrastructures of our merchant advertisers and distribution partners to alleviate potential overloading and delayed response times;

•

a decision by merchant advertisers and consumers to spend more of their marketing dollars in offline areas;

•

increased governmental regulation and taxation; and

•

actual or perceived lack of security or privacy protection.

In particular, concerns over the security of transactions conducted on the Internet and the privacy of users, including the risk of identity theft, may inhibit the growth of the Internet and other online services, especially online commerce. In order for the online commerce market to develop successfully, we and other market participants must be able to transmit confidential information, including credit card information, securely over public networks. Any decrease or less than anticipated growth in Internet usage could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects.

We are exposed to risks associated with credit card fraud and credit payment, and we may continue to suffer losses as a result of fraudulent data or payment failure by merchant advertisers.

We have suffered losses and may continue to suffer losses as a result of payments made with fraudulent credit card data. Our failure to control fraudulent credit card transactions adequately could reduce our net revenue and gross margin and negatively impact our standing with applicable credit card authorization agencies. In addition, under limited circumstances, we extend credit to merchant advertisers who may default on their accounts payable to us or fraudulently “charge-back” amounts on their credit cards for services that have already been delivered by us.

Government regulation of the Internet may adversely affect our business and operating results.

Companies engaging in online search, commerce and related businesses face uncertainty related to future government regulation of the Internet through the application of new or existing federal, state and international laws. Due to the rapid growth and widespread use of the Internet, legislatures at the federal and state levels have enacted and are considering various laws and regulations relating to the Internet. Individual states may also enact stricter consumer legislation that affects the conduct of our business.

Furthermore, the application of existing laws and regulations to Internet companies remains somewhat unclear. For example, as a result of the actions of merchant advertisers in our network, we may be subject to the application of existing laws and regulations relating to a wide variety of issues such as privacy, gambling, sweepstakes, promotions, financial market regulation, and intellectual property ownership and infringement. In addition, existing laws that regulate or require licenses or permits for certain businesses of merchant advertisers may be unclear in their application to our business, including those related to insurance and securities brokerage, law offices and pharmacies. Our business may be negatively affected by a variety of new or existing laws and regulations, which may expose us to substantial compliance costs and liabilities and may impede the growth in use of the Internet. The application of these statutes and others to the Internet search industry is not entirely settled. Further, several existing and proposed federal laws could have an impact on our business. The existing federal laws include, among others:

•

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act and its related safe harbors are intended to reduce the liability of online service providers for listing or linking to third-party Web sites that include materials that infringe copyrights or other rights of others.

•

The Children’s Online Protection Act and the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act are intended to restrict the distribution of certain materials deemed harmful to children, and they impose additional restrictions on the ability of online services to collect user information from minors.

•

The Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act of 1998 requires online service providers to report evidence of violations of federal child pornography laws under certain circumstances.

•

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 and certain state laws are intended to impose limitations and penalties on the transmission of unsolicited commercial electronic mail via the Internet.

•

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act is intended to protect the privacy of e-mail and other electronic communications.

•

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and certain federal and state laws are intended to protect computer users from acts which may be viewed as a violation of privacy.

Courts may apply each of these laws in unintended and unexpected ways. As a company that provides services over the Internet, we may be subject to an action brought under any of these or future laws governing online services. Among the types of legislation currently being considered at the federal and state levels are consumer laws regulating the practices for software applications or downloads and the use of “cookies” and these laws may introduce requirements for user consent and other restrictions. These proposed laws are intended to target applications often referred to as spyware, invasiveware or adware, although the scope may also include some software applications currently used in the online advertising industry to serve and distribute advertisements.

Many of the services of the Internet are automated, and companies such as ours may be unknowing conduits for illegal or prohibited materials. It is not known how courts will rule in many circumstances; for example, it is possible that courts could find strict liability or impose “know your customer” standards of conduct in some circumstances. Although we may not be directly involved in any of these practices, under current and future regulation we may ultimately be held responsible for the actions of our merchant advertisers or distribution partners.

We may also be subject to costs and liabilities with respect to privacy issues. Several Internet companies have incurred costs and paid penalties for violating their privacy policies. In addition, several states have adopted legislation that requires businesses to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices to protect sensitive personal information and to provide notice to consumers of unauthorized access to computerized sensitive personal information. Further, it is anticipated that new legislation will be adopted by federal and state governments with respect to user privacy. Such legislation could negatively affect our business.

Additionally, foreign governments may pass laws which could negatively impact our business and/or may prosecute us for our products and services based upon existing laws. Any such prosecution or costs incurred in addressing foreign laws could negatively affect our business.

The restrictions imposed by, and cost of complying with, current and possible future laws and regulations related to our business could harm our business and operating results.

Future regulation of search engines may adversely affect the commercial utility of our search marketing services.

The Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, has recently reviewed the way in which search engines disclose paid placements or paid inclusion practices to Internet users. In 2002, the FTC issued guidance recommending that all search engine companies ensure that all paid search results are clearly distinguished from non-paid results, that the use of paid inclusion is clearly and conspicuously explained and disclosed and that other disclosures are made to avoid misleading users about the possible effects of paid placement or paid inclusion listings on search results. Such disclosures if ultimately mandated by the FTC or voluntarily made by us may reduce the desirability of our paid placement and paid inclusion services. We believe that some users will conclude that paid search results are not subject to the same relevancy requirements as non-paid search results, and will view paid search results less favorably. If such FTC disclosure reduces the desirability of our paid placement and paid inclusion services, and “click-throughs” of our paid search results decrease, our business could be adversely affected.

State and local governments may in the future be permitted to levy additional taxes on Internet access and electronic commerce transactions, which could result in a decrease in the level of usage of our services. In addition, we may be required to pay additional income, sales, or other taxes.

On November 19, 2004, the federal government passed legislation placing a three-year ban on state and local governments’ imposition of new taxes on Internet access or electronic commerce transactions. Unless the ban is extended, state and local governments may begin to levy additional taxes on Internet access and electronic commerce transactions upon the legislation’s expiration in November 2007. An increase in taxes may make electronic commerce transactions less attractive for merchants and businesses, which could result in a decrease in the level of usage of our services. Additionally, from time to time, various state, federal and other jurisdictional tax authorities undertake reviews of the Company and the Company’s filings. In evaluating the exposure associated with various tax filing positions, the Company on occasion accrues charges for probable exposures. We cannot predict the outcome of any of these reviews.

Risks Relating to our Common Stock and Preferred Stock

Our Class B common stock and preferred stock prices have been and are likely to continue to be highly volatile.

The trading prices of our Class B common stock and preferred stock have been and are likely to continue to be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations. Since our initial public offering, the closing sale price of our Class B common stock on the Nasdaq National Market ranged from $8.56 to $25.66 per share through December 31, 2005. Since our February 2005 follow-on offering, the closing sale price of our preferred stock on the Nasdaq National Market ranged from $164.00 to $267.00 per share through December 31, 2005. Our stock prices may fluctuate in response to a number of events and factors, which may be the result of our business strategy or events beyond our control, including:

•

developments concerning proprietary rights, including patents, by us or a competitor;

•

announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, financings, commercial relationships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

•

registration of additional shares of Class B common stock in connection with acquisitions;

•

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;

•

developments concerning our various strategic collaborations;

•

lawsuits initiated against us or lawsuits initiated by us;

•

announcements of acquisitions or technical innovations;

•

potential loss or reduced contributions from distribution partners or merchant advertisers;

•

changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by analysts;

•

changes in the market valuations of similar companies;

•

changes in our industry and the overall economic environment;

•

volume of shares of Class B common stock available for public sale, including on conversion of Class A common stock and preferred stock or upon exercise of stock options;

•

sales of stock by us or by our stockholders, including sales by certain of our executive officers and directors pursuant to written pre-determined selling plans under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

•

short sales, hedging and other derivative transactions on shares of our Class B common stock and preferred stock.

In addition, the stock market in general, and the Nasdaq National Market and the market for online commerce companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the listed companies. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our Class B common stock and preferred stock, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. Litigation against us, whether or not judgment is entered against us, could result in substantial costs and potentially economic loss, and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources, any of which could seriously harm our financial condition. Additionally, there can be no assurance that an active trading market of our Class B common stock and preferred stock will be sustained.

Because our shares of the preferred stock are convertible into shares of Class B common stock, volatility or depressed prices for our Class B common stock could have a similar effect on the value of the preferred stock. Holders who receive Class B common stock upon conversion also will be subject to the risk of volatility and depressed prices of our Class B common stock.

Our founding executive officers control the outcome of stockholder voting, and there may be an adverse effect on the price of our Class B common stock due to the disparate voting rights of our Class A common stock and our Class B common stock.

As of December 31, 2005, Russell C. Horowitz, Ethan A. Caldwell, Peter Christothoulou and John Keister, our founding executive officers, beneficially owned 96% of the outstanding shares of our Class A common stock, which shares represented 88% of the combined voting power of all outstanding shares of our capital stock. These founding executive officers together control 89% of the combined voting power of all outstanding shares of our capital stock excluding shares of Class B common stock issuable upon conversion of the preferred stock. The holders of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock have identical rights except that the holders of our Class B common stock are entitled to one vote per share, while holders of our Class A common stock are entitled to twenty-five votes per share on all matters to be voted on by stockholders. This concentration of control could be disadvantageous to our other stockholders with interests different from those of these founding executive officers. This difference in the voting rights of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock could adversely affect the price of our Class B common stock to the extent that investors or any potential future purchaser of our shares of Class B common stock give greater value to the superior voting rights of our Class A common stock.

Further, as long as these founding executive officers have a controlling interest, they will continue to be able to elect all or a majority of our board of directors and generally be able to determine the outcome of all corporate actions requiring stockholder approval. As a result, these founding executive officers will be in a position to continue to control all fundamental matters affecting our company, including any merger involving, sale of substantially all of the assets of, or change in control of, our company. The ability of these founding executive officers to control our company may result in our Class B common stock and preferred stock trading at a price lower than the price at which such stock would trade if these founding executive officers did not have a controlling interest in us. This control may deter or prevent a third party from acquiring us which could adversely affect the market price of our Class B common stock and preferred stock.

Anti-takeover provisions may limit the ability of another party to acquire us, which could cause our stock price to decline.

Our certificate of incorporation, as amended, our by-laws and Delaware law contain provisions that could discourage, delay or prevent a third party from acquiring us, even if doing so may be beneficial to our stockholders. In addition, these provisions could limit the price investors would be willing to pay in the future for shares of our Class B common stock and preferred stock. The following are examples of such provisions in our certificate of incorporation, as amended, or our by-laws:

•

the authorized number of our directors can be changed only by a resolution of our board of directors;

•

advance notice is required for proposals that can be acted upon at stockholder meetings;

•

there are limitations on who may call stockholder meetings; and

•

our board of directors is authorized, without prior stockholder approval, to create and issue “blank check” preferred stock.

We are also subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which provides, subject to enumerated exceptions, that if a person acquires 15% or more of our voting stock, the person is an “interested stockholder” and may not engage in “business combinations” with us for a period of three years from the time the person acquired 15% or more of our voting stock. The application of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our company.

Conversion of our convertible preferred stock has and will dilute the interests of our existing Class B common stockholders.

The conversion of some or all of the preferred stock has and will dilute the interests of our existing Class B common stockholders. Sales in the public market of shares of Class B common stock issued upon conversion may apply downward pressure on the prevailing market price. In addition, the mere issuance of the preferred stock represents a future issuance, and perhaps a future sale, of our Class B common stock to be acquired upon conversion, which could depress trading prices for our Class B common stock.

We anticipate that we will retain our future earnings except for the payment of dividends on the preferred stock, and as a result holders of Class B common stock are not likely to receive dividends.

We anticipate that we will retain all of our future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business and to make periodic installments of the dividend on the preferred stock. Therefore, holders of Class B common stock are not likely to receive dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, dividends, if and when paid, may be subject to income tax withholding.

We may not be able to pay dividends on the preferred stock, which could impair its value.

Under Delaware law, dividends to stockholders may be made only from the surplus of a company, or, in certain situations, from the net profits for the current fiscal year or the fiscal year before which the dividend is declared. Our ability to pay dividends in the future will depend on our financial results, liquidity and financial condition. We can not be sure that we will have the surplus or profits to make periodic dividend payments, and we can not be sure that we will be able to pay the periodic installments of the dividend on the preferred stock.

The market price of the preferred stock may decline.

An active trading market for the preferred stock has not fully developed and as a result, the market price and liquidity of the preferred stock will be adversely affected. Even if an active trading market for the preferred stock were to develop, the preferred stock could trade for less than the public offering price, depending on many factors, including prevailing interest rates, our operating results and the markets for similar securities, and such active trading market could cease to continue at any time. In addition, if the preferred stock is exchanged for debentures, we are not obligated to list the debentures and cannot assure you that a market for the debentures will develop.

There may be tax consequences to the holders if we exchange preferred stock for debentures.

An exchange of the preferred stock for debentures will be a taxable event for federal income tax purposes which may result in tax liability to the holders without any corresponding receipt of cash by the holder. Such an exchange may be taxable as a dividend distribution to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, and may be subject to withholding tax if the exchanging stockholder is a Non-U.S. Holder.

Our current and future payment obligations or indebtedness will have priority over a preferred stock liquidation preference and accrued dividend payment obligation in the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up.

The terms of the preferred stock do not contain any financial or operating covenants that would prohibit or limit us or our subsidiaries from incurring indebtedness or other liabilities, pledging assets to secure such indebtedness and liabilities, paying dividends, or issuing securities or repurchasing securities issued by us or any of our subsidiaries. The incurrence of indebtedness by us or our subsidiaries and, in particular, the granting of a security interest to secure the indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to pay accrued dividends under the terms of the preferred stock.

If we incur indebtedness, the holders of that debt will have prior rights with respect to any proceeds distributed in connection with any insolvency, liquidation, reorganization, dissolution or other winding-up of us. This may have the effect of reducing the amount of proceeds in connection with any insolvency, liquidation, reorganization or other winding-up of us paid to holders of the preferred stock.

The rights of holders of the Class B common stock will be junior to the rights of holders of the preferred stock in the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up.

The terms of the preferred stock provide that holders will receive a preference over the other equity securities of the company upon its liquidation, dissolution or winding-up. This liquidation preference is equal to $250 per share of preferred stock plus all accrued and unpaid dividends through the distribution date. These rights of payment are senior to the liquidation rights of the holders of the Class B common stock. This may have the effect of reducing the amount of proceeds in connection with any insolvency, liquidation, reorganization or other winding-up of us paid to holders of the Class B common stock.

ITEM 7.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


		Page
Marchex, Inc.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		62

Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2005		63

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005		64

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005		65

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005		66

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		67

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Marchex, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Marchex, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and the related consolidated statement of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Marchex, Inc. and subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2005 and results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington

March 29, 2006

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheet


	December 31, 2005
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	63,090,941
Accounts receivable, net		14,401,814
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,818,211
Refundable taxes		3,835,542
Deferred income tax assets		428,855

Total current assets		83,575,363
Property and equipment, net		3,402,262
Deferred tax assets		—
Intangible and other assets, net		15,447,504
Goodwill		180,637,076
Intangible assets from acquisitions, net		51,346,944

Total assets	$	334,409,149

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	9,258,423
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		1,755,970
Deferred revenue		2,291,374

Total current liabilities		13,305,767
Deferred income tax liabilities		397,481
Other non-current liabilities		92,309

Total liabilities		13,795,557

Commitments, contingencies, and subsequent events

Stockholders’ equity:
Convertible preferred stock, $.01 par value: 1,000,000 shares authorized; 225,485 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005
Aggregate liquidation preference - $56,720,830		54,121,678
Common stock, $.01 par value. Authorized 137,500,000 shares;
Class A: 12,500,000 shares authorized; 11,928,216 issued and 11,665,716 shares outstanding at December 31, 2005		119,282
Class B: 125,000,000 shares authorized; 25,617,249 issued and 25,483,939 outstanding at December 31, 2005, including 293,171 of restricted stock at December 31, 2005		254,839
Additional paid-in capital		271,949,963
Deferred stock-based compensation		(3,042,016	)
Accumulated deficit		(2,790,154	)

Total stockholders’ equity		320,613,592

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	334,409,149

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations


	Year ended December 31, 2004			Year ended December 31, 2005
Revenue	$	43,804,272		$	94,995,847

Expenses:
Service costs ⁽¹⁾		27,449,938			48,897,326
Sales and marketing ⁽¹⁾		4,414,043			10,018,857
Product development ⁽¹⁾		2,291,430			4,465,763
General and administrative ⁽¹⁾		4,111,544			6,364,573
Acquisition-related retention consideration ⁽²⁾		499,080			—
Facility relocation		199,960			—
Stock-based compensation ⁽³⁾		890,520			1,971,807
Amortization of intangible assets from acquisitions ⁽⁴⁾		4,965,503			18,429,008

Total operating expenses		44,822,018			90,147,334
Gain on sales of intangible assets, net		—			997

Income (loss) from operations		(1,017,746	)		4,849,510
Other income (expense):
Interest income		265,354			1,982,222
Interest expense		(5,654	)		(7,463	)
Adjustment to fair value of redemption obligation		55,250			—
Other		3,644			4,000

Total other income		318,594			1,978,759

Income (loss) before provision for income taxes		(699,152	)		6,828,269
Income tax expense		33,941			2,920,463

Net income (loss)		(733,093	)		3,907,806
Convertible preferred stock dividends		—			2,405,780
Accretion to redemption value of redeemable convertible preferred stock		420,430			—

Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders	$	(1,153,523	)	$	1,502,026

Basic net income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders	$	(0.05	)	$	0.04
Diluted net income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders	$	(0.05	)	$	0.04
Shares used to calculate basic net income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders		22,087,503			34,564,790
Shares used to calculate diluted net income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders		22,087,503			36,907,633
⁽¹⁾ Excludes acquisition-related retention consideration, stock-based compensation and amortization of intangible assets from acquisitions
⁽²⁾Components of acquisition-related retention consideration:
Service costs	$	116,585		$	—
Sales and marketing		204,528			—
Product development		135,947			—
General and administrative		42,020			—
⁽³⁾ Components of stock-based compensation:
Service costs	$	10,800		$	4,500
Sales and marketing		155,734			1,108,180
Product development		59,883			28,795
General and administrative		664,103			830,332
⁽⁴⁾Components of amortization of intangible assets from acquisitions:
Service costs	$	3,520,878		$	13,783,598
Sales and marketing		701,077			1,295,000
General and administrative		743,548			3,350,410

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity


	Convertible preferred stock					Class A common stock					Class B common stock					Additional paid-in capital			Deferred stock-based compensation			Accumulated deficit			Total stockholders’ equity
	Shares		Amount			Shares		Amount			Shares		Amount			Additional paid-in capital			Deferred stock-based compensation			Accumulated deficit			Total stockholders’ equity
Balances at December 31, 2003	—		$	—		11,987,500		$	122,500		1,567,500		$	15,675		$	6,716,734		$	(1,532,340	)	$	(3,488,237	)	$	1,834,332
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	—			—		—			—		159,622			1,596			175,090			—			—			176,686
Income tax benefits of option exercises	—			—		—			—		—			—			444,161			—			—			444,161
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan	—			—		—			—		26,735			267			242,153			—			—			242,420
Issuance of common stock in initial public offering, net of issuance costs	—			—		—			—		4,600,000			46,000			27,190,288			—			—			27,236,288
Conversion of Series A redeemable preferred stock to common stock in connection with initial public offering	—			—		—			—		6,724,063			67,241			21,793,591			—			—			21,860,832
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition	—			—		—			—		433,541			4,336			4,135,980			—			—			4,140,316
Stock compensation from options	—			—		—			—		—			—			(120,000	)		1,010,520			—			890,520
Net loss	—			—		—			—		—			—			—			—			(733,093	)		(733,093	)
Accretion to redemption value of redeemable convertible preferred stock	—			—		—			—		—			—			—			—			(420,430	)		(420,430	)

Balances at December 31, 2004	—		$	—		11,987,500		$	122,500		13,511,461		$	135,115		$	60,577,997		$	(521,820	)	$	(4,641,760	)	$	55,672,032

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	—			—		—			—		618,336			6,183			1,973,346			—			—			1,979,529
Income tax benefits of option exercises	—			—		—			—		—			—			3,197,684			—			—			3,197,684
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan	—			—		—			—		17,280			173			239,983			—			—			240,156
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants	—			—		—			—		62,551			625			66,975			—			—			67,600
Issuance of convertible preferred stock and common stock in public offering, net of issuance costs	230,000			55,205,369		—			—		9,200,000			92,000			174,041,427			—			—			229,338,796
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisitions	—			—		—			—		1,450,453			14,504			26,281,224			—			—			26,295,728
Issuance of restricted common stock for services at time of acquisitions	—			—		—			—		389,313			3,893			6,582,567			(6,586,460	)		—			—
Conversion of convertible preferred stock to Class B common stock	(4,515	)		(1,083,691	)	—			—		46,071			461			1,083,217			—			—			(13	)
Conversion of Class A common stock to Class B common stock	—			—		(321,784	)		(3,218	)	321,784			3,218			—			—			—			—
Purchase of unvested restricted stock	—			—		—			—		(133,310	)		(1,333	)		—			—			—			(1,333	)
Stock compensation from options and restricted stock, net	—			—		—			—		—			—			(2,094,457	)		4,066,264			—			1,971,807
Net income	—			—		—			—		—			—			—			—			3,907,806			3,907,806
Convertible preferred stock dividends	—			—		—			—		—			—			—			—			(2,056,200	)		(2,056,200	)

Balances at December 31, 2005	225,485		$	54,121,678		11,665,716		$	119,282		25,483,939		$	254,839		$	271,949,963		$	(3,042,016	)	$	(2,790,154	)	$	320,613,592

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


	Year ended December 31, 2004			Year ended December 31, 2005
Net income (loss)	$	(733,093	)	$	3,907,806
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization and depreciation		5,659,300			22,713,193
Adjustment to fair value of redemption obligation		(55,250	)		—
Facility relocation costs (recoveries)		118,565			(58,406	)
Gain on sales of fixed assets		—			(4,000	)
Gain on sales of intangible assets		—			(997	)
Allowance for doubtful accounts and merchant advertiser credits		1,297,981			1,638,136
Stock-based compensation		890,520			1,971,807
Deferred income taxes		(1,831,932	)		(2,690,464	)
Income tax benefit related to stock options		444,161			3,197,684
Change in certain assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Trade accounts receivable, net		(4,464,198	)		(10,390,463	)
Refundable taxes		(611,307	)		(2,951,282	)
Prepaid expenses, other current assets, and restricted cash		(370,708	)		(1,725,143	)
Accounts payable		2,847,069			1,562,057
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		(173,920	)		738,328
Deferred revenue		495,609			6,536
Acquisition-related retention consideration in earn-out liability		218,500			(501,769	)
Other non current liabilities		(2,274	)		43,796

Net cash provided by operating activities		3,729,023			17,456,819
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,005,848	)		(2,503,717	)
Cash paid for acquisitions and earn-outs, net of cash acquired		(10,790,150	)		(190,130,955	)
Proceeds from sales of equipment		3,710			5,668
Proceeds from sales of intangible assets		—			942,309
Increase in other non current assets		(727,029	)		(17,213,949	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(12,519,317	)		(208,900,644	)
Capital lease obligation principal paid		(4,383	)		(8,494	)
Offering costs paid		(1,132,278	)		(907,058	)
Preferred stock dividends		—			(2,056,200	)
Proceeds from public offerings, net of underwriter discounts		28,405,100			230,287,500
Proceeds from exercises of warrants		—			67,600
Proceeds from exercises of stock options		190,758			1,979,529
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan		245,044			238,823

Net cash provided by financing activities		27,704,241			229,601,700

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		18,913,947			38,157,875
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		6,019,119			24,933,066

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	24,933,066		$	63,090,941

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for income taxes, net of refunds		2,033,019			5,240,569
Cash paid during the period for interest		6,060			7,464
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of stock in connection with acquisitions		4,140,316			26,295,728
Cashless exercise of warrants		—			891,475
Accretion to redemption value of redeemable convertible preferred stock		420,430			—
Acquisition and offering costs recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses		383,595			56,305
Additional acquisition earn-out consideration included in earn-out liability		5,735,809			—
Property and equipment acquired with capital lease obligation		53,562			12,790
Property and equipment acquired in accounts payable and accrued expenses		124,639			336,323

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(1) Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Practices

(a) Description of Business and Basis of Presentation

Marchex, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on January 17, 2003. The Company offers a platform of integrated performance-based advertising and search marketing services which enables merchants to market and sell their products across multiple distribution channels, including search engines, product shopping engines, directories and selected Web sites. The Company also offers super-aggregators and publishers outsourced search marketing platforms, which is a combination of several of the Company’s advertiser technology services, to allow them to sell search marketing packages directly sell to their customers.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Marchex and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Acquisitions are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of the date of acquisition. The Company’s purchase accounting resulted in all assets and liabilities of acquired businesses being recorded at their estimated fair values on the acquisition dates. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2004 consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2005 presentation.

On February 28, 2003, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of eFamily.com, Inc. and ah-ha.com, Inc., its wholly-owned operating subsidiary, based in Provo, Utah. ah-ha.com, Inc. was renamed Enhance Interactive, Inc. in December 2003. Enhance Interactive provides performance-based advertising services to merchant advertisers, including pay-per-click listings. The aggregate cash consideration, including acquisition costs to acquire Enhance Interactive was approximately $15.1 million. The purchase price excludes earnings-based contingent payments that depended upon the achievement of minimum income before taxes, excluding stock-based compensation and amortization of intangible assets relating to the acquisition (“earnings before taxes”) thresholds in calendar years 2003 and 2004 of the acquired business. As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, the thresholds had been achieved for the calendar years 2003 and 2004 and the contingent earn-out consideration payments have been accounted for as additional goodwill, as all original shareholders of Enhance Interactive received the consideration in proportion to their former share interests and the amounts reflect additional purchase price. Additional goodwill of $3.2 million and $5.7 million was recorded for the calendar years 2003 and 2004, respectively, for the earn-out consideration. Subsequent to December 31, 2004, no additional obligations exist related to the shareholder earn-out consideration.

In addition, if the minimum thresholds above were achieved, a payment of 5.56% of the acquired businesses’ earnings before taxes for calendar years 2003 and 2004, up to an aggregate maximum of $1,000,000, was to be paid to certain current employees of the acquired business (“acquisition-related retention consideration”). As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, the thresholds had been achieved for the calendars years 2003 and 2004, and $283,000 and $499,000, respectively, was recorded for the acquisition-related retention consideration including employer payroll-related taxes. These amounts have been accounted for as compensation expense. Subsequent to December 31, 2004, no additional obligations exist related to the acquisition-related retention consideration.

On October 24, 2003, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Sitewise Marketing, Inc. (d.b.a TrafficLeader) (“TrafficLeader”). In November, 2003, Sitewise Marketing, Inc., based in Eugene, Oregon, was renamed TrafficLeader, Inc. TrafficLeader provides performance-based advertising and search marketing services to merchant advertisers, including feed management, advertising campaign management, conversion tracking and analysis, and search engine optimization. The purchase consideration consisted of:

•

$3.6 million in cash and acquisition costs; plus

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

•

425,000 shares of Class B common stock, which were subject to a redemption right; plus

•

137,500 shares of restricted Class B common stock that vest over a period of 3 years from the closing date.

The above summary of the costs of acquisition excludes performance-based contingent payments that depended on TrafficLeader’s achievement of revenue thresholds. As of December 31, 2004, the performance-based conditions had not been achieved therefore no further contingent payment obligation remains.

On July 27, 2004, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of goClick.com, Inc. (“goClick”), a Norwalk, Connecticut-based company. goClick provides marketing technology and services for small merchants. The purchase consideration consisted of:

•

$7.5 million in net cash and acquisition costs; plus

•

433,541 shares of Class B common stock.

The shares of Class B common stock were valued (for accounting purposes) for an aggregate amount of approximately $4.14 million.

On February 14, 2005, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Name Development Ltd. (“Name Development”) for the following consideration:

•

$155.6 million in cash and estimated acquisition costs; plus

•

419,659 shares of Class B common stock.

The shares of Class B common stock were valued (for accounting purposes) at an aggregate amount of approximately $8.8 million.

The Company acquired certain assets of Name Development, including its portfolio of Internet domains and Web sites, revenue-generating contracts, technology and systems, for the operation of the Name Development direct navigation business. The Company did not assume any other obligations with respect to Name Development as part of this asset acquisition.

On April 26, 2005, the Company acquired certain assets of Pike Street Industries, Inc. (“Pike Street”), an online yellow pages and lead generation provider for local merchants, for the following consideration:

•

$12.8 million in cash and estimated acquisition costs; plus

•

242,748 shares of Class B common stock; plus

•

212,404 shares of restricted Class B common stock that vest over a period of 3 years from the closing date.

The shares of Class B common stock, excluding the shares of restricted Class B common stock, were valued (for accounting purposes) at an aggregate amount of approximately $4.1 million.

The shares of restricted Class B common stock were valued at $16.85 per share (the last reported sales price on the closing date) at an aggregate amount of approximately $3.6 million. The shares of restricted Class B common stock were issued to the former stockholders of Pike Street who became employees of the Company.

The Company did not assume any other obligations with respect to Pike Street as part of the asset acquisition.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

On July 27, 2005, the Company acquired IndustryBrains, Inc. (“IndustryBrains”), a company focused on monetizing Web sites through contextual advertising solutions, for the following consideration:

•

$16.1 million in net cash and estimated acquisition costs; plus

•

788,046 shares of Class B common stock; plus

•

176,909 shares of restricted Class B common stock that vest over a period of two and one-half years from the closing date.

The shares of Class B common stock, excluding the shares of restricted Class B common stock, were valued (for accounting purposes) at an aggregate amount of approximately $13.4 million.

(b) Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase and proceeds in-transit from credit and debit card transactions with settlement terms of less than five days to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents totaled approximately $62.6 million at December 31, 2005. Cash equivalents consist primarily of money market funds and include credit and debit card in-transit amounts of approximately $523,000 at December 31, 2005.

(c) Restricted Cash

As of December 31, 2005, the Company had $800,000 in restricted cash on reserve at a credit card authorization agency. The restricted cash is included in other non-current assets.

(d) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company had the following financial instruments as of December 31, 2005: cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, refundable taxes, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, refundable taxes, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates their fair value based on the liquidity of these financial instruments or based on their short-term nature.

The terms of the Company’s preferred stock offering in February 2005 included an exchange feature in which at the option of the Company, the preferred stock is exchangeable, in whole but not in part, on any dividend payment date beginning on February 15, 2006 for the Company’s 4.75% convertible subordinated debentures. This feature is considered to be an embedded derivative and will be reflected as an asset, if there is any value ascribed to it, and is subject to variable accounting. The right will be marked to market at each reporting date until such time as the right is exercised or expires. Based on a variety of factors including the assessed probability of exercise, no value has been ascribed to this right at December 31, 2005. See Note 6(c) – “Convertible Preferred Stock”.

(e) Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Accounts receivable balances are presented net of allowance for doubtful accounts and allowance for merchant advertiser credits.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on analysis of historical bad debts, advertiser concentrations, advertiser credit-worthiness and current economic trends. Past due balances over 90 days and specific other balances are reviewed individually for collectibility. The Company reviews the allowance for collectibility quarterly. Account balances are written off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.

The allowance for doubtful account activity for the periods indicated is as follows:


	Balance at beginning of period		Business combinations		Charged to costs and expenses		Write-offs, net of recoveries		Balance at end of period
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
December 31, 2004	$	91,280	$	—	$	420,929	$	222,295	$	289,914
December 31, 2005		289,914		16,000		110,381		78,231		338,064

There was one new merchant advertiser in 2005 who represented approximately 23% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005 and approximately 37% of the outstanding accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2005. There was one other merchant advertiser representing 16% of the outstanding accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2005.

Allowance for Merchant Advertiser Credits

The allowance for merchant advertiser credits is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of expected future reductions in a merchant advertiser’s payment obligations related to delivered services. The Company determines the allowance for merchant advertiser credits and adjustments based on analysis of historical credits.

The allowance for merchant advertiser credits activity for the periods indicated is as follows:


	Balance at beginning of period		Business combinations		Additions charged against revenue		Credits processed		Balance at end of period
Allowance for merchant advertiser credits:
December 31, 2004	$	67,846	$	30,278	$	877,052	$	726,836	$	248,340
December 31, 2005		248,340		12,000		1,527,755		1,514,424		273,671

Incentive Program Allowances

Under the merchant advertiser incentive program, the Company grants merchant advertisers with account credits depending upon the individual amounts or prepayments made. The incentive program allowance is determined based upon historical rate of incentives earned and used by merchant advertisers compared to the related revenues recognized by the Company. The costs related to the incentives are comprised primarily of user acquisition costs and other costs as denoted in note (1) (i). These costs are expensed as incurred in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 01-09, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendor’s Products).

Revenue is recognized based upon the total estimated click-throughs to be delivered, which includes incentive credits to be provided to merchant advertisers.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The merchant advertiser credit and incentive program allowance balances are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and amounted to $58,000 as of December 31, 2005.

(f) Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation on computers and other related equipment, purchased and internally developed software, and furniture and fixtures is calculated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally averaging three years. Leasehold improvements are amortized straight-line over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from three to five years.

(g) Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations accounted for under the purchase method.

The Company applies the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying value of the goodwill exceeds the assets fair value. SFAS 142 also requires that intangible assets with definite useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144).

(h) Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment in accordance with SFAS 144 whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds fair value. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented on the balance sheet and reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated.

(i) Revenue Recognition

The Company’s primary sources of revenue are performance-based advertising services, which include pay-per-click services, feed management services and cost-per-action services. Revenue from pay-per-click services and feed management services are generated upon the delivery of qualified and reported click-throughs, which occur when an online user clicks on merchant advertiser listings or advertising service provider listings after it has been placed by the Company or by the Company’s distribution partners into search engines, directories, destination sites, product shopping engines, Internet domains or Web sites, and other targeted Web-based content. Revenue from cost-per-action services are generated when an online user is redirected from the Company web sites to a merchant advertiser web site and completes the specified action.

The secondary sources of revenue are bid management services, natural search engine optimization, and outsourced search marketing platform services, as well as banner advertising, account set-up fees and other

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

inclusion fees. These secondary sources of revenue together constituted less than 6% of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005. The Company has no barter transactions.

The Company follows Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104 Revenue Recognition (SAB 104). SAB 104 summarizes certain of the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) staff’s views on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to revenue recognition. The Company generally recognizes revenue upon completion of our performance obligation, provided evidence of an arrangement exits, the arrangement fee is fixed and determinable and collection is reasonably assured.

Merchant advertisers pay the Company additional fees for services such as advertising campaign management services and search optimization services. Merchant advertisers generally pay on a click-through basis, although in certain cases the Company receives a fixed fee for delivery of these services. Revenue is recognized on a click-through basis or in the month the service is provided.

Banner advertising revenue may be based on a fixed fee per click-through and is generated and recognized on click-through activity. In other cases, banner payment terms are volume-based with revenue recognized when impressions are delivered.

Non-refundable account set-up fees paid by merchant advertisers are recognized ratably over the longer term of the contract or the average expected merchant advertiser relationship period, which generally ranges between one and two years.

Other inclusion fees are generally associated with monthly or annual subscription-based services where a merchant advertiser pays a fixed amount to be included in the Company’s or distribution partners’ index of listings. Revenues from these subscription arrangements are recognized ratably over the service period.

The Company generates revenue from super-aggregator partners and publishers utilizing our web-based technologies. The Company is paid a management or agency fee based on the total amount of the purchase made by the merchant advertiser.

The Company enters into agreements with various distribution partners to provide distribution for the URL strings and advertisement listings of our merchant advertisers. The Company generally pays distribution partners based on a percentage of revenue or a fixed amount per click-through on these listings. The Company acts as the primary obligor with the merchant advertiser for revenue click-through transactions and is responsible for the fulfillment of services. In accordance with EITF Issue No. 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an Agent, the revenue derived from advertisers is reported gross based upon the amounts received from the merchant advertiser. The Company also recognizes revenue for certain agency contracts with merchant advertisers under the net revenue recognition method. Under these specific agreements, the Company purchases listings on behalf of merchant advertisers from search engines, directories and other Web-based content providers. The Company is paid an agency fee based on the total amount of the purchases made on behalf of these merchant advertisers. Under these agreements, the merchant advertisers are primarily responsible for choosing the publisher and determining pricing, and the Company, in certain instances, is only financially liable to the publisher for the amount collected from merchant advertisers. This creates a sequential liability for media purchases made on behalf of merchant advertisers. The Company recognizes revenue from certain web publisher agreements utilizing the Company’s web-based technologies under the net revenue recognition method. The web publishers engage the merchant advertisers and are the primary obligor, and the Company, in certain instances, is only financially liable to the publishers in the Company’s capacity as a collection agency for the amount collected from the merchant advertisers.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(j) Service Costs

The largest component of the Company’s service costs consist of user acquisition costs that relate primarily to payments made to distribution partners for access to their online user traffic. The Company enters into agreements of varying durations with distribution partners that integrate the Company’s services into their Web sites and indexes. The primary economic structure of the distribution partner agreements is a variable payment based on a specified percentage of revenue. These variable payments are often subject to minimum payment amounts per click-through. Other economic structures that to a lesser degree exist include: 1) fixed payments, based on a guaranteed minimum amount of usage delivered, 2) variable payments based on a specified metric, such as number of paid click-throughs, and 3) a combination arrangement with both fixed and variable amounts.

The Company expenses user acquisition costs based on whether the agreement provides for fixed or variable payments. Agreements with fixed payments are generally expensed as the greater of the following:

•

pro-rata over the term the fixed payment covers; or

•

usage delivered to date divided by the guaranteed minimum amount of usage delivered.

Agreements with variable payments based on a percentage of revenue, number of paid click-throughs or other metrics are expensed as incurred based on the volume of the underlying activity or revenue multiplied by the agreed-upon price or rate.

Service costs also include network operations and customer service costs that consist primarily of costs associated with providing performance-based advertising and search marketing services, maintaining the Company’s Web site, credit card processing fees, network costs and fees paid to outside service providers that provide the Company’s paid listings and customer services. Customer service and other costs associated with serving the Company’s search results and maintaining the Company’s Web site include depreciation of Web site and network equipment, co-location charges of the Company’s Web site equipment, bandwidth, software license fees, salaries of related personnel, stock-based compensation and amortization of intangible assets. Other service costs include license fees, the amortization of the purchase cost of domain names, the costs incurred for the renewal of the domain name registration and impairment charges for the domain name intangible assets.

(k) Advertising Expenses

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and include Internet-based advertising, sponsorships, and trade shows. Such costs are included in sales and marketing. Internet-based advertising is concentrated primarily with three providers. The amounts were approximately $309,000 and $4.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively.

(l) Other Intangible Assets and Product Development

The Company capitalizes costs incurred to acquire domain names or URLs, which include the initial registration fees, and amortizes the costs over the expected useful life of the domain names on a straight-line basis. The expected useful lives range from 12 to 84 months. In order to maintain the rights to each domain name acquired, the Company pays periodic registration fees, which generally cover a minimum period of 12 months. The Company records registration renewal fees of domain name intangible assets as a prepaid expense and amortizes the cost over the renewal period.

Product development costs consist primarily of expenses incurred by the Company in the research and development, creation, and enhancement of the Company’s Internet sites and services. Research and

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

development expenses are expensed as incurred and include compensation and related expenses, costs of computer hardware and software, and costs incurred in developing features and functionality of the services. For the periods presented, substantially all of the product development expenses are research and development.

Product development costs are expensed as incurred or capitalized into property and equipment in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ (AICPA) Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use (SOP 98-1). SOP 98-1 requires that cost incurred in the preliminary project and post-implementation stages of an internal use software project be expensed as incurred and that certain costs incurred in the application development stage of a project be capitalized.

(m) Income Taxes

The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not be realized.

(n) Stock Option Plan

The Company applies the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25 issued in March 2000, to account for its employee stock options and restricted stock grants. Under this method, employee compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. SFAS No. 123 (SFAS 123), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. As allowed by SFAS 123, the Company has elected to apply the intrinsic value-based method of accounting described above for options granted to employees, and has adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123.

The Company recognizes compensation expense over the vesting period utilizing the accelerated methodology described in FASB Interpretation No. 28, Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) if the fair-value-based method had been applied to all outstanding awards in each period.


	Year ended December 31, 2004			Year ended December 31, 2005
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders:
As reported	$	(1,153,523	)	$	1,502,026
Add: stock based employee compensation expense included in reported net income (loss), net of related tax effect		768,766			1,588,613
Deduct: stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair-value-based method for all awards, net of related tax effect		(4,510,223	)		(10,036,580	)

Pro forma net loss applicable to common stockholders	$	(4,894,980	)	$	(6,945,941	)

Net income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders:
As reported (basic and diluted)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.04
Pro forma (basic and diluted)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.20	)

See note 6(d) for details of the assumptions used to arrive at the fair value of each option grant.

See Note 1(s), “Recently Issued Accounting Standards”, regarding the impact of the adoption of the FASB No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.”

The Company accounts for non-employee stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123 and EITF No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.

(o) Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The Company has used estimates related to several financial statement amounts, including revenues, allowance for doubtful accounts, allowance for merchant advertiser credits and the incentive program allowance, accrued facility relocation, useful lives for property and equipment, intangible assets, the fair value of a redemption right obligation, the fair-value of the Company’s common stock and stock option awards, the fair value of the Company’s convertible preferred stock and a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

In certain cases, the Company records revenue based on available and reported preliminary information from third parties. Collection on the related receivables may vary from reported information based upon third party refinement of the estimated and reported amounts owing that occurs subsequent to period ends.

(p) Concentrations

The Company maintains substantially all of their cash and cash equivalents with one financial institution.

A substantial majority of the Company’s revenue earned from merchant advertisers is generated through arrangements with distribution partners. The Company may not be successful in renewing any of these

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

agreements, or if they are renewed, they may not be on terms as favorable as current agreements. The Company may not be successful in entering into agreements with new distribution partners on commercially acceptable terms. In addition, several of these distribution partners may be considered potential competitors.

The percentage of revenue earned from merchant advertisers supplied by distribution partners representing more than 10% of consolidated revenue is as follows:

Distribution Partner A was a new merchant advertiser in 2005 who represented approximately 23% of revenue for the period ended December 31, 2005 and approximately 37% of the outstanding accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2005.

(q) Segment Reporting and Geographic Information

Operating segments are revenue-producing components of the enterprise for which separate financial information is produced internally for the Company’s management. For all periods presented the Company operated as a single segment. The Company operates in a single operating segment principally in domestic markets providing Internet merchant transaction services to enterprises.

Revenues from merchant advertisers by geographical areas are tracked on the basis of the location of the merchant advertiser. The vast majority of the Company’s revenue and accounts receivable are derived from domestic sales to advertisers engaged in various activities involving the Internet.

Revenues by geographic region are as follows (in percentages):


	Year ended		Year ended
	December 31,		December 31,
	2004		2005
United States	89	%	90	%
Canada	4	%	3	%
Other countries	7	%	7	%

	100	%	100	%

(r) Net Income (Loss) Per Share

The Company’s basic and diluted net income (loss) per share is presented for years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005. Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the year. Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders consists of net income (loss) as adjusted for the impact in 2004 of accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to its redemption value and in 2005 for convertible preferred stock dividends. Diluted net income (loss) per share excludes the convertible preferred stock dividends and includes the shares that the preferred stock is convertible into if the result is dilutive. As the Company had a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2004, basic and diluted net loss per share are the same.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The following table reconciles the Company’s reported net income (loss) to net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders used to compute basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005:


	Year ended December 31, 2004			Year ended December 31, 2005
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(733,093	)	$	3,907,806
Convertible preferred stock dividends		—			2,405,780
Accretion to redemption value of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock		420,430			—

Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders	$	(1,153,523	)	$	1,502,026

Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding excluding unvested common shares subject to repurchase or cancellation		22,087,503			34,564,790

Weighted average number of shares outstanding used to calculate basic net income (loss) per share		22,087,503			34,564,790

Effect of dilutive securities:
Weighted average stock options and warrants and common shares subject to repurchase or cancellation		—			2,342,843

Weighted average number of shares outstanding used to calculate diluted net income (loss) per share		22,087,503			36,907,633

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders	$	(0.05	)	$	0.04

The computation of diluted net income (loss) per share excludes the following because their effect would be anti-dilutive:

•

For the year ended December 31, 2004, 6,724,063 shares issuable upon conversion of the Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock. On April 5, 2004, 6,724,063 shares of the Company’s Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock automatically converted into 6,724,063 shares of Class B common stock in connection with the Company’s initial public offering;

•

For the year ended December 31, 2005, 2,300,867 shares issuable upon conversion of the 4.75% convertible preferred stock issued in connection with the February 2005 follow-on public offering;

•

For the year ended December 31, 2004, outstanding options to acquire 4,409,570 shares of Class B common stock with a weighted average exercise price of $6.06 per share and for the year ended December 31, 2005, outstanding options to acquire 429,800 shares of Class B common stock with a weighted average exercise price of $19.51 per share;

•

For the year ended December 31, 2004, warrants to acquire 120,000 shares of Class B common stock at an exercise price equal to $8.45 per share; and

•

For the year ended December 31, 2004, 72,228 unvested Class B restricted common shares, related to the 108,432 Class B restricted common shares issued in connection with the October 2003 acquisition of TrafficLeader. These shares were for future services that vest over 3 years. Additionally, these unvested shares were excluded from the computation of basic net loss per share.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(s) Guarantees

FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45) provides expanded accounting guidance surrounding liability recognition and disclosure requirements related to guarantees, as defined by the interpretation. In the ordinary course of business, the Company is not subject to potential obligations under guarantees that fall within the scope of FIN 45 except for standard indemnification provisions that are contained within many of our advertiser and distribution partner agreements, and give rise only to the disclosure requirements prescribed by FIN 45.

Indemnification provisions contained within the Company’s advertiser and distribution partner agreements are generally consistent with those prevalent in the Company’s industry. The Company has not incurred significant obligations under advertiser and distribution partner indemnification provisions historically and does not expect to incur significant obligations in the future. Accordingly, the Company does not maintain accruals for potential advertiser and distribution partner indemnification obligations.

(t) Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123-R (SFAS 123R), Share-Based Payment, which replaces SFAS No. 123 (SFAS 123) and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25 (APB 25). As originally issued, SFAS 123 established as preferable a fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. However, that pronouncement permitted entities to continue applying the intrinsic-value-based model of APB 25, provided that the financial statements disclosed the pro forma net income or loss based on the preferable fair-value method. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006. Thus, the Company’s consolidated financial statements will reflect an expense for (a) all share-based compensation arrangements granted after January 1, 2006 and for any such arrangements that are modified, cancelled, or repurchased after that date, and (b) the portion of previous share-based awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered as of that date, based on the grant-date estimated fair value of those awards. See Note 1(m), “Stock Option Plan” for the pro forma net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share amounts, for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to measure compensation cost for employee stock incentive awards. Upon adoption during the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the Company will recognize stock-based compensation using the modified prospective method and expects the adoption to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company will continue to recognize stock-based compensation after the date of adoption of SFAS 123R using the straight-line method for all stock awards issued after January 1, 2006, which will result in the recognition of less stock-based compensation over at least the next several years compared to that which would have been recognized had we continued to use the accelerated method.

SFAS 123R requires that the deferred stock-based compensation on the Company’s balance sheet on the date of adoption be netted against paid-in capital. At December 31, 2005, the Company had $3.0 million of deferred stock-based compensation on our balance sheet.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. In accordance with this Bulletin, effective January 1, 2006 the Company will no longer present stock-based compensation separately on our statements of income. Instead we will present stock-based compensation in the same lines as cash compensation paid to the same individuals.

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements (SFAS 154). The new statement changes the requirements for the accounting for, and reporting of, a change in accounting principle. Previously, voluntary changes in accounting principles were generally required to be recognized by way of a cumulative effect adjustment within net income during the period of the change. SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005; however, the statement does not change the transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements.

(2) Related Party Transactions

TrafficLeader subleases office space to Wiant Design, an entity owned by an employee of TrafficLeader. In connection with the sublease, $3,000 and $2,000 were received from Wiant Design and included the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively. These amounts have been recorded as a reduction to rent expense.

In July 2004, the Company acquired goClick from its sole stockholder. In connection with the acquisition, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with the former stockholder. The former stockholder is also a distribution partner for the Company and through this entity provided customer and colocation services to the Company. The amounts in relation to these transactions follow:


	December 31, 2004		December 31, 2005
Consulting services	$	16,531	$	16,000
Distribution partner		15,522	$	17,462
Customer support and colocation services		39,054	$	3,217

Total	$	71,107	$	36,679

Due to former sole stockholder	$	9,708	$	31,785

In February 2005, the Company acquired certain assets from Name Development. Subsequent to the asset acquisition in 2005, Name Development provided consulting services totaling $50,000.

(3) Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following:


	Year ended December 31, 2005
Computer and other related equipment	$	2,828,726
Purchased and internally developed software		2,142,710
Furniture and fixtures		107,829
Leasehold improvements		94,561

	$	5,173,826
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(1,771,564	)

Property and equipment, net	$	3,402,262

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The Company has capitalized certain internally developed software for internal use. The estimated useful life of costs capitalized is evaluated for each specific project. Amortization begins in the period in which the software is ready for its intended use. The Company had $1.3 million of unamortized internally developed software costs at December 31, 2005.

Depreciation and amortization expense incurred by the Company was approximately $621,000 and $896,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively.

(4) Commitments

(a) Commitments

The Company has commitments for future payments related to office facilities leases, equipment and furniture leases, and other contractual obligations. The Company leases its office facilities under operating lease agreements expiring through 2010. In December 2005, the Company entered into a one year sublease agreement for additional office space in Seattle, Washington and entered into a new facilities lease agreement for the Utah office for an initial period of approximately two and one-half years with the option to renew the lease for two additional terms of two (2) years. In connection with the Company’s acquisition of IndustryBrains, the Company assumed the office facilities lease for IndustryBrains. The equipment and furniture leases are financed through capital lease arrangements and are included in property and equipment and the related depreciation is recorded as depreciation expense. The Company also has other contractual obligations expiring over varying time periods through 2007. Other contractual obligations primarily relate to minimum contractual payments due to distribution partners and other service providers. Future minimum payments are as follows:


	Equipment and furniture capital leases			Facilities operating leases		Other contractual obligations		Total


2006	$	18,337		$	1,118,658	$	883,149	$	2,020,144
2007		18,337			871,096		120,080		1,009,513
2008		18,337			760,219		25,240		803,796
2009		15,649			631,461		16,000		663,110
2010		—			169,294		—		169,294

Total minimum payments	$	70,660		$	3,550,728	$	1,044,469	$	4,665,857

Less: amounts representing interest		(17,185	)

Present value of lease obligation		53,475
Less current portion		(11,063	)

Long-term portion	$	42,412

From January 1, 2006 through March 29, 2006, the Company incurred other contractual obligations related to minimum contractual payments due to distribution partners totaling approximately $796,000. These commitments relate to 2006 and 2007.

Rent expense incurred by the Company was approximately $555,000 and $795,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively.

In connection with the closing of the Name Development asset acquisition, the Company entered into (i) a new master agreement with an advertising partner with respect to the Company’s direct navigation business, and (ii) a license agreement with the same partner with respect to certain of the partner’s patents, pursuant to which the Company paid $4.5 million in an upfront payment (and an additional $674,000 in certain circumstances) and a contingent royalty based upon a discounted rate of 3% (3.75% under certain circumstances) of certain of the

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Company’s gross revenues payable on a quarterly basis through December 2016. The royalty payment is recognized as incurred in service costs.

(b) Facility Relocation

As part of its anticipated expansion in March 2004, the Company entered into a sublease agreement for new office facilities in Seattle, Washington and relocated from its original office facilities also located in Seattle, Washington. Future minimum payments related to these new facilities including existing furniture and equipment at the facilities as of December 31, 2005 are as follows: $422,000 in 2006 and $455,000 in each of 2007, 2008, and 2009. In March 2004, the Company accrued for lease and related costs of $230,000 for the estimated future obligations of non-cancelable lease and other payments for the original facilities which were no longer being used. In September 2004, the Company entered into a sublease arrangement associated with its original office facilities and reduced the lease and related costs accrual by $30,000. The remaining lease obligation for the original office facilities extends through June 30, 2006 and totaled $52,000 at December 31, 2005.

The remaining lease accrual is based on estimates of vacancy period and sublease income. The actual vacancy periods may differ from these estimates, and sublease income may not materialize. Accordingly, these estimates may be adjusted in future periods. The remaining liability at December 31, 2005 was $32,000, all of which was classified as a current liability.

(5) Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes for the Company consists of the following:


	December 31, 2004			December 31, 2005
	December 31, 2004			December 31, 2005
Current provision
Federal	$	1,177,564		$	2,011,035
State		244,846			393,726

Total current provision for income taxes		1,422,410			2,404,761
Deferred provision
Federal		(1,654,619	)		(2,512,761	)
State		(178,011	)		(177,703	)

Total deferred benefit for income taxes		(1,832,630	)		(2,690,464	)
Tax expense of equity adjustment for stock option exercise		444,161			3,197,684
Other		—			8,482

Total income tax provision	$	33,941		$	2,920,463

Income tax expense differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% to income (loss) before income taxes as a result of the following:


	Year ended December 31, 2004			Year ended December 31, 2005


Income tax expense (benefit) at U.S. statutory rate of 34%	$	(237,712	)	$	2,321,611
State taxes, net of federal benefit		39,058			193,732
Non-deductible stock compensation		202,630			341,220
Other non-deductible expenses		29,965			63,900

Total income tax provision	$	33,941		$	2,920,463

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented below:


	December 31, 2005
Deferred tax assets:
Accrued liabilities not currently deductible	$	201,930
Intangible assets-excess of financial statement over tax amortization		2,420,844
Stock-based compensation		803,579
Deferred revenue		69,906
Start-up costs not currently deductible		30,304

Total deferred tax assets		3,526,563

Deferred tax liabilities:
Goodwill not amortized for financial reporting		2,883,241
Excess of tax over financial statement depreciation		611,948

Total deferred tax liabilities		3,495,189

Net deferred tax assets	$	31,374

At December 31, 2004 and 2005, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1.7 million which begin to expire in 2019. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 limits the use of net operating loss (NOL) and tax credit carryforwards in certain situations where changes occur in the stock ownership of a company. The Company believes that such a change has occurred, and that the utilization of the approximately $1.7 million in carryforwards is limited such that substantially all of these NOL carryforwards will never be utilized. Accordingly, the Company has not included these NOL carryforwards in its deferred tax assets.

The valuation allowance did not change during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005.

On July 24, 2004, in connection with the purchase accounting for the acquisition of goClick, the Company recorded net deferred assets of approximately $11,000 relating to the difference in the book versus tax basis of its liabilities in the amount of approximately $31,000. The $9.4 million of goodwill and $3.3 million of intangible assets relating to the goClick acquisition are being deducted over 15 years for federal tax purposes.

On February 14, 2005, in connection with the purchase accounting for the Name Development asset acquisition, the Company recorded approximately $111.4 million in goodwill and $52.9 million of intangible assets that are deductible over 15 years for federal tax purposes.

On April 26, 2005, in connection with the purchase accounting for the Pike Street asset acquisition, the Company recorded approximately $11.8 million and $5.0 million of intangible assets that are deductible over 15 years for federal tax purposes.

On July 27, 2005, in connection with the purchase accounting for the acquisition of the IndustryBrains, the Company recorded net deferred tax liabilities of approximately $2.9 million, relating to the difference in the book basis and tax basis of its assets and liabilities. Approximately $2.9 million of this net deferred tax liability related to the book basis versus tax basis of the identifiable intangible assets in the acquisition totaling approximately $8.1 million.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The Company has recorded a deferred tax asset for stock-based compensation recorded on unexercised non-qualified stock options. The ultimate realization of this asset is dependent upon the fair value of the Company’s stock when the options are exercised. Although realization is not assured, the Company believes it is more likely than not, based on its operating performance and projections of future taxable income, that the Company’s net deferred tax assets will be realized. In determining that it was more likely than not that the Company would realize the deferred tax assets, factors considered included, historical taxable income, historical trends related to merchant advertiser usage rates and projected revenues and expenses. The amount of the net deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if the Company’s projections of future taxable income are reduced or if the Company does not perform at the levels it is projecting. This could result in increases to the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and a corresponding increase to income tax expense of up to the entire net amount of deferred tax assets. From time to time, various state, federal, and other jurisdictional tax authorities undertake reviews of the Company and its filings. In evaluating the exposure associated with various tax filing positions, the Company on occasion accrues charges for probable exposures. The Company believes any adjustments that may ultimately be required as a result of any of these reviews will not be material to the financial statements.

During the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, as a result of a tax deduction from stock option exercises, the Company recognized a tax-effected benefit of approximately $444,000 and $3.2 million which was recorded as a credit to stockholders’ equity.

(6) Stockholders’ Equity

(a) Common Stock and Authorized Capital

The Securities and Exchange Commission declared the Company’s registration statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No. 333-111096) under the Securities Act of 1933, effective on March 30, 2004. Under this registration statement, in an initial public offering, the Company registered 4,600,000 shares of its Class B common stock, including 600,000 shares subject to the underwriters’ over-allotment option, with an aggregate public offering price of $29.9 million.

On April 5, 2004 the Company completed its initial public offering in which it sold 4,600,000 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock that resulted in aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $29.9 million, of which the Company applied approximately $1.5 million to underwriting discounts and commissions and approximately $1.2 million to related initial public offering costs. As a result, the net cash amount of the offering proceeds was approximately $27.2 million. In connection with the initial public offering, the underwriters were also granted warrants, exercisable for a four-year period commencing one year after the offering date, to purchase 120,000 shares of Class B common stock at an exercise price equal to $8.45 per share. The $579,000 fair value of the warrants is also an initial public offering related cost and was determined on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield of 0%, risk-free interest rate of 4.75%, volatility of 102%, and an expected life equal to the warrant term of five years. During 2005, the Company issued 62,551 of Class B common stock upon the exercise of these warrants. As of December 31, 2005, approximately 6,500 warrants remained unexercised.

Following the completion of the initial public offering, the authorized capital stock of the Company consisted of 1,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock and 125,000,000 shares of Class B common stock. The Company’s board of directors have the authority to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value in one or more series and have the authority to designate rights, privileges and restrictions of each such series, including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any series.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The Company has two classes of authorized common stock: Class A common stock and Class B common stock. Except with respect to voting rights, the Class A and Class B shares have identical rights. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to twenty-five votes per share, and each share of Class B common stock is entitled to one vote per share. Each share of Class A common stock is convertible at the holder’s option into one share of Class B common stock.

In accordance with the stockholders’ agreement signed by Class A and the founding Class B common stockholders, the following provisions exist:

Class A stockholders other than Russell C. Horowitz may only sell, assign or transfer their Class A stock to existing Class A stockholders or to the Company. In the event of transfers of Class A stock not expressly permitted by the agreement, such shares of Class A stock shall be converted into shares of Class B common stock.

So long as an individual stockholder subject to the stockholders agreement has a beneficial ownership interest of 5% or more of any class of stock in the Company, the stockholder shall have a right to participate on a pro-rata basis in any new issuance of securities, other than shares issued in an initial public offering.

At each annual meeting to elect board of director members, stockholders subject to the agreement agree to vote in favor of two Directors as designated by an entity controlled by the Company’s CEO.

In February 2005, the Company closed an offering of 9,200,000 shares of Class B common stock at a public offering price of $20.00 per share and 230,000 shares of 4.75% convertible exchangeable preferred stock at a public offering price of $250 per share and with a liquidation preference of $250 per share. These amounts include the exercise by the Company’s underwriters of their over-allotment option to purchase 1,200,000 additional shares of Class B common stock and 30,000 additional shares of preferred stock. The common stock and preferred stock proceeds, net of total offering costs of $12.2 million, were approximately $174.1 million and $55.3 million, respectively, for an aggregate amount of $229.4 million.

(b) Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock

In February and May 2003, the Company issued a total of 6,724,063 shares, $0.01 par value per share, of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock (Series A Preferred Stock), at $3.00 per share for net proceeds totaling $20.1 million, net of issuance costs of $51,000.

In April 2004 upon the completion of the Company’s initial public offering, 6,724,063 outstanding shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock automatically converted into 6,724,063 shares of Class B common stock and the Series A Preferred Stock was automatically retired.

(c) Convertible Preferred Stock

In February 2005, the Company closed its offering of 9,200,000 shares of Class B common stock at a public offering price of $20.00 per share and 230,000 shares of 4.75% convertible exchangeable preferred stock at a public offering price of $250 per share and with a liquidation preference of $250 per share. See Note 6(a) – “Common Stock and Authorized Capital”.

Dividends on the preferred stock are cumulative from the date of original issue at the annual rate of 4.75% of the liquidation preference of the preferred stock, payable quarterly on the 15^th day of February, May, August

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

and November, commencing May 15, 2005. Any dividends must be declared by the Company’s board of directors and must come from funds which are legally available for dividend payments.

During 2005, the Company’s board of directors declared the following quarterly dividends on the Company’s 4.75% convertible exchangeable preferred stock:


Approval Date	Per share dividend		Date of record	Total amount (in thousands)		Payment date
April 2005	$	3.00	May 4, 2005	$	690	May 16, 2005
July 2005		2.97	August 4, 2005		683	August 15, 2005
October 2005		2.97	November 4, 2005		683	November 15, 2005

The preferred stock is convertible at the option of the holder at any time into shares of the Company’s Class B common stock at a conversion rate of approximately 10.2041 shares of Class B common stock for each share of preferred stock, based on an initial conversion price of $24.50. The initial conversion price is subject to adjustment in certain events, including a non-stock fundamental change or a common stock fundamental change. During 2005, approximately 4,515 shares of preferred stock were converted at the option of the holders into approximately 46,071 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock at a conversion price of $24.50 per share. In January 2006, approximately 2,500 shares of preferred stock were converted at the option of the holders into approximately 25,510 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock at a conversion price of $24.50 per share. In March 2006, the Company entered into privately negotiated and unsolicited transactions with certain holders of the preferred stock in which such holders converted approximately 80,848 shares of the Company’s preferred stock into the Company’s Class B common stock for approximately 824,978 shares of Class B common stock at a conversion rate of $24.50 per share and received cash payments from the Company of $12.00 per share of preferred stock for an aggregate amount of approximately $970,000. The $970,000 will be reflected as preferred stock dividends in our financial statements. Through March 16, 2006, approximately 142,137 shares of preferred stock remained outstanding following the conversions.

The Company may automatically convert the preferred stock into shares of Class B common stock if the closing price of the Company’s Class B common stock has exceeded $36.75, which is 150% of the conversion price, for at least 20 of the 30 consecutive trading days ending within 5 trading days prior to the notice of automatic conversion.

If the Company elects to automatically convert some or all of the preferred stock into shares of Class B common stock prior to February 15, 2008, the Company will make an additional payment on the preferred stock equal to the aggregate amount of cumulative dividends that would have accrued and become payable on the preferred stock from February 14, 2005 through and including February 15, 2008, less any dividends already paid on the preferred stock. This additional payment is payable in cash or, at the Company’s option, in shares of the Company’s Class B common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of Class B common stock.

The Company may elect to redeem the preferred stock, in whole or in part, at declining redemption prices on or after February 20, 2008.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The preferred stock is exchangeable, in whole but not in part, at the option of the Company on any dividend payment date beginning on February 15, 2006 for the Company’s 4.75% convertible subordinated debentures (Debentures) at the rate of $250 principal amount of Debentures for each share of preferred stock. This embedded derivative will be reflected as an asset, if there is any value ascribed to it, and is subject to variable accounting. The right will be marked to market at each reporting date until such time as the right is exercised or expires. Based on a variety of factors including the assessed probability of exercise, no value has been ascribed to this right at December 31, 2005. The Debentures, if issued, will mature 25 years after the exchange date.

The preferred stock has no maturity date and no voting rights prior to conversion into shares of Class B common stock, except under limited circumstances.

(d) Stock Option Plan

In January 2003, the Company adopted a stock incentive plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to which the Plan’s Administrative Committee, appointed by the Company’s Board of Directors, may grant both stock options and restricted stock awards to employees, officers, non-employee directors, and consultants and may be designated as incentive or non-qualified stock options at the discretion of the Administrative Committee. The Plan authorizes grants of options to purchase up to 4,000,000 shares of authorized but unissued Class B common stock and provides for the total number of shares of Class B common stock for which options designated as incentive stock options may be granted shall not exceed 8,000,000 shares. Annual increases are to be added on the first day of each fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2004 equal to 5% of the outstanding common stock (including for this purpose any shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of any outstanding capital stock of the Company). As a result of this provision, the authorized number of shares available under this Plan was increased by 1,013,953 to 5,013,953 on January 1, 2004 and by 1,274,948 to 6,288,901 on January 1, 2005 and by 1,972,526 to 8,261,427 on January 1, 2006. Generally, stock options have 10-year terms and vest 25% at the end of each year over a 4 year period.

In connection with the purchase of Enhance Interactive, the Company agreed to grant 1,250,000 options to purchase Class B common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share to employees of Enhance Interactive. The options were not accounted for as purchase consideration as they were contingent upon the employees signing employment agreements with the Company. A total of 416,667 of these options were vested upon issuance. The remaining 833,333 shares vest in one-third increments at the end of each year over a 3 year period.

The purchase agreement required 125,000 of the 416,667 vested options be held in escrow as security for the indemnification obligations under the merger agreement. While in escrow, these options were not exercisable and are subject to forfeiture. These options were accounted for as variable awards because they were subject to forfeiture, until the expiration of the escrow period on February 28, 2004. In accounting for variable awards, compensation cost was measured each period as the amount by which the then fair market value of the stock exceeds the exercise price. Changes, either increases or decreases, in the fair value of those awards between the date of grant and the measurement date resulted in a change in the measure of compensation for the award.

During the period from January 17, 2003 (inception) to December 31, 2003, the Company granted certain options including those discussed above with exercise prices less than the then current fair market value. As a result, the Company recorded total deferred compensation expense of approximately $2,104,000, excluding the variable awards noted above. The Company currently recognizes compensation expense over the vesting period utilizing the accelerated methodology described in FASB Interpretation No. 28, Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans (FIN 28). During the 2004 and 2005 period, the Company did not grant any options with exercise prices less than the then current market value.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

In accordance with the accelerated methodology under FIN 28, approximately $484,000 and $233,000 was recognized as stock-based compensation expense related to stock options during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 and approximately $309,000 and $75,000 remained as deferred compensation at December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively, which will continue to be amortized over the vesting period of the options.

The per share fair value of stock and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) options granted during the year ended December 31, 2004 was determined on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: expected dividend yield 0%, risk-free interest rate ranging from of 4.25% to 4.75%, volatility ranging from 85% to 102%, for employee and director grants and an expected life of 4 years for stock options and .25 years for ESPP options.

The per share fair value of stock and (ESPP) options granted during the year ended December 31, 2005 was determined on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: expected dividend yield 0%, risk-free interest rate ranging from of 3.69% to 4.36%, volatility ranging from 58% to 61%, for employees and director grants and an expected life of 4 years for stock options and .25 years for ESPP options.

Stock option activity during the period indicated is as follows:


	Options available for grant		Number of options outstanding		Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average fair value of options granted
Balance at December 31, 2003	910,400		3,089,598		$	2.71
Increase to option pool January 1, 2004	1,013,953		—
Granted equal to or above fair value	(1,683,200	)	1,683,200			11.54	7.59
Options exercised	—		(159,622	)		1.20
Options cancelled	203,608		(203,608	)		4.36

Balance at December 31, 2004	444,761		4,409,568			6.06
Increase to option pool January 1, 2005	1,274,948		—
Granted equal to or above fair value	(1,959,225	)	1,959,225			16.47	8.09
Options exercised	—		(618,336	)		3.20
Options cancelled	335,525		(335,525	)		11.92

Balance at December 31, 2005	96,009		5,414,932		$	9.79

The following table summarizes information concerning currently outstanding and exercisable options at December 31, 2005:


Options Outstanding					Options Exercisable
Range of exercise prices Per share	Number Outstanding	Average remaining contractual life (in years)	Weighted average exercise price per share		Number exercisable	Weighted average exercise price per share
$0.75	909,300	7.16	$	0.75	581,186	$	0.75
$3.00	772,557	7.32		3.00	353,810		3.00
$6.50	712,111	7.85		6.50	279,820		6.50
$8.76 – $12.75	1,010,214	8.72		12.08	215,557		12.24
$12.76 – $18.97	1,833,850	9.57		16.06	37,401		17.21
$18.97 – $25.13	176,900	9.17		21.06	—		—

	5,414,932	8.45	$	9.79	1,467,774	$	4.50

A total of 1,467,774 of the outstanding options were vested at December 31, 2005.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(e) Employee Stock Purchase Plan

On February 15, 2004, the Company’s board of directors and shareholders approved the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which became effective on March 30, 2004. The plan provides eligible employees the opportunity to purchase the Company’s Class B common stock for amounts up to 15% of their compensation during offering periods. Under the plan, no employee will be permitted to purchase stock worth more than $25,000 in any calendar year, valued as of the first day of each offering period. The Company has authorized an aggregate of 300,000 shares of Class B common stock for issuance under the plan to participating employees.

The purchase plan provides for offering periods which shall be determined by the board of directors. Eligible participants may purchase Class B common stock under the purchase plan at a price equal to the lesser of 85% of the fair value on the first day of an offering period or 85% of the fair value on the last day of an offering period. During 2004, 26,735 shares were purchased at prices ranging from $8.08 to $11.25 per share. During 2005, 17,280 shares were purchased at prices ranging from $12.75 to $15.84 per share. As of December 31, 2004 and 2005, approximately 273,000 and 256,000 shares, respectively, were available under the purchase plan for future issuance.

In December 2005, the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors amended the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to provide that effective January 1, 2006 eligible participants may purchase Class B common stock under the purchase plan at a price equal to 95% of the fair value on the last day of an offering period.

(f) Issuance of Class B Common Stock

The Company has issued restricted stock to employees for future services in connection with acquisitions. In accordance with the accelerated vesting methodology under FIN 28, the Company amortizes the deferred stock-based compensation as compensation expense over the associated employment periods over which the shares vest.

In October 2003, in connection with the acquisition of TrafficLeader, the Company issued 108,432 shares of restricted Class B common stock that were valued at $6.75 per share. The shares are forfeitable and were issued to employees for future services, and vest over a period of three years, with the first 16.67% vesting after six months and each additional 16.67% vesting each successive 6-month period over the next thirty months. The 108,432 shares were valued at approximately $732,000 and are being recorded as compensation expense over the associated employment period in which these shares vest. Approximately $407,000 was recognized as stock-based compensation during the year ended December 31, 2004 and approximately $213,000 remained as deferred compensation at December 31, 2004. During 2005, the Company reversed approximately $92,000 of stock-based compensation costs due to forfeitures by employees of all remaining unvested shares of restricted stock. Accordingly, there was no deferred compensation balance at December 31, 2005.

In April 2005, in connection with the Pike Street Industries asset acquisition, the Company issued 212,404 shares of restricted Class B common stock that were valued at $16.85 per share. The shares are forfeitable and were issued to employees for future services, and vest over a period of three years, with the first 16.67% vesting after six months and each additional 16.67% vesting each successive 6-month period over the next thirty months. The 212,404 shares were valued at approximately $3.6 million and are being recorded as compensation expense over the associated employment periods over which these shares vest. A forfeiture by an employee of shares of this restricted stock occurred during 2005 which resulted in the Company recording a net stock-based compensation cost of approximately $887,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005, and approximately $903,000 remained as deferred compensation at December 31, 2005.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

In July 2005, in connection with the acquisition of Industry Brains, the Company issued 176,909 shares of restricted Class B common stock that were valued at $17.00 per share. The shares are forfeitable and were issued to employees for future services, and vest over a period of thirty months, with the first 33.33% vesting after ten months and each additional 33.33% vesting each successive 10-month period over the next twenty months. The 176,909 shares were valued at approximately $3.0 million and are being recorded as compensation expense over the associated employment periods over which these shares vest. Approximately $944,000 was recognized as stock-based compensation during the year ended December 31, 2005, and approximately $2.1 million remained as deferred compensation at December 31, 2005.

(7) Contingencies

The Company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types from time to time. While any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, the Company is not aware of any legal proceedings or claims which are pending that the Company believes, based on current knowledge, will have, individually or taken together, a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

(8) 401(k) Savings Plan

The Company has a Retirement/Savings Plan (“401(k) Plan”) under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code which covers those employees that meet eligibility requirements. Eligible employees may contribute up to the Internal Revenue Code prescribed maximum amounts. Under the 401(k) Plan, management may, but is not obligated to, match a portion of the employee contributions up to a defined maximum. No matching contributions have been made to date.

(9) Acquisition of goClick.com, Inc.

On July 27, 2004, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of goClick. goClick is a provider of marketing technology and services for small merchants. As a result of the acquisition, the Company obtained customer-facing technologies and a broader base of merchant advertisers and distribution partners. The purchase price consideration consisted of net cash and acquisition costs of approximately $7.5 million and 433,541 shares of Class B common stock. The shares of Class B common stock were valued (for accounting purposes) for an aggregate amount of approximately $4.14 million.

The following summarizes the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:


Current assets, including acquired cash and cash equivalents of $1,037,756	$	1,060,078
Property and equipment		27,819
Intangible assets		3,260,000
Goodwill		9,387,023

Total assets acquired		13,734,920

Current liabilities		1,008,853

Net assets acquired	$	12,726,067

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

In connection with the acquisition, $823,000 of cash consideration and 43,354 shares of the 433,541 shares of Class B common stock were placed in escrow to secure indemnification obligations from the sole stockholder. The escrowed amounts were included as part of the purchase price consideration and were released one year after the acquisition date to the sole stockholder as no indemnification obligations were identified.

The acquired intangible assets in the amount of $3.3 million have a weighted average useful life of approximately 1.9 years. The identifiable intangible assets are comprised of a merchant advertiser customer base with a value of approximately $500,000 (2-year weighted-average useful life), distribution partner base with a value of approximately $700,000 (3-year weighted-average useful life), non-compete agreement with a value of approximately $900,000 (2-year weighted average useful life), trademarks/domain names with a value of approximately $60,000 (3-year weighted average useful life), and acquired technology with a value of $1.1 million (1-year weighted average useful life). The goodwill of $9.4 million and the acquired intangible assets with a value of $3.3 million are deductible over 15 years for federal tax purposes.

(10) Name Development Asset Acquisition

On February 14, 2005, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Name Development, a corporation operating in the direct navigation market, for purchase consideration of $164.4 million in a combination of cash and equity. The Company accounted for the Name Development asset acquisition as a business combination. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company acquired certain assets of Name Development, including its portfolio of Internet domains and Web sites, revenue-generating contracts, technology and systems for the operation of the Name Development direct navigation business. The Company did not assume any other obligations with respect to Name Development as part of this asset acquisition. As a result of the acquisition, the Company obtained a proprietary source of targeted traffic.

The following summarizes the estimated fair value of the assets acquired at the date of acquisition:


Current assets	$	45,808
Intangible assets		52,914,370
Goodwill		111,443,418

Total assets acquired	$	164,403,596

In connection with the acquisition, $24.6 million of the cash consideration was placed in escrow to secure indemnification obligations for a period of 18 months from the closing date. The escrow amounts are included as part of the purchase price consideration. In the event any indemnification obligations are identified on or prior to the end of the escrow period, the purchase price will be reduced accordingly. The escrow amounts, less any indemnification obligations identified, will be released upon termination of the escrow period. A net amount of $357,000 was released from escrow in March 2006 in satisfaction of certain intangible asset indemnification obligations. This amount will be reflected as an adjustment to goodwill in 2006.

The acquired intangible assets in the amount of $52.9 million have a weighted average useful life of approximately 4.4 years and are being amortized using the straight-line method. The identifiable intangible assets are comprised of a non-compete agreement with a value of approximately $5.7 million (2-year weighted-average useful life), domain names with a value of approximately $46.4 million (4.7-year weighted average useful life), and acquired technology with a value of approximately $800,000 (3-year weighted average useful life). The goodwill of $111.4 million and the acquired intangible assets with a value of $52.9 million are deductible over 15 years for federal tax purposes.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(11) Pike Street Industries Asset Acquisition

On April 26, 2005, the Company acquired certain assets of Pike Street, an online yellow pages and lead generation provider for local merchants. The purchase price consideration consisted of:

•

$12.8 million in cash and estimated acquisition costs; plus

•

242,748 shares of Class B common stock; plus

•

212,404 shares of restricted Class B common stock that vest over a period of 3 years.

The Company accounted for the Pike Street asset acquisition as a business combination and as a result of the acquisition, acquired additional sources of proprietary targeted traffic.

The shares of Class B common stock, excluding the shares of restricted Class B common stock, were valued (for accounting purposes) at an aggregate amount of approximately $4.1 million. The shares of restricted Class B common stock were valued at $16.85 per share (the last reported sales price on the closing date) for an aggregate amount of approximately $3.6 million. The shares of restricted Class B common stock were issued to the former stockholders of Pike Street who became employees of the Company. The shares vest over a period of three years, with the first 16.67% vesting after six months and each additional 16.67% vesting each successive 6-month period over the next thirty months. As part of employment agreements entered into with these former stockholders of Pike Street, a deferred stock-based compensation charge of approximately $3.6 million was recorded in connection with the 212,404 shares of restricted Class B common stock. The deferred stock-based compensation is being amortized using the accelerated vesting method, in accordance with FIN 28, as compensation costs over the associated three-year employment periods over which those shares vest. During 2005, a forfeiture by an employee of shares of restricted stock resulted in the Company recording a net stock-based compensation cost of approximately $887,000 from the acquisition date through December 31, 2005.

The Company did not assume any other obligations with respect to Pike Street as part of this asset acquisition.

The following summarizes the preliminary estimated fair value of the assets acquired at the date of acquisition:


Property and equipment	$	6,874
Intangible assets		5,025,000
Goodwill		11,827,967

Total assets acquired	$	16,859,841

To date the Company has conducted a preliminary analysis of the estimated fair value of the intangible assets acquired from Pike Street. The foregoing estimates may be subject to adjustment upon the completion of the Company’s final review and assessment of the fair value of the assets acquired in the acquisition.

In connection with the acquisition, $1.3 million of the cash consideration, 24,275 shares of Class B common stock, and 81,927 shares of restricted Class B common stock were placed in escrow to secure indemnification obligations for a period of 12 months from the closing date. The escrow amounts are included as part of the purchase price consideration. In the event any indemnification obligations are identified, the purchase price will be reduced accordingly. The escrow amounts, less any indemnification obligations identified, will be released upon termination of the escrow period.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The acquired intangible assets in the amount of $5.0 million have a weighted average useful life of approximately 3.4 years and are being amortized using the straight-line method. The identifiable intangible assets are comprised of non-compete agreements with a value of approximately $500,000 (3-year weighted-average useful life), domain names with a value of approximately $1.0 million (5-year weighted average useful life), merchant advertiser customer base with a value of approximately $2.4 million (3-year weighted-average useful life) and acquired technology with a value of approximately $1.1 million (3-year weighted average useful life). The goodwill of $11.8 million and the acquired intangible assets with a value of $5.0 million are deductible over 15 years for federal tax purposes.

(12) IndustryBrains Acquisition

On July 27, 2005, the Company acquired IndustryBrains, a company focused on monetizing Web sites through contextual advertising solutions, for the following purchase price consideration:

•

$16.1 million in net cash and estimated acquisition costs; plus

•

788,046 shares of Class B common stock; plus

•

176,909 shares of restricted Class B common stock that vest over a two and one-half years.

The Company accounted for the IndustryBrains acquisition as a business combination. As a result of the acquisition, the Company obtained technologies focused on contextual advertising solutions and a broader base of merchant advertisers and distribution partners.

The shares of Class B common stock, excluding the shares of restricted Class B common stock, were valued (for accounting purposes) at an aggregate amount of approximately $13.4 million.

The shares of restricted Class B common stock were valued at $17.00 per share (the last reported sales price on the closing date) for an aggregate amount of approximately $3.0 million. The shares of restricted Class B common stock were issued to employee stockholders of IndustryBrains who became employees of the Company. The shares vest over a period of two and one-half years, with the first 33.34% vesting after ten months and each additional 33.33% vesting each successive ten month period over the next twenty months. As part of employment agreements entered into with these former stockholders of IndustryBrains, a deferred stock-based compensation charge of approximately $3.0 million was recorded in connection with the 176,909 shares of restricted Class B common stock. The deferred stock-based compensation is being amortized using the accelerated vesting method, in accordance with FIN 28, as compensation costs over the associated three-year employment periods over which those shares vest. The Company recorded stock-based compensation cost of approximately $944,000 from the acquisition date through December 31, 2005.

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The following summarizes the preliminary estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:


Current assets, including acquired cash and cash equivalents $1,147,154	$	2,074,787
Property and equipment		81,008
Other non-current assets		55,805
Intangible assets		8,100,000
Goodwill		25,018,206

Total assets acquired		35,329,806

Current liabilities		1,718,714
Non-current deferred tax liabilities		2,957,799

Total liabilities assumed		4,676,513

Net assets acquired	$	30,653,293

To date the Company has conducted a preliminary analysis of the estimated fair value of the intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the IndustryBrains acquisition. The foregoing estimates may be subject to adjustment upon the completion of the Company’s final review and assessment of the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in the acquisition.

In connection with the acquisition, $2.5 million of the cash consideration, 118,207 shares of Class B common stock, and 26,536 shares of restricted Class B common stock were placed in escrow to secure indemnification obligations for a period of 12 months from the closing date. The escrow amounts are included as part of the purchase price consideration. In the event any indemnification obligations are identified, the purchase price will be reduced accordingly. The escrow amounts, less any indemnification obligations identified, will be released upon termination of the escrow period.

The acquired estimated intangible assets in the amount of $8.1 million have a weighted average useful life of approximately 2.8 years and are being amortized using the straight-line method. The identifiable intangible assets are comprised of non-compete agreements with a value of approximately $900,000 (2-year weighted-average useful life), domain names with a value of approximately $400,000 (1.5-year weighted average useful life), merchant advertiser customer base with a value of approximately $3.1 million (3-year weighted-average useful life), distribution partner base of approximately $900,000 (3-year weighted-average useful life), and acquired technology with a value of approximately $2.8 million (3-year weighted average useful life). The goodwill of $25.0 million and the acquired intangible assets with a value of $8.1 million are not deductible for federal tax purposes.

(13) Intangible Assets from Acquisitions

Intangible assets from acquisitions at December 31, 2005 consist of the following:


Merchant advertiser customer base	$	7,000,000
Distribution partner base		3,100,000
Non-compete agreements		9,100,000
Trademarks/domains		46,979,732
Acquired technology		11,400,000

	$	77,579,732
Less accumulated amortization		(26,232,788	)

Total	$	51,346,944

MARCHEX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Amortizable intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives. Aggregate amortization expense incurred by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, was approximately $5.0 million and $18.4 million, respectively. Based upon the current amount of intangible assets subject to amortization, the estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows: $19.0 million in 2006, $14.3 million in 2007, $10.7 million in 2008, $3.3 million in 2009, and $4.0 million in 2010 and thereafter.

(14) Intangible and other assets, net

As of December 31, 2005, Intangible and other assets, net consisted of the following:


Internet domain names	$	13,407,166
Less accumulated amortization		(2,327,978	)

Other intangible assets, net		11,079,188

Other assets:
License fee		4,500,000
Less accumulated amortization		(1,128,826	)

License fee, net		3,371,174

Restricted cash (Note 1(c))		800,000
Other		197,142

Total intangibles and other assets, net	$	15,447,504

The Company capitalizes costs incurred to acquire domain names or URLs, which include the initial registration fees, to other intangible assets which excludes intangible assets acquired through business combinations. The capitalized costs are amortized over the expected useful life of the domain names on a straight-line basis. Based upon the current amount of domains subject to amortization, the estimated expense for the next five years is as follows: $2.5 million in 2006, $2.5 million in 2007, $2.1 million in 2008, $1.6 million in 2009, and $2.4 million in 2010 and thereafter. There were approximately $300,000 of domains held for sale under prepaid and other current assets as of December 31, 2005 which are no longer being amortized.

In 2005, the Company entered into a license agreement with an advertising partner with respect to certain of the partner’s patents, pursuant to which the Company paid $4.5 million in an upfront payment (and an additional $674,000 in certain circumstances) and a contingent royalty based upon a discounted rate of 3% (3.75% under certain circumstances) of certain of the Company’s gross revenues payable on a quarterly basis through December 2016. The upfront license fee was capitalized and is being amortized ratably over 42 months.

(15) Pro Forma Results of Operations—goClick, Name Development, Pike Street and IndustryBrains (Unaudited)

The following table presents pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 as if the IndustryBrains acquisition and the Name Development and Pike Street asset acquisitions occurred as of January 1, 2005. The pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 combine: (1) the historical results of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005; (2) Name Development’s historical results of operations for the pre-acquisition period from January 1, 2005 to February 13, 2005; (3) an offering of only that number of shares of Class B common stock and preferred stock as necessary to consummate the Name Development asset acquisition for the period January 1, 2005 through February 13, 2005; (4) Pike Street’s historical results of operations for the pre-acquisition period from January 1, 2005 to April 25, 2005; and

(5) IndustryBrains’ historical results of operations for the pre-acquisition period from January 1, 2005 to July 26, 2005. During 2005, a forfeiture by an employee of shares of restricted stock related to the Pike Street acquisition occurred which resulted in the Company recording no compensation expense related to these forfeited shares in the historical results of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005. The following table also presents pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 as if the goClick and IndustryBrains acquisitions and the Name Development and Pike Street asset acquisitions had occurred as of January 1, 2004. The pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 combine: (1) the historical results of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004; (2) goClick’s historical results of operations for the pre-acquisition period from January 1, 2004 to July 26, 2004; (3) Name Development, Pike Street, and IndustryBrains’ historical results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004; and (4) an offering of only that number of shares of Class B common stock and preferred stock as necessary to consummate the Name Development asset acquisition. The Company has used statutory tax rates in effect during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 to calculate the tax effects of the pro forma adjustments in determining the pro forma results of operations for each of the periods presented.


	Twelve months ended December 31, 2004			Twelve months ended December 31, 2005

Revenue		$77,644,020			$104,923,611
Net income (loss)		(1,126,101	)		2,850,550
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders		(3,921,531	)		147,895
Net income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders:
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share	$	(0.13	)	$	0.00

The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the combined results that would have occurred had the acquisitions taken place at January 1, 2004 or at January 1, 2005, nor is it necessarily indicative of results that may occur in the future.

ITEM 8.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 8A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. Based on that evaluation, our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

(b) Changes in internal controls. There was no significant change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

(c) Limitations on effectiveness of controls. Our management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of our control system are met. However, our management (including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer) does not expect that the disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, errors and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been or will be detected.

ITEM 8B.

OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

PART III

ITEM 9.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement relating to the 2006 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2006 Proxy Statement”), which the Company intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

ITEM 10.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The information required under this item may be found in the 2006 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 11.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The information required under this item may be found in the 2006 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

The information required under this item may be found in the 2006 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 13.

EXHIBITS.

See the Exhibit Index following the signature page to this report.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

The information required under this item may be found in the 2006 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Seattle, State of Washington on March 31, 2006.


MARCHEX, INC.

By:		/S/ MICHAEL A. ARENDS
		Michael A. Arends Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Russell C. Horowitz and Michael A. Arends, jointly and severally, as his or her attorneys-in-fact, each with the full power of substitution, for him or her, in any and all capacities, to sign any amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact or any of them, or their or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:


Signature		Date

/S/ RUSSELL C. HOROWITZ Russell C. Horowitz Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)		March 31, 2006

/S/ MICHAEL A. ARENDS Michael A. Arends Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)		March 31, 2006

/S/ JOHN KEISTER John Keister President, Chief Operating Officer and Director		March 31, 2006

/S/ DENNIS CLINE Dennis Cline Director		March 31, 2006

/S/ JONATHAN FRAM Jonathan Fram Director		March 31, 2006

/S/ RICK THOMPSON Rick Thompson Director		March 31, 2006

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit Number		Description of Document

2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 19, 2003, by and among Registrant, Marchex Acquisition Corporation, eFamily.com, Inc., the Shareholders of eFamily.com, Inc., ah-ha.com, Inc. and Paul J. Brockbank, as Stockholder Representative (Filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on December 11, 2003).

2.2		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 1, 2003, by and among Registrant, Sitewise Acquisition Corporation, TrafficLeader, Inc., the Shareholders of TrafficLeader, Inc. and Gerald Wiant, as Shareholder Representative (Filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on December 11, 2003).

2.3		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 21, 2004, by and among Registrant, Project TPS, Inc., goClick.com, Inc and the Sole Stockholder of goClick.com, Inc. (Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 10, 2004).

2.4		Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2004, by and among Registrant, Name Development Ltd. and the Sole Stockholder of Name Development Ltd. (Filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-121213) filed with the SEC on December 13, 2004).

2.5		Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2005, by and among Marchex, Inc., Pike Street Industries, Inc. and the holders of all the issued and outstanding capital stock of Pike Street Industries, Inc. (Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 2, 2006).

2.6		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 27, 2005, by and among Marchex, Inc., Einstein Holdings I, Inc., Einstein Holdings 2, LLC, IndustryBrains, Inc., the primary shareholders of IndustryBrains, Inc. and with respect to Articles II, VII and XII only, Eric Matlick as shareholder representative (Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 2, 2006).

3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (Filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on December 11, 2003).

3.2		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (Filed with Registrant’s Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on March 19, 2004).

3.3		Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations (Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 15, 2005; provided, however, that the Registrant does not incorporate by reference any information contained in, or exhibits submitted on, a Form 8-K that was expressly furnished and not filed).

3.4		By-laws of the Registrant (Filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on December 11, 2003).

4.1		Specimen stock certificate representing shares of Class B Common Stock of the Registrant (Filed with the Registrant’s Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on March 30, 2004).

4.2		Specimen stock certificate representing shares of 4.75% Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock of the Registrant (Filed with the Registrant’s Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-121213) filed with the SEC on February 4, 2005).

4.3		Representative’s Warrant Agreement for Sanders Morris Harris Inc. (Filed with the Registrant’s Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on March 19, 2004).


Exhibit Number		Description of Document

4.4		Representative’s Warrant Agreement for National Securities Corporation (Filed with the Registrant’s Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on March 19, 2004).

4.5		Indenture (Filed with the Registrant’s Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-121213) filed with the SEC on February 4, 2005).

10.1		Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (Filed with the Registrant’s Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on March 19, 2004).

10.2		Sublease Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of January 18, 2003, by and between Marrch Holdings, LLC, the Registrant and Ecology and Environment, Inc. (Filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on December 11, 2003).

10.3		Office Lease, dated as of September 5, 2003, by and between the Registrant and Selig Real Estate Holdings Five (Filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on December 11, 2003).

10.4		Sublease, dated as of March 13, 2000, by and between MyFamily.com, Inc. and ah-ha.com, Inc. (Filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on December 11, 2003).

10.5		Indenture of Lease, dated as of August 31, 2001, by and between A&A Properties, N.W., L.L.C. and Sitewise Marketing, Inc. (Filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on December 11, 2003).

10.6		Sublease, dated as of June 1, 2003, by and between Radiant Marketing Solutions, Inc., as sublessor, and Sitewise Marketing, Inc., as sublessee, and Jerry Wiant and Bruce Fabbri, as guarantors (Filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on December 11, 2003).

10.7		Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2003, by and between Russell C. Horowitz and the Registrant (Filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on December 11, 2003).

10.8		Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2003, by and between Michael A. Arends and the Registrant (Filed with the Registrant’s Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on February 19, 2004).

10.9		2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Filed with the Registrant’s Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on February 19, 2004).

10.10		Letter of Intent, dated as of February 11, 2004, by and between Seattle’s Best Coffee, LLC and the Registrant (Filed with the Registrant’s Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on February 19, 2004).

10.11		Sublease, dated as of March 1, 2004, by and between Seattle’s Best Coffee, LLC and the Registrant (Filed with the Registrant’s Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on March 19, 2004).

10.12		Representative Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement, dated as of February 4, 2004, by and between Russell C. Horowitz and the Registrant (Filed with the Registrant’s Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-111096) filed with the SEC on March 19, 2004).

10.13		Sublease Agreement, dated September 9, 2004, by and between Registrant and G. Russell Knobel and Associates, Inc. (Filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on November 15, 2004).


Exhibit Number		Description of Document

10.14		Commercial Lease, entered into as of September 14, 2004, by and between Registrant and TrafficLeader, Inc. and A&A Properties Northwest (Filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on November 15, 2004).

10.15		License Agreement, effective February 14, 2005, by and between Overture Services, Inc. and Registrant (Filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on March 31, 2005).

10.16		Overture Master Agreement, effective February 14, 2005, by and between Overture Services, Inc., Overture Search Services (Ireland) Limited and MDNH, Inc. (Filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on March 31, 2005).

10.17		Master Services Terms and Conditions for Agencies and Resellers, dated effective as of September 14, 2004, by and between Overture Services, Inc. and Marchex, Inc. (d.b.a TrafficLeader) (Filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on March 31, 2005).

10.18		Amendment to the Master Services Terms and Conditions for Agencies and Resellers, dated as of November 23, 2004, by and between Overture Services, Inc. and Marchex, Inc. (d.b.a TrafficLeader) (Filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on March 31, 2005).

10.19		2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended on December 8, 2005 (Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 9, 2005).

21.1		Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

23.1		Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

24.1		Power of Attorney (please see signature page of this report).

31.1		Certification of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).

31.2		Certification of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).

32.1		Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 1350.

32.2		Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 1350.

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant


	Name	Jurisdiction
1.	Enhance Interactive, Inc.	Utah

2.	eFamily.com, Inc.	Utah

3.	TrafficLeader, Inc.	Delaware

4.	Marchex Paymaster, LLC	Delaware

5.	goClick.com, Inc.	Delaware

6.	IndustryBrains, LLC	Delaware

7.	MDNH, Inc.	Delaware

8.	MDNH CAH, Inc.	Delaware

9.	MDNH CA Corporation	Nova Scotia

10.	MDNH International, Ltd.	Ireland

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Marchex, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-116867 and 333-123753) on Form S-8 and (Nos. 333-125372 and 333-128317) on Form S-3 of Marchex, Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Marchex, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2005, which report appears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Marchex, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington

March 29, 2006

Certification of CEO

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Principal Executive Officer

I, Russell C. Horowitz, certify that:

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Marchex, Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;

The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006



		/s/ Russell C. Horowitz
		Russell C. Horowitz
		Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Certification of CFO

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Principal Financial Officer

I, Michael A. Arends, certify that:

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Marchex, Inc.;

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006



		/s/ Michael A. Arends
		Michael A. Arends
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Certification of CEO

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Russell C. Horowitz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Marchex, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Marchex, Inc.



Dated: March 31, 2006	By:	/s/ Russell C. Horowitz
	Name:	Russell C. Horowitz
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer

Certification of CFO

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael A. Arends, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Marchex, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Marchex, Inc.



Dated: March 31, 2006	By:	/s/ Michael A. Arends
	Name:	Michael A. Arends
	Title:	Chief Financial Officer